Terco, Inc. v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 488 U.S. 818 (1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Terco, Inc. v. Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 488 U.S. 818 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: The Utility Reform Project v. Bonneville Power Administration and Peter Johnson, Administrator, Washington Water Power Company, Respondent/intervenor. Public Utility District No. 1 of Clark County, a Washington Municipal Corporation v. Bonneville Power Administration Peter J. Johnson, Administrator of Bonneville Power Administration Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington Corporation Washington Water Power Company, a Washington Corporation Portland General Electric Company, an Oregon Corporation, City of Bonners Ferry, Idaho City of Burley, Idaho City of Centralia, Washington Clearwater Power Co., Idaho City of Declo, Idaho East and Mutual Electric Co., Idaho v. Bonneville Power Administration Peter T. Johnson, Administrator of Bonneville Power Administration Puget Sound Power & Light Company Pacific Power & Light Company Portland General Electric Co., Columbia Rural Electric Association, Inc., Blachly-Lane County Cooperative Electric Association, Columbia Basin Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Bonneville Power Administration Peter T. Johnson, Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Washington Power Co. Portland General Electric Co. Pacific Power & Light Co. And Washington Public Power Supply System (ca9, 1989-06-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" The Utility Reform Project v. Bonneville Power Administration and Peter Johnson, Administrator, Washington Water Power Company, Respondent/intervenor. Public Utility District No. 1 of Clark County, a Washington Municipal Corporation v. Bonneville Power Administration Peter J. Johnson, Administrator of Bonneville Power Administration Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington Corporation Washington Water Power Company, a Washington Corporation Portland General Electric Company, an Oregon Corporation, City of Bonners Ferry, Idaho City of Burley, Idaho City of Centralia, Washington Clearwater Power Co., Idaho City of Declo, Idaho East and Mutual Electric Co., Idaho v. Bonneville Power Administration Peter T. Johnson, Administrator of Bonneville Power Administration Puget Sound Power & Light Company Pacific Power & Light Company Portland General Electric Co., Columbia Rural Electric Association, Inc., Blachly-Lane County Cooperative Electric Association, Columbia Basin Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Bonneville Power Administration Peter T. Johnson, Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Washington Power Co. Portland General Electric Co. Pacific Power & Light Co. And Washington Public Power Supply System
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
Thus, we will uphold BPA's interpretations of the Bonneville Project Act and the Regional Act if they are reasonable. 6 Aluminum Co. of America v. Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility Dist., ("ALCOA") 467 U.S. 380 , 104 S.Ct. 2472 , 81 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); accord, California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Comm'n v. Bonneville Power Admin., 831 F.2d 1467 , 1472 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 58 , 102 L.Ed.2d 36 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Utility Reform Project v. Bonneville Power Administration
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
Thus, we will uphold BPA’s interpretations of the Bonneville Project Act and the Regional Act if they are reasonable. 6 Aluminum Co. of America v. Central Lincoln Peoples’ Utility Dist., (“ALCOA”) 467 U.S. 380 , 104 S.Ct. 2472 , 81 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); accord, California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Comm'n v. Bonneville Power Admin., 831 F.2d 1467, 1472 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 58 , 102 L.Ed.2d 36 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lee v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Rogers, 640 S.W.2d at 264 ; see, e.g., In re Marriage of Rutland, 729 S.W.2d 923, 925 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (failure to object to admission of evidence regarding religious beliefs and practices waived any error regarding admission of that evidence), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 818 , 109 S.Ct. 58 , 102 L.Ed.2d 36 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Terco, Inc.
v.
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
No. 87-1808.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
488 U.S. 818
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.