green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“where the words of a later statute differ from those of a previous one on the same or related subject, the 769 congress must have intended them to have a different meaning.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pichler v. UNITE
where the words of a later statute differ from those of a previous one on the same or related subject, the 769 congress must have intended them to have a different meaning.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re MERCEDES-BENZ ANTITRUST LITIGATION
See Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 858 F.2d 499 , 505 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989); Allan Constr. 851 F.2d at 1532; Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp., 838 F.2d 1445, 1472-74 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 880 , 109 S.Ct. 196 , 102 L.Ed.2d 166 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guy R. Detrick Donna Detrick Fast Forward, Incorporated, and Northeast Container Corporation v. Panalpina, Incorporated Panalpina Air Freight, Incorporated Multi-Modal Freight Systems, Incorporated Multi-Modal Freight Systems of Virginia Sylvan Friedman, and American Motor Lines, Incorporated Baltimore Freightways, Incorporated Blue Star Freight Lines, Incorporated General Motor Lines, Incorporated Hagerstown Motor Express, Incorporated Jennifer Motor Express, Incorporated Maryland Transport and Storage Company Mills Trucking, Incorporated National Motor Lines, Incorporated New Windsor Express, Incorporated South Carolina Motor Express, Incorporated Tidewater Trucking Company, Incorporated U.S. Motor Express, Incorporated U.S. Transport Group Vista Motor Express, Incorporated John Does, 1-10, Guy R. Detrick Donna Detrick Fast Forward, Incorporated, and Northeast Container Corporation v. Panalpina, Incorporated Panalpina Air Freight, Incorporated, and Multi-Modal Freight Systems, Incorporated Multi-Modal Freight Systems of Virginia Sylvan Friedman American Motor Lines, Incorporated Baltimore Freightways, Incorporated Blue Star Freight Lines, Incorporated General Motor Lines, Incorporated Hagerstown Motor Express, Incorporated Jennifer Motor Express, Incorporated Maryland Transport and Storage Company Mills Trucking, Incorporated National Motor Lines, Incorporated New Windsor Express, Incorporated South Carolina Motor Express, Incorporated Tidewater Trucking Company, Incorporated U.S. Motor Express, Incorporated U.S. Transport Group Vista Motor Express, Incorporated John Does, 1-10
See Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 858 F.2d 499 , 505 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989); Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp., 838 F.2d 1445, 1472-74 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 880 , 109 S.Ct. 196 , 102 L.Ed.2d 166 (1988) 27 While the court's discussion of the fraudulent concealment claims was addressing the plaintiff's Sherman Act claims, the court later held that the plaintiff's fraudulent concealment claim within the RICO context was "as unavailing here as it was for the Sherman Act claims, for the same reasons discussed…
discussed
Cited "see"
Detrick v. Panalpina, Inc.
See Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 858 F.2d 499 , 505 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989); Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp., 838 F.2d 1445, 1472-74 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 880 , 109 S.Ct. 196 , 102 L.Ed.2d 166 (1988). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Department of Transportation
(2×)
See id., 851 F.2d at 1445-46 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Supermarket Of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
See Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 858 F.2d 499 , 505 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989); Allan Construction, 851 F.2d at 1532 ; Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp., 838 F.2d 1445, 1472-74 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 880 , 109 S.Ct. 196 , 102 L.Ed.2d 166 (1988). 26 Moreover, the principal authority upon which the court below and the dairies rely, the district court's decision in Western Paving, is hardly compelling.
discussed
Cited "see"
Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
See Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 858 F.2d 499 , 505 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989); Allan Construction, 851 F.2d at 1532 ; Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp., 838 F.2d 1445, 1472-74 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 880 , 109 S.Ct. 196 , 102 L.Ed.2d 166 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Aluminum Phosphide Antitrust Litigation
(2×)
See Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 858 F.2d 499 , 502 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989); Stegeman v. Aetna Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
West Virginia Ex Rel. McGraw v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
See Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., 858 F.2d 499, 505 (9th Cir.1988) (holding that affirmative act of denial sufficient to toll statute of limitations), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989). 3 The question of whether the acts should be independent of the conspiracy is a more difficult issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.
See Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., 858 F.2d 499, 505 (9th Cir.1988) (holding that affirmative act of denial sufficient to toll statute of limitations), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. *726 795, 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989). 4 The question of whether the acts should be independent of the conspiracy is a more difficult issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cleamtee Garner, Father and Next-Of-Kin of Edward Eugene Garner, a Deceased Minor v. Memphis Police Department City of Memphis, Tennessee
See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) 2 Garner v. Memphis Police Dep't, 600 F.2d 52 (6th Cir.1979) 3 Garner v. Memphis Police Dep't, 710 F.2d 240 (6th Cir.1983) (hereinafter "Garner II ") 4 Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 , 105 S.Ct. 1694 , 85 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985) (hereinafter "Garner ") 5 Given this court's decision in Carter v. City of Chattanooga, 850 F.2d 1119 (6th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989), discussed infra, the City and the Department in this case will most assuredly be the o…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricky Lee Sands, Muscogee (Creek) Nation and Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Cherokee, Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations, Amici Curiae
See Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Hodel, 851 F.2d 1439, 1446 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989); Cravatt v. State, 825 P.2d 277, 279 (Okla.Crim.App.1992); State v. Klindt, 782 P.2d 401, 402-403 (Okla.Crim.App.1989); State v. Brooks, 763 P.2d 707, 710 (Okla.Crim.App.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1031 , 109 S.Ct. 1769 , 104 L.Ed.2d 204 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adrain v. Alexander
See Bruegging v. Burke, 696 F.Supp. 674, 676 (D.D.C.1987) (handicapped employee with cerebral palsy not promoted to GS-11 because his overall performance and accuracy were deemed inferior to other applicants’), cert. denied 488 U.S. 1009 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Allamon v. Nichols (In Re Allamon)
Chevron Oil, 404 U.S. at 107 , 92 S.Ct. at 355 ; Accord Carter v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee, 850 F.2d 1119 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. City of Passaic
See Carter v. City of Chattanooga, 850 F.2d 1119 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989); Mitchell v. City of Sapulpa, 857 F.2d 713 (10th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Wirebound Boxes Antitrust Litigation
See Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., 858 F.2d 499, 504 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DirecTV, Inc. v. Griffin
See United States ex. rel Williams v. NEC Corp., 931 F.2d 1493, 1502, 1502 (11th Cir.1991) ("when the legislature deletes certain language as it amends a statute, it generally indicates a intent to change the meaning of the statute”) (internal citation and quotations omitted); see also Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Hodel, 851 F.2d 1439, 1444 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989) ("Where the words of a later statute differ from those of a previous one on the same or related subject, the Congress must have intended them to have a different meaning”…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Louie E. Nalley v. Patsy D. Nalley, Joyce F. Blanton v. Patsy D. Nalley
See, e.g., Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Hodel, 851 F.2d 1439, 1444 (D.C.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
General Bedding Corporation v. Angel Echevarria, Angel Echevarria Co., Inc., D/B/A Somma Mattress, and Frederick Brandau
See also Conmar Corp. v. Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), 858 F.2d 499 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989) (notice that competitor had been sued for illegally “dumping" certain merchandise not constructive notice as matter of law as to plaintiffs claim of dumping different merchandise). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony L. Chalker
“It is a canon of statutory construction that where ... the words of a later statute differ from those of a previous one on the same or a related subject, the legislature must have intended them to have a different meaning.” Klein v. Republic Steel Corp., 435 F.2d 762, 765-66 (3d Cir.1970) (footnote omitted); see also Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Hodel, 851 F.2d 1439, 1444 (D.C.Cir.1988) (same), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. Swimmer
See, e.g., Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Hodel, 851 F.2d 1439, 1444-45 (D.C.Cir.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1010 , 109 S.Ct. 795 , 102 L.Ed.2d 786 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California Land & Cattle Co.
v.
Amstar Corp.
v.
Amstar Corp.
No. 88-808.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.