United States v. Am. Freightways Co., 352 U.S. 1020 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Am. Freightways Co., 352 U.S. 1020 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest negative: Oklahoma Corp. Commission v. United States (oknd, 1974-12-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Oklahoma Corp. Commission v. United States
N.D. Okla. · 1974 · signal: but see · confidence high
See Examiner’s report, 16; and see, e. g., Atlantic City Electric Co. v. United States, 306 F.Supp. 338, 340 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 400 U.S. 73 , 91 S.Ct. 259 , 27 L.Ed.2d 212 ; but see Florida Citrus Commission v. United States, 144 F.Supp. 517, 524 (N.D.Fla.), aff’d 352 U.S. 1021 , 77 S.Ct. 589 , 1 L.Ed.2d 595 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
American Freightways Co.
No. 265.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1957.
352 U.S. 1020
Ralph S. Spritzer argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Judson W. Bowles. Samuel Masia argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was Martin Werner.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.