green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Acosta v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 835 F.2d 1369 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom, Griffin v. Ford Motor Co., 488 U.S. 822 , 109 S.Ct. 68 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 *1105 (1988); Brackenridge v. Ametek, Inc., 517 So.2d 667 (Fla. 1987), appeal dism. and cert. denied, 488 U.S. 801 , 109 S.Ct. 30 , 102 L.Ed.2d 9 (1988); Olympic Products Co. v. Roof Systems, Inc., 79 N.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Prahl v. United States Mineral Products Co.
See Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 635 F.Supp. 45 (N.D.Fla.1986), aff'd, 835 F.2d 1369 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 822 , 109 S.Ct. 68 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988); Williams v. American Laundry Mach.
discussed
Cited "see"
Board of Managers of Glen Mills Schools v. West Chester Areas School District
See Neiderhiser v. The Borough of Berwick, 840 F.2d 213, 218 (3d Cir.) (video store operator stated a claim for denial of substantive due process when the Borough denied a zoning exemption because it was concerned about the “adult” nature of the videos he planned to sell), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 822 , 109 S.Ct. 67 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988); DeMutis v. Borough of Phoenixville, No. 90-3519, 1990 WL 96100 , 1990 U.S. Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Acosta
R.R. v. White, 243 U.S. 188, 198 , 37 S.Ct. 247, 250 , 61 L.Ed. 667 (1917); see Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 835 F.2d 1369 , 1374 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 822 , 109 S.Ct. 68 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988); see also Acosta v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 592 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
See Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 835 F.2d 1369 , 1371-72 n. 2 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 488 U.S. 822 , 109 S.Ct. 68 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988); Anderson v. M.W.
cited
Cited "see"
Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corporation
See Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 835 F.2d 1369 , 1371-72 n. 2 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., 488 U.S. 822 , 109 S.Ct. 68 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988); Anderson v. M.W.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Karr v. Castle
See generally Neiderhiser v. Borough of Berwick, 840 F.2d 213, 218 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 822 , 109 S.Ct. 67 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988) (If the “exemption was denied for no reason other than that it possessed a certain type of movie for rent or resale ..., [then plaintiff] plainly states a cause of action based on a violation of due process, since a denial based on nothing other than the subject matter of the films it distributed would be arbitrary or irrational.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carr v. Town of Dewey Beach
See generally Neiderhiser v. Borough of Berwick, 840 F.2d 213, 217-18 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 67 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988) (video store owner denied zoning permit because of contents of some movies he sells or rents may have a substantive due process claim under Bello); de Botton v. Marple Twp., 689 F.Supp. 477, 481 (E.D.Pa.1988) (arbitrary refusal to grant curative amendment from denial of zoning variance may amount to violation of substantive due process under Bello).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Holt Cargo Systems, Inc. v. Delaware River Port Authority
See DeBlasio, 53 F.3d at 601 n. 10; see also Neiderhiser v. Borough of Berwick, 840 F.2d 213, 217-18 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 822 , 109 S.Ct. 67 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carr v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
See, e.g., Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 835 F.2d 1369 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 822 , 109 S.Ct. 68 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988) (upholding Florida’s 12-year products liability statute of repose against a 14th amendment due process and equal protection challenge); Bowman v. Niagara Machine and Tool Works, Inc., 832 F.2d 1052 (7th Cir.1987) (upholding the constitutionality of Indiana’s 10 year products liability statute of repose against a 14th amendment equal protection challenge); Mathis v. Eli Lilly and Co., 719 F.2d 134 (6th Cir.1983) (upholding the constitutionality of Tennesse…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Victoria Grimesy Lisa M. Mayo Erika Smith Lucy Rico Michelle Boles Gina Mosqueda v. Jesse Huff, Director, State Department of Finance State Department of Finance, Linda McMahon Director, State Department of Social Services State Department of Social Services, Defendants/third-Party-Plaintiffs/appellees v. Otis R. Bowen, as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and the United States Department of Health & Human Services, Third-Party
See, e.g., Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 835 F.2d 1369 , 1373 (11th Cir.) (holding no Fourteenth Amendment violation in the retroactive application of twelve year statute of repose that barred plaintiffs' relief), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 68 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988); Hammond, 786 F.2d at 12 (upholding application of statute substituting the United States as defendant in nuclear testing litigation that operated to bar plaintiffs' recovery); Hudson County Welfare Dep't v. Roedel (In re Roedel), 34 B.R. 689, 694 (D.N.J.1983) (holding that debtor had no "vested right" to discharge …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grimesy v. Huff
See, e.g., Eddings v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 835 F.2d 1369 , 1373 (11th Cir.) (holding no Fourteenth Amendment violation in the retroactive application of twelve year statute of repose that barred plaintiffs’ relief), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 68 , 102 L.Ed.2d 44 (1988); Hammond, 786 F.2d at 12 (upholding application of statute substituting the United States as defendant in nuclear testing litigation that operated to bar plaintiffs’ recovery); Hudson County Welfare Dep’t v. Roedel (In re Roedel), 34 B.R. 689, 694 (D.N.J.1983) (holding that debtor had no “vested right” to d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Koziara
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 87-1963.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.