green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Teller v. APM Terminals Pacific, Ltd.
n cases where leave to amend to add additional defendant has been sought, this court has clearly held that inexcusable neglect alone is a sufficient ground for denying the motion.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bear
civil findings, conclusions and judgments were not judicially noticed for their truth or given preclusive effect....
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Child M.
See Matter of Cunningham, 517 Pa. 417, 438-439 , 538 A.2d 473, 484 , appeal dismissed, 488 U.S. 805 , 109 S.Ct. 36 , 102 L.Ed.2d 16 (1988) (explanatory words are not hearsay when under the substantive law the pertinent inquiry is directed only to objective manifestations rather than to the actual intent or other state of mind of the actor).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jesse J. Lightning v. Roadway Express, Inc.
(2×)
See Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Brown, 258 Ga. 115 , 365 S.E.2d 827, 833 (plurality opinion), appeal dismissed, 488 U.S. 805 , 109 S.Ct. 36 , 102 L.Ed.2d 15 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lightning v. Roadway Express, Inc.
(2×)
See Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Brown, 258 Ga. 115 , 365 S.E.2d 827, 833 (plurality opinion), appeal dismissed, 488 U.S. 805 , 109 S.Ct. 36 , 102 L.Ed.2d 15 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosenthal v. Justices of the Supreme Court of California
(2×)
See Rosenthal v. State Bar of California, 43 Cal.3d 612 , 238 Cal.Rptr. 377 , 738 P.2d 723 (1987) (en banc), appeal dismissed, 488 U.S. 805 , 109 S.Ct. 35 , 102 L.Ed.2d 15 (1988) {Rosenthal I).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosenthal v. Justices Of The Supreme Court Of California
(2×)
See Rosenthal v. State Bar of California, 43 Cal.3d 612 , 238 Cal.Rptr. 377 , 738 P.2d 723 (1987) (en banc), appeal dismissed, 488 U.S. 805 , 109 S.Ct. 35 , 102 L.Ed.2d 15 (1988) (Rosenthal I ).
discussed
Cited "see"
French v. Gabriel
(2×)
See RCW 4.28.080(14). ”[M]ere receipt of process and actual notice alone do not establish valid service of process." Haberman v. WPPSS, 109 Wn.2d 107, 177 , 744 P.2d 1032 , 750 P.2d 254 (1987), appeal dismissed, 488 U.S. 805 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alexander A. Simon, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Michael W. Swofford, Cross-Appellants
(2×)
See Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Brown, 258 Ga. 115, 118 , 365 S.E.2d 827, 830 , appeal dismissed, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 36 , 102 L.Ed.2d 15 (1988); Straw, 813 F.2d at 363 ; Williams v. Trust Co. of Georgia, 140 Ga. App. 49, 51-52 , 230 S.E.2d 45, 48 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Burlington Northern Railroad v. Grabber Construction Supply, Inc.
See Haberman v. WPPSS, 109 Wn.2d 107, 161-63 , 744 P.2d 1032 , 750 P.2d 254 (1987), appeal dismissed,_U.S._, 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Liles v. Balmer
See, e.g., Matter of Cunningham, 517 Pa. 417, 438-439 , 538 A.2d 473, 484 , appeal dismissed, 488 U.S. 805 , 109 S.Ct. 36 , 102 L.Ed.2d 16 (1988) (explanatory words are not hearsay when under the substantive law the pertinent inquiry is directed only to objective manifestations rather than to the actual intent or other state of mind of the actor); Smith v. Brooks, 394 Pa.Super. 327, 337-338 , 575 A.2d 926, 931 (1990), allocatur denied, 527 Pa. 621 , 625, 592 A.2d 42 , 45 (1991) (statements regarding the status of a traffic signal were not hearsay where they were used, not to prove the truth of…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kurt BLANKEMEYER, et ux.
v.
FEDERAL LAND BANK OF OMAHA
v.
FEDERAL LAND BANK OF OMAHA
No. 87-2088.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.