green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. City of Seward
See Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Associated Builders And Contractors, Inc. v. City Of Seward
See Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989). 5 * We first address the Contractors' preemption argument that the NLRA prohibits Seward from enforcing the work preservation clause in its CBA with the IBEW. 6 In Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 475 U.S. 608 , 106 S.Ct. 1395 , 89 L.Ed.2d 616 (1986), the Supreme Court summarized its NLRA preemption case law.
cited
Cited "see"
Connelly v. Derwinski
See Harkins Amusement Enters., Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Connelly v. Derwinski
See Harkins Amusement Enters., Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 482 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation
See Harkins Amusement Enters., Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477 , 490 (9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989) (recognizing that shared monopoly theory was “novel” and holding that no § 2 claim was stated “in this case,” but declining to adopt a general rule); cf. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 948 F.2d 536, 546-49 (9th Cir.1991) (rejecting “monopoly leveraging” doctrine under § 2).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kidd v. Dalkon Shield Trust
See, e.g., United States v. Branch, 850 F.2d 1080, 1083 (5th Cir.1988) (holding that denial of a § 144 motion appropriate when a party fails to accompany the motion with an affidavit and certificate), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1018 , 109 S.Ct. 816 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989); United States v. Sammons, 918 F.2d 592, 598-99 (6th Cir.l990)(reaching same result); Davis v. Fendler, 650 F.2d 1154, 1162-63 (9th Cir.l981)(reaching same result); Galella v. Onassis, 487 F.2d 986, 997 (2d Cir.1973) (reaching same result). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Remeta v. Singletary
Hunter, 15 F.3d at 1012 ; see also Seymore v. State of Ala., 846 F.2d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir.1988) (holding that “violations of the LAD are non-fundamental defects and — absent a showing of some sort of prejudice — are uneognizable in a federal habeas proceeding”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1018 , 109 S.Ct. 816 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert F. Hagmann
Defense counsel did not object to this instruction at trial, and ‘‘[w]here an objection to a jury instruction is raised for the first time on appeal, even an inaccurate instruction will be upheld absent ‘plain error.'” United States v. Gammage, 790 F.2d 431, 434 (5th Cir.1986) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Branch, 850 F.2d 1080, 1083 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1018 , 109 S.Ct. 816 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arizona v. Standard Oil Co.
Monsanto, 465 U.S. at 764 , 104 S.Ct. at 1471 (plaintiff must “present direct or circumstantial evidence” that reasonably tends to prove that the defendants were engaged in a conspiracy rather than acting independently) (emphasis added); see also Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 485 (9th Cir.1988) (circumstantial evidence found to be sufficiently unambiguous under Monsanto), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation. State of Arizona v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Continental Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. Phillips Petroleum Co. Caribou Four Corners, Inc. And Powerine Oil Co., State of California v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Atlantic Richfield Co. Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Oregon, on Behalf of Itself, Its Residents and All Political Subdivisions Within the State Similarly Situated v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Washington, on Behalf of Itself and Its Public Entities and Residents v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co.
Monsanto, 465 U.S. at 764 , 104 S.Ct. at 1471 (plaintiff must "present direct or circumstantial evidence" that reasonably tends to prove that the defendants were engaged in a conspiracy rather than acting independently) (emphasis added); see also Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 850 F.2d 477, 485 (9th Cir.1988) (circumstantial evidence found to be sufficiently unambiguous under Monsanto ), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1019 , 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989). 17 We think that the key to the proper interpretation of Matsushita lies in the Court's emphasis on the dange…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Korea Shipping Corp. v. New York Shipping Ass'n-International Longshoremen's Ass'n Pension Trust Fund
See, e.g., Spring Branch Mining Co. v. United Mine Workers, 691 F.Supp. 973, 976-78 (S.D.W.Va.1987), aff'd, 854 F.2d 37 (4th Cir.1988) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989); Warrior Coal Co. v. Connors, 649 F.Supp. 1090, 1096-97 (W.D.Va.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Korea Shipping Corporation v. New York Shipping Association--International Longshoremen's Association Pension Trust Fund and the Board of Trustees of the Nysa-Ila Pension Trust Fund, Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association-International Longshoremen's Association Pension Trust Fund, the Board of Trustees of the New York Shipping Association International Longshoremen's Association Pension Trust Fund, Defendants-Counterclaim Delta Steamship Lines, Inc., Crowley Maritime International (Inc) and Crowley Maritime Corporation, Counterclaim Co-Defendants
See, e.g., Spring Branch Mining Co. v. United Mine Workers, 691 F.Supp. 973, 976-78 (S.D.W.Va.1987), aff'd, 854 F.2d 37 (4th Cir.1988) (per curiam), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 817 , 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989); Warrior Coal Co. v. Connors, 649 F.Supp. 1090, 1096-97 (W.D.Va.1986). 33 Second, the carriers claim that there must be demonstrable harm to the Fund to justify the imposition of withdrawal liability.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.
v.
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc.
No. 88-733.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Columbia Pictures Industries et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.