green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Sergio Rodriguez v. Raymours Furniture(074603)
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 334 , 537 A.2d 652 (stating that LAD seeks “nothing less than the eradication of the cancer of discrimination” (quotation marks and citations omitted), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Santiago v. New York & New Jersey Port Authority
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 337-38 , 537 A.2d 652 (finding notice requirements inapplicable to LAD claims), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); Owens v. Feigin, 194 N.J. 607, 613-14 , 947 A.2d 653 (2008) (holding the notice requirements do not apply to claims under the CRA); Racanelli v. Cnty. of Passaic, 417 N.J.Super. 52, 59 , 8 A.3d 782 (App.Div.2010) (holding the notice requirements do not apply to CEPA claims).
discussed
Cited "see"
Owens v. Feigin
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 337-38 , 537 A.2d 652 (finding TCA’s notice requirements inapplicable to LAD claims), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); Brook v. April, 294 N.J.Super. 90, 100 , 682 A.2d 744 (App.Div.1996) (holding that TCA’s requirements are inapplicable to claims brought under Workers’ Compensation Law); see also Brennan v. Norton, 350 F.3d 399, 431-33 (3d Cir.2003) (predicting that our Court would not find TCA’s notice requirements applicable to CEPA actions); Lakes v. Brigantine, 396 N.J.Super. 65, 69 , 931 A.2d 622 (Law Div.200…
discussed
Cited "see"
Berner v. ENCLAVE CONDO. ASS'N
See generally Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 334 , 537 A. 2d 652 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1988). [1] In granting Enclave summary judgment as to plaintiff, the motion judge, focusing upon N.J.S.A. 10:5-3 and our decision in Catalane v. Gilian Instrument Corp., 271 N.J.Super. 476 , 638 A. 2d 1341 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 136 N.J. 298 , 642 A. 2d 1006 (1994), said in part: I'm satisfied that the reading of 10:5-3 is consistent with the interpretation by Catalane .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lowe v. Zarghami
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 330-31 , *615 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied sub. nom., University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Woodruff v. Trepel
See Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., 838 F.2d 1287, 1298 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988) (holding that “one who republishes a defamatory statement ‘adopts’ it as his own, and is liable in equal measure to the original defamer.”).
cited
Cited "see"
CFMT, Inc. v. Steag Microtech, Inc.
See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1051 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen v. Krause
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 330-31 , 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied sub nom, University of Med. and Dentistry of N.J. v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wajner v. Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 330-31 , 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); see also N.J.S.A. 59:3-1 (a public employee is not liable for an injury where a public entity is immune from liability for that injury).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Does
See Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Suriano v. Gaughan
Accord Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc., 838 F.2d 1287 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); Guccione v. Hustler Magazine, Inc., 800 F.2d 298 (2nd Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1091 , 107 S.Ct. 1303 , 94 L.Ed.2d 158 (1987); Bryan v. Massachusetts Mut.
discussed
Cited "see"
Geffner v. Linear Rotary Bearings, Inc.
The Asserted Invalidity of the Geff-ner ’128 Patent as Anticipated by the Prior Art “Under 35 U.S.C. § 282 , a patent is presumed valid, and an attack on its validity requires proof of facts by ‘clear and convincing evidence....”’ Buildex Inc. v. Kason Indus., 849 F.2d 1461, 1463 (Fed.Cir.1988) (quoting American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1360 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 83 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984)); see Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1050 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (…
cited
Cited "see"
McCreary v. United States
See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1057 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunter v. Hartman
See Liberty Lobby v. Dow Jones & Co., 838 F.2d 1287, 1292 (D.C.Cir.) (“Where the question of truth or falsity is a close one, a court should err on the side of nonaetionability.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. McCain Foods, Ltd. And McCain Foods, Inc.
(2×)
See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1050-51 , 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1439 (Fed.Cir.) (the prior art must contain the suggestion to make the specific combination that is claimed), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); In re Geiger, 815 F.2d 686, 688 , 2 USPQ2d 1276, 1278 (Fed.Cir.1987) (obviousness is not established by combining the teachings of the prior art "absent some teaching, suggestion, or incentive supporting the combination.").
discussed
Cited "see"
Coles v. Washington Free Weekly, Inc.
See Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., 838 F.2d 1287, 1292-93 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 , 110 S.Ct. 2695 , 111 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990); See New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 288 , 84 S.Ct. 710, 730 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964); Fleming v. AT & T Information Servs., Inc., 878 F.2d 1472 (D.C.Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Site Microsurgical System, Inc. v. Surgin Surgical Instrumentation Inc.
(2×)
See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1054 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
NCL Corp. v. Lone Star Building Centers (Eastern) Inc.
See Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., 838 F.2d 1287 (D.C.Cir.1988) (following extensive deposition of witnesses, it is proper for trial court to prohibit additional discovery), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Raymond G. Bond
See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1050-51 , 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1438 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc.
McGill Inc. v. John Zink Co., 736 F.2d 666, 671-72 (Fed.Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1037 , 105 S.Ct. 514 , 83 L.Ed.2d 404 (1984); accord Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1054 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); Palumbo v. Don-Joy Co., 762 F.2d 969, 974 (Fed.Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pollard
See Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., 838 F.2d 1287, 1301 (D.C.Cir.1988) (motion based upon judge’s prior ruling from bench), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); United States v. Heldt, 668 F.2d 1238, 1272 (D.C.Cir.1981) (motion based upon security measures taken by trial court), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 926 , 102 S.Ct. 1971 , 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982); United States v. Widgery, 778 F.2d 325, 328 (7th Cir.1985) (alleged knowledge of judge of disputed facts derived exclusively from trial). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1050 , 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1438 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Rohm and Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1050 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
See, e.g., Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc., 838 F.2d 1287 (D.C.Cir.1988) (because plaintiffs motions to recuse “were based entirely upon the district court’s discovery rulings in this case, their denial was clearly proper”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); Cotton v. Washington Metro.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. Harris
(2×)
See also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 334 ("[T]he overarching goal of the [LAD] is nothing less than the eradication of the cancer of discrimination." (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S. Ct. 75 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Merck & Co., Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc., 848 F.2d 1560, 1571 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied 488 U.S. 892 , 109 S.Ct. 228 , 102 L.Ed.2d 218 (1988); see also Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1053 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowles v. City of Camden
Lehmann v. Toys ‘R’ Us, Inc., 132 N.J. 587, 619 , 626 A.2d 445 (1993) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency, Sec. 219); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A.2d 652 , cert. denied sub nom., University of Medicine & Dentistry v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The B.F. Goodrich Company v. Aircraft Braking Systems Corporation, and Allied-Signal Incorporated, Defendants/cross-Appellants
Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); Webb, 742 F.2d at 1393 , 222 USPQ at 946 ; see also Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 F.2d 1044, 1050 , 5 USPQ2d 1434, 1438 (Fed.Cir.) (“The factual findings of the district court underlying the obviousness determination will be overturned on appeal only if they are clearly erroneous.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
See Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 70 , 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2312 , 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A.2d 652 , 654 cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
See Will v. Michigan Dep't of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 70 , 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2312 , 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A.2d 652 , 654 cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Aldrich v. Manpower Temp. Services
See also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 336 , 537 A. 2d 652 , cert. denied sub nom., University of Medicine and Dentistry of N.J. v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dan E. Moldea v. New York Times Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., 838 F.2d 1287, 1292 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abbamont v. Piscataway Tp.
Lehmann v. Toys `R' Us, Inc., 132 N.J. 587, 619 , 626 A. 2d 445 (1993) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency, Sec. 219); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319 , 537 A. 2d 652 , cert. denied sub nom., University of Medicine & Dentistry v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hinerman v. Daily Gazette Co., Inc.
(2×)
See also Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., 838 F.2d 1287 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988); Edwards v. National Audubon Soc’y, Inc., 556 F.2d 113 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1002 , 98 S.Ct. 647 , 54 L.Ed.2d 498 (1977); Schiavone Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
TL v. ToysR'Us, Inc.
See Huddleston v. Roger Dean Chevrolet, Inc., 845 F. 2d 900, 904-05 (11th Cir.1988); College-Town v. Massachusetts Comm'n Against Discrimination, 400 Mass. 156 , 508 N.E. 2d 587, 593 (1987); see also Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 340-41 , 537 A. 2d 652 (Handler, J., concurring), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 51 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Henkel Corp. v. Coral, Inc.
See also Uniroyal, Inc. v. Rudkin-Wiley Corp., 837 *1319 F.2d 1044, 1053 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 825 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988). 38A.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sandom v. Travelers Mortgage Services, Inc.
Compare Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 333 , 537 A.2d 652 (1988), cert. denied sub nom., University of Medicine & Dentistry v. Fuchilla, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988) (citing cases which have held that sexual discrimination is injurious and tortious).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lothschuetz v. Carpenter
See, e.g., Lib erty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., 838 F.2d 1287 , 1293 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lothschuetz v. Carpenter
See, e.g., Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Co., 838 F.2d 1287 , 1293 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 75 , 102 L.Ed.2d 51 (1988) 3 The plaintiffs requested nearly $12,000 in sanctions, but the district court only awarded a fraction of that amount.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
v.
Fuchilla
v.
Fuchilla
No. 87-2055.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Cited by 40 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.