green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Amy Travel Service, Inc., Resort Performance, Inc., Resort Telemarketing, Inc., Thomas P. McCann Ii, and James F. Weiland
See United States v. Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d 706 (7th Cir.1988); see also Caplin & Drysdale v. United States, 837 F.2d 637 (4th Cir.) (en banc), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 352 (1988); but see United States v. Monsanto, 852 F.2d 1400 (2d Cir.), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ismail v. Cohen
But see Jett v. Dallas Independent School Dist., 798 F.2d 748 (5th Cir.1986), reh’g denied, 837 F.2d 1244 (1988), cert. granted — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 363 , *247 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988). 2 “Most of the courts that have addressed the question have held that respondeat superior does apply to § 1981 actions against public employers.” Springer v. Seaman, 821 F.2d 871, 880 (1st Cir.1987) (footnote omitted). 3 See also Dickerson v. City Bank & Trust Co., 590 F.Supp. 714 (D.Kan.1984); Haugabrook v. City of Chicago, 545 F.Supp. 276 (N.D.Ill.1982); Jones v. Local 520, Int’l Union of Operating En…
cited
Cited "see"
Fairbrother v. Connecticut, Department of Mental Health & Addiction Services
See Loudermill v. Cleveland Bd. Of Educ., 488 U.S. 941 , 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Millan-Colon
See United States v. Monsanto, 852 F.2d 1400 (2d Cir.), cert. granted, 488 U.S. 941 , 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988), rev'd, 491 U.S. 600 , 109 S.Ct. 2657 , 105 L.Ed.2d 512 (1989), on remand, 924 F.2d 1186 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 382 , 116 L.Ed.2d 333 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Heil Co. v. Snyder Industries, Inc.
See Loudermill v. Cleveland Bd. of Educ., 844 F.2d 304 , 309 (6th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied 488 U.S. 941 , 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Escanaba and Lake Superior Railroad Company
See Loudermill v. Cleveland Bd. of Educ., 844 F.2d 304 , 308 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewandowski v. Two Rivers Public School District
See Jett v. Dallas Independent School District, 798 F.2d 748, 755 (5th Cir.1986), cert. granted on other grounds, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roger G. Flittie v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South Dakota
See Cook v. Maleng, 847 F.2d 616 (9th Cir.1988), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988); Aziz v. Leferve, 830 F.2d 184 (11th Cir.1987); Young v. Lynaugh, 821 F.2d 1133 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 503 , 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1040 , 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988); Harrison v. Indiana, 597 F.2d 115 (7th Cir.1979); Lyons v. Brierley, 435 F.2d 1214 (3d Cir.1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calvin Kuhlman, and Ernest Huertas v. Seattle Housing Authority Seattle Housing Authority, a Body Corporate and Politic Harry Thomas, Individually and as Executive Director of Seattle Housing Authority Gloria Terjung, Individually as Personal Manager of Seattle Housing Authority Marlaina Kiner, Individually and as an Employee of Seattle Housing Authority Fred Kay, Individually and as an Employee of Seattle Housing Authority Ron Judd, Individually and as a Member of the Seattle/king County Building and Trades Council Pat Deminko, Individually and as a Member of the Seattle/king County Building and Trades Council John 1-5 Does Jane 1-5 Does, Ernest E. Huertas v. Seattle Housing Authority Seattle Housing Authority, a Body Corporate and Politic Harry Thomas, Individually and as Executive Director of Seattle Housing Authority Gloria Terjung, Individually as Personal Manager of Seattle Housing Authority Marlaina Kiner, Individually and as an Employee of Seattle Housing Authority Fred Kay, Individually and as an Employee of Seattle Housing Authority Ron Judd, Individually and as a Member of the Seattle/king County Building and Trades Council Pat Deminko, Individually and as a Member of the Seattle/king County Building and Trades Council John 1-5 Does Jane 1-5 Does
See Loudermill, 470 U.S. at 545-46 , 105 S.Ct. at 1495 ; see also Loudermill v. Cleveland Bd. of Educ., 844 F.2d 304 , 310-11 (6th Cir.) (in further proceedings after remand from the Supreme Court, the court determined that a meeting with the supervisor and four days to respond was sufficient due process), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 941 , 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 41,325 United States of America v. Clyde D. Brown Sharon Brown and Clyde D. Brown, M.D. And Associates, Inc.
See, e.g., Loudermill v. Cleveland Bd. of Educ., 844 F.2d 304 , 308 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 941 , 946, 109 S.Ct. 363 , 377, 102 L.Ed.2d 353 , 365 (1988). 18 U.S.C. § 1345 , sometimes referred to as the fraud injunction statute, came into existence as part of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, Pub.L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bettio v. Village of Northfield
See also Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education, 844 F.2d 304, 311-12 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 941 , 109 S.Ct. 363 , 102 L.Ed.2d 353 (1988) (due process satisfied where employee is given notice of the charges, sees the evidence against him, and is given an opportunity to respond); Sutton v. Cleveland Board of Education, 726 F.Supp. 657, 659-60 (N.D.Ohio 1989), appeal dismissed 886 F.2d 330 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jett
v.
Dallas Independent School District and Dallas Independent School District v. Jett
v.
Dallas Independent School District and Dallas Independent School District v. Jett
No. 87-2084; No. 88-214.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1988.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted in No. 87-2084 limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Certiorari granted in No. 88-214. Cases consolidated and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.