green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
University of Colorado Foundation, Inc. v. American Cyanamid
See Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855, 865 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956) (assignment ordered due to misappropriation of a trade secret resulting “from the employment-of one to whom it had been imparted in the course of a former employment”); De Long Corp. v. Lucas, 176 F.Supp. 104, 134 (S.D.N.Y.1959), aff'd, 278 F.2d 804 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 833 , 81 S.Ct. 71 , 5 L.Ed.2d 58 (1960) (former employee’s breach of no-competition clause and breach of covenant not to disclose trade secrets entitled former empl…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dirk Mayberry
See Herzog v. United States, 235 F.2d 664, 666 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (noting that Rule 52(b) of the *722 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure grants appellate courts authority to notice error on their own motions), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 54 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956); see also, United States v. Rico, 895 F.2d 602, 603 (9th Cir.1990) (considering sua sponte whether special assessment against defendant was error).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reilly v. United States
See Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 130 F.Supp. 557 (D.Md.1955), aff’d 230 F.2d 855 (4th Cir.1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956); Specialty Equipment & Machinery Corp. v. Zell Motor Car Co., 113 F.Supp. 161 (D.Md.1953).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Diggs, United States of America v. Peter Oliverez
Fed.R.Crim.P. 30, 52; see Herzog v. United States, 235 F.2d 664 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 54 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
United Farm Workers, AFL-CIO v. HE Butt Grocery Co.
See King v. Cron, 285 S.W.2d 833 (Tex.Civ.App. —San Antonio 1956, writ ref’d n. r. e.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 67 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
W. C. Sanderson v. Ford Motor Company, W. C. Sanderson v. United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw, Local Union No. 255
Secondly, the Alabama one-year statute "begins to run when the injury happens or damage accrues, and not from the date of the act causing the injury or damage." Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineer-men v. Hammett, 1962, 273 Ala. 397 , 140 So.2d 832 ; accord Central Georgia Railway v. Jones, 5th Cir. 1956, 229 F.2d 648 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 848 , 77 S.Ct. 32 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanderson v. Ford Motor Co.
Secondly, the Alabama one-year statute “begins to run when the injury happens or damage accrues, and not from the date of the act causing the injury or damage.” Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineermen v. Hammett, 1962, 273 Ala. 397 , 140 So.2d 832 ; accord Central Georgia Railway v. Jones, 5th Cir. 1956, 229 F.2d 648 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 848 , 77 S.Ct. 32 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 .
cited
Cited "see"
Leon Bearden v. United States
See Herzog v. United States, 9 Cir. 1956, 235 F.2d 664 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 54 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 .
cited
Cited "see"
Radio Corporation of America v. Philco Corporation
See Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Carter Products, 230 F.2d 855 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin Amador Beltran v. United States of America, (Three Cases)
(2×)
See United States v. Owen, 231 F.2d 831, 833 (C.A.7th, 1956), cert. denied 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 42 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
George P. Converse & Co. v. Standard Packaging Corp.
See Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 4 Cir., 1956, 230 F.2d 855, 862 , certiorari denied 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taborsky v. State
Such remedy is appropriate under the circumstances; see, e.g., Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855, 865 , 108 USPQ 383, 391 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956) (corporate assignee of patent application ordered to assign to original holder of trade secrets all rights to patent applications based thereon); DeLong Corp. v. Lucas, 176 F. Supp. 104, 134 (S.D.N.Y. 1959), aff'd., 278 F.2d 804 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 833 , 81 S.Ct. 71 , 5 L.Ed.2d 58 (1960) (when an employee has acquired patents on inventions developed by his for…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.
Such remedy is appropriate under the circumstances; see, e.g., Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855, 865 , 108 USPQ 383, 391 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956) (corporate assignee of patent application ordered to assign to original holder of trade secrets all rights to patent applications based thereon); De Long Corp. v. Lucas, 176 F.Supp. 104, 134 (S.D.N.Y.1959), aff'd, 278 F.2d 804 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 833 , 81 S.Ct. 71 , 5 L.Ed.2d 58 (1960) (when an employee has acquired patents on inventions developed by his form…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co.
Such remedy is appropriate under the circumstances; see, e.g., Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855, 865 , 108 USPQ 383, 391 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956) (corporate assignee of patent application ordered to assign to original holder of trade secrets all rights to patent applications based thereon); De Long Corp. v. Lucas, 176 F.Supp. 104, 134 (S.D.N.Y.1959), aff'd, 278 F.2d 804 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 833 , 81 S.Ct. 71 , 5 L.Ed.2d 58 (1960) (when an employee has acquired patents on inventions developed by his form…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reeves Instrument Corporation and Dynamics Corporation of America v. Beckman Instruments, Incorporated
See also Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Carter Products, Inc., 230 F.2d 855 (4th Cir.) cert. denied 352 U.S. 843 , 77 S.Ct. 43 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956). 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Virginia R. Hattaway v. United States
See also Herzog v. United States, 2 Cir. 1956, 235 F.2d 664, 666 , cert. den. 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 54 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Isbrandtsen Co., Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 298.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
Arthur 0. Louis for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Paul A. Sweeney, Leavenworth Colby and Herman Marcuse for the United States.
Published
[*842] C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.