green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"Carlin III"
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dial Information Services Corporation Of New York v. Richard L. Thornburgh
(2×)
carlin iii
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Shea on Behalf of American Reporter v. Reno
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The question is whether the' challenged provision of the CDA is a “narrowly drawn regulation[] designed to serve [the government’s] interestf ] without unnecessarily interfering, with First Amendment freedoms.” Sable Communications, 492 U.S. at 126 , 109 S.Ct. at 2836 (internal quotation marks omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael K. Topalian, Don W. Boyett, Bobby McDonald Mjm Ventures, Richard H. Manuel, Jack E. Borroughs and Charles W. Anderson v. John N. Ehrman, Rockwood Insurance Company, Michael K. Topalian, Warren B. Fienga, Richard H. Manuel, Don W. Boyett, Bobby W. McDonald Charles F. Lacelle and Mjm Ventures, Plaintiffs-Counter v. John N. Ehrman, Etc., Ehrman Investment Group, Inc., Defendant-Counter and Onshore Exploration Ltd. 1984 Mid-Year Drilling Program, Counter Michael K. Topalian v. John N. Ehrman, Individually, Etc.
(2×)
See Corwin v. Marney, Orton Invs., 843 F.2d 194, 197 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 305 , 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988), citing Breen v. Centex Corp., 695 F.2d 907, 911 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Topalian v. Ehrman
(2×)
See Corwin v. Marney, Orton Invs., 843 F.2d 194, 197 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 305 , 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988), citing Breen v. Centex Corp., 695 F.2d 907, 911 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billy Lee Arlen
(2×)
See United States v. Bradshaw, 840 F.2d 871 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 305 , 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988); United States v. Mitcheltree, 940 F.2d 1329 (10th Cir.1991); United States v. Cambra, 933 F.2d 752 (9th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Becker A/k/a/ \Steven Fox\" A/k/a/ \"Dr. Fox\". Appeal of Stephen Becker"
(2×)
See United States v. Aguilar, 843 F.2d 155, 157-58 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 305 , 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
(4×)
Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568, 575 , 108 S.Ct. 1392 , 99 L.Ed.2d 645 (1998) ("[E]very reasonable construction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality.") (quoting Hooper v. California, 155 U.S. 648, 657 , 15 S.Ct. 207 , 39 L.Ed. 297 (1895)); see also Carlin Communications, Inc. v. FCC, 837 F.2d 546 , 560-61 (2d Cir.1988) (finding that as "the presumption is in favor of severability," the court "dropped" the "invalid part" from an FCC regulation, i.e., the words "or indecent," because "the remainder of the statute is fully operative."), cert, denied 488 U.S. 924 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wenzel v. Patrick Petroleum Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Corwin v. Marney, Orton Investments, 843 F.2d 194, 198 (5th Cir.) (refusing to impute constructive knowledge of information found in state records for federal securities law purposes despite that state law imposes constructive knowledge), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 924 , 109 S.Ct. 305 , 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988); Briskin v. Ernst & Ernst, 589 F.2d 1363, 1368 (9th Cir.1978) (refusing to decide as a matter of law that a reasonably prudent person would check SEC filings to verify the terms of a transaction).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morton et ux.
v.
Gardner, Executive Director, Department of Natural Resources of Florida
v.
Gardner, Executive Director, Department of Natural Resources of Florida
No. 88-12.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.