green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
“judicial review of prison officials' justification for holding a prisoner in solitary confinement for an extended period of time is necessitated by the debilitating effect such confinement can have on a prisoner”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
McClary v. Kelly
judicial review of prison officials' justification for holding a prisoner in solitary confinement for an extended period of time is necessitated by the debilitating effect such confinement can have on a prisoner
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Helton
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
See United States v. Scales, 594 F.2d 558 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 2168 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1979); and United States v. Campbell, 845 F.2d 1374 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 5.Ct. 259, 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
InstyBit, Inc. v. Poly-Tech Industries, Inc.
See Hartford House, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 846 F.2d 1268, 1272 (10th Cir.) (Hartford House), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Fuddruckers, Inc. v. Doc’s B.R.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael K. Hebeka
See United States v. Campbell, 845 F.2d 1374 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 259 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Joyce L. Walmer v. United States Department of Defense and Department of the Army
See Hartford House, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 846 F.2d 1268, 1270 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles v. Cotter
See Devenport v. DeRobertis, 653 F.Supp. 649, 659 (N.D.Ill.1987), modified on other grounds and aff'd, 844 F.2d 1310 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jorge VEGA and Eusebio Leon, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. KODAK CARIBBEAN, LTD., Defendant, Appellee
See Bodnar v. Synpol, Inc., 843 F.2d 190, 193-94 (5th Cir.) (holding that the risk, shared by all company employees, that appellants’ posts would be eliminated if too few accepted an early retirement plan did not constitute a “working condition! ] ... so intolerable as to force appellants’ resignation”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Calhoun, 798 F.2d at 561 (stating that an employee is not “guaranteed a working environment free from stress”) (quoting Bristow v. Daily Press, Inc., 770 F.2d 1251, 1255 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1082…
discussed
Cited "see"
Wolford v. Budd Co.
See Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F.2d 1108 , 1114 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Quillen v. International Playtex, Inc., 789 F.2d 1041, 1042 (4th Cir. 1986); Sensenbrenner v. Rust, Orling & Neale, Architects, Inc., 236 Va. 419 , 424 n. 4, 374 S.E.2d 55 , 57 n. 4 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
NAACP Labor Committee v. Laborers' International Union
See Garrett v. General Motors Corp., 844 F.2d 559 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 259 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Cleveland Newspaper Guild v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co., 889 F.2d 1147 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 234 (1988); Jeffries v. Chicago Transit Auth., 770 F.2d 676 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1050 , 106 S.Ct. 1273 , 89 L.Ed.2d 581 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paulino
See United States v. Campbell, 845 F.2d 1374, 1381 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 259 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Gomez, 803 F.2d at 257-58; United States v. Seelig, 622 F.2d 207, 214 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 869 , 101 S.Ct. 206 , 66 L.Ed.2d 89 (1980); Scales, 594 F.2d at 564 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Celso Lopez, A/K/A Celso Lopez Lopez v. R.D. Garriga
See Davenport v. DeRobertis, 844 F.2d 1310, 1313-14 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); cf. Blake v. Hall, 668 F.2d 52, 54 (1st Cir.1981) (no preclusive effect when purport of jury verdict unclear), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2257 , 72 L.Ed.2d 862 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Local 2-286 v. Amoco Oil Company (Salt Lake City Refinery)
(2×)
See Hartford House, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 846 F.2d 1268, 1270 (10th Cir.) (“Unless the district court abuses its discretion, commits an error of law, or is clearly erroneous in its preliminary factual findings, the appellate court may not set aside the injunction.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988). 7 The parties agree that their dispute over Amoco’s right to unilaterally implement a drug testing program is arbitrable, and they do not contend that this dispute is a collateral one rather than the underlying dispute. 8 We therefore turn immediately …
discussed
Cited "see"
PaF Srl v. Lisa Lighting Co., Ltd.
Tr. 249-53; See Hartford House, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 846 F.2d 1268, 1272 (10th Cir.) (a combination of features may be nonfunctional and thus protectable, even though the combination includes functional features), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); see also Schwinn Bicycle, 678 F.Supp. at 1351 (trade dress protection depends on whether the design as a whole is functional, not whether component features viewed individually are functional); cf. Sunbeam Corp. v. Equity Industries Corp., 635 F.Supp. 625, 636 (E.D.Va.1986) (where the overall design is found t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyd v. Anderson
“Where movement is denied and muscles are allowed to atrophy, the health of the individual is threatened, and the state’s constitutional obligation is compromised.” Stewart v. McGinnis, 800 F.Supp. 604, 615 (N.D.Ill.1992) aff'd, 5 F.3d 1031 (7th Cir. 1993); cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1121 , 114 S.Ct. 1075 , 127 L.Ed.2d 393 (1994); see also Davenport v. DeRobertis, 844 F.2d 1310 (7th Cir.), cert. denied by Lane v. Davenport, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988) (Seventh Circuit “not disposed to quarrel” with a determination that only one hour of out-of-cell exercise a wee…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,067 Ralph Kampen Katherine Kampen v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F.2d 1108, 1115 (4th Cir.) (holding that, under Virginia law, "an adequate warning does not foreclose a design defect claim in either warranty or tort”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Uloth v. City Tank Corp., 376 Mass. 874 , 384 N.E.2d 1188, 1192 (1978) (declining to adopt a rule that "there can be no negligent design ... if adequate warnings are given”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramirez v. Holmes
See also Davenport v. DeRobertis, 844 F.2d 1310, 1316 (7th Cir.) (Posner, J.) (modifying injunction requiring three showers per week to require only one), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lisa Frank, Inc. v. Impact International, Inc.
Fuddruckers, 826 F.2d at 842 (quoting Falcon Rice Mill v. Community Rice Mill, 725 F.2d 336, 346 (5th Cir.1984)) (quoting Chevron Chemical Co. v. Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc., 659 F.2d 695, 703 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 457 U.S. 1126 , 102 S.Ct. 2947 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1342 (1982)); see also Hartford House, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 846 F.2d 1268 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988) (overall appearance of greeting cards afforded trade dress protection).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Turtle Wax, Inc. v. First Brands Corp.
Id.; see also Hartford House, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 846 F.2d 1268, 1271 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Spraying Systems Co. v. Delavan, Inc., 762 F.Supp. 772, 782 (N.D.Ill.1991) (Shadur, J.); Accurate Leather & Novelty Co. v. LTD Commodities, Inc., 18 U.S.P.Q.2d 1327 , 1330, 1990 WL 205865 (N.D.Ill.1990) (Duff, J.) (“The fact that common indistinct elements are combined does not undermine *1320 the fact that the combination of these items is distinctive.”)- Consistent with Roulo and comparable authorities, the Court agrees with…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoppe v. G.D. Searle & Co.
See, e.g., Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F.2d 1108, 1111-14 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Stephens v. G.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Van Poyck v. Dugger
See e.g., Davenport v. DeRobertis, 844 F.2d 1310 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d 1115 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1042 , 103 S.Ct. 1438 , 75 L.Ed.2d 795 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwartz v. Volvo North America Corp.
See, e.g., Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F.2d 1108 (4th Cir.1988) (Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act does not preempt common law claims), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Ferebee, supra, 736 F.2d at 1539-43 (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act does not preempt common law tort suits); Raymond v. Riegel Textile Corp., 484 F.2d 1025 (1st Cir.1973) (Flammable Fabrics Act does not preempt common law claims); Hubbard-Hall Chemical Co. v. Silverman, 340 F.2d 402 (1st Cir. 1965) (same as Ferebee ); Burch v. Amsterdam Corp., 366 A.2d 1079 (D.C.App. 1976…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Jamison-Bey v. James H. Thieret
See e.g., Davenport v. DeRobertis, 844 F.2d 1310 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988) (minimum of five hours of exercise per week is required under certain circumstances); Wells v. Franzen, 777 F.2d 1258 (7th Cir.1985) (minimum of exercise, showers, clothing and sanitary eating conditions required).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.
See, e.g., Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co. (C.A. 4,1988), 844 F. 2d 1108, 1113-1114 , certiorari denied (1988), 488 U.S___, 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Durango Herald, Inc. v. Riddle
Stormor, 587 F.Supp. at 280 ; see also Hartford House, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, 647 F.Supp. 1533, 1544 (D.Colo.1986), aff'd, 846 F.2d 1268 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garrett
v.
General Motors Corp.
v.
General Motors Corp.
No. 88-255.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. New York (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.