green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Chloe Z Fishing Co. v. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd.
See Teamsters Local 315 v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 856 F.2d 1307, 1314 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Mitsubishi Motors Corp., 473 U.S. at 631 , 105 S.Ct. 3346 . 18 .
discussed
Cited "see"
C. Leon Smith v. The Equitable
See Zosky v. Boyer, 856 F.2d 554, 555 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1042 , 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 L.Ed.2d 992 (1989) (examining appellate jurisdiction to review order compelling arbitration sua sponte).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Equitable
See Zosky v. Boyer, 856 F.2d 554, 555 (3d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1042 , 109 S. Ct. 868 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Steenhouse v. Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc.
See Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 855 F.2d 888 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989)(damages awarded to entertainer for symphony’s cancellation of performance causing her not to receive job offers she otherwise would have received; claim distinguished from claim for damage to reputation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Pictures Television v. Krypton Broadcasting of Birmingham, Inc.
“An agreement to make in the future such a contract as may be agreed upon at a later time amounts to nothing, is not binding, and cannot be made the basis of a cause of action.” Forgeron Inc. v. Hansen, 149 Cal.App.2d 352 , 308 P.2d 406, 411 (1957) (quoting 12 Cal.Jur.2d, Contracts, § 111); accord Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal. App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 229 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 870, 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Pictures Television v. Krypton Broadcasting Of Birmingham, Inc.
"An agreement to make in the future such a contract as may be agreed upon at a later time amounts to nothing, is not binding, and cannot be made the basis of a cause of action." Forgeron Inc. v. Hansen, 149 Cal.App.2d 352 , 308 P.2d 406, 411 (1957) (quoting 12 Cal.Jur.2d, Contracts, § 111); accord Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 229 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 870, 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stearns & Co. v. Daisy System Corp. (In re Daisy System Corp.)
See Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38, 55-56 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217 (1988)(holding that reliance that a loan would be approved based upon a failure to disclose that it might be denied was unreasonable where plaintiff knew that loans were subject to approval by the loan officer’s superiors), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 870, 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7123, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,695 in Re Daisy Systems Corporation and Daisy/cadnetix, Inc. Bear Stearns and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Bruce M. Holland Burton J. McMurtry Carl D. Carman F. Gibson Meyers Lutz P. Henckels, Creditors-Appellees v. Daisy Systems Corp., Debtor, and Jack S. Kenney, in His Capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee for Daisy Systems Corporation and Daisy/cadnetix, Inc., Trustee-Appellant
See Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38, 55-56 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217 (1988)(holding that reliance that a loan would be approved based upon a failure to disclose that it might be denied was unreasonable where plaintiff knew that loans were subject to approval by the loan officer's superiors), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 870, 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989). 48 We agree.
discussed
Cited "see"
Laborers' International Union v. Foster Wheeler Corp.
See Zosky v. Boyer, 856 F.2d 554, 558-60 (3d Cir.1988) (discussing cases), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1042 , 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 L.Ed.2d 992 (1989); cf. Goodall-Sanford, Inc. v. United Textile Workers, 353 U.S. 550, 551-52 , 77 S.Ct. 920, 921 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1957) ("A decree under § 301(a) ordering enforcement of an arbitration provision in a collective bargaining agreement is ... a 'final decision’ within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, in No. 93-5208 v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation in No. 93-5233. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. Foster Wheeler Corporation Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler Corporation
See Zosky v. Boyer, 856 F.2d 554, 558-60 (3d Cir.1988) (discussing cases), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1042 , 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 L.Ed.2d 992 (1989); cf. Goodall-Sanford, Inc. v. United Textile Workers, 353 U.S. 550, 551-52 , 77 S.Ct. 920, 921 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1957) ("A decree under Sec. 301(a) ordering enforcement of an arbitration provision in a collective bargaining agreement is ... a 'final decision' within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Land Co. Sierra Palm Partners West Lanes Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation
See Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 234 (1988) (“The tort of intentional interference with economic advantage affords a remedy for wrongful interference with an economic relationship by a third party”) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989). 8 Thus, we conclude that Brunswick has the better argument on this issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board v. City of Irving
(2×)
See Faux-Burhans v. County Comm’rs, 674 F.Supp. 1172, 1174 (D.Md.1987), aff'd, 859 F.2d 149 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1042 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 992 (1989) (“The plaintiff can point to no case law extending the preemption holding of City of Burbank to the lengths he now *169 would seek to stretch it_” Case involved land-use zoning of private airport.); Bethman v. City of Ukiah, 216 Cal.App.3d 1395, 1406 , 265 Cal.Rptr. 539, 546 (1989) (no federal preemption of state or municipal regulation of the location and environmental impact of airports.); Condor Corp. v. City o…
discussed
Cited "see"
National Westminster Bank, U.S.A. v. Ross
Sirinakis v. Colonial Bank, 600 F.Supp. 946 , 953 n. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1984); accord Kruse v. Bank of America N.T. & S.A, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217 (1st Dist.1988), ce rt. denied sub nom, Duck v. Bank of America, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869, 870 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Veranda Beach Club Ltd. Partnership v. Western Surety Co.
See Richard v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 853 F.2d 1258, 1260 (5th Cir.1988) (discussing trial court’s leeway in deciding whether jury’s answers to special questions are inconsistent), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1042 , 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 L.Ed.2d 992 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Veranda Beach Club Limited Partnership v. Western Surety Co., Frg Ventures, Inc., Veranda Beach Club Limited Partnership v. Western Surety Co., Robert F. Mongillo, Veranda Beach Club Limited Partnership v. Western Surety Co., Faneuil Hall Capital Group, Inc.
See Richard v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 853 F.2d 1258, 1260 (5th Cir.1988) (discussing trial court's leeway in deciding whether jury's answers to special questions are inconsistent), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1042 , 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 L.Ed.2d 992 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karetnikova v. Trustees of Emerson College
See Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 855 F.2d 888 , 906 & n. 21, cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989) (expressing concern that if the MCRA means that “a private university would be liable for denying tenure to a professor whose views it found politically reprehensible,” it would implicate “a very complex clash of rights" regarding “expression-related interests”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atari Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Ernst & Whinney, a Partnership Goldman Sachs, a Partnership Wilfred Schwartz, Keith Powell Merrill Lyons Michael A. Pastore Hyman Hershow Marc Laulhere Jack W. Minor, Individuals, Atari Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Ernst & Whinney, a Partnership Goldman Sachs, a Partnership, and Wilfred Schwartz, Keith Powell Merrill Lyons Michael A. Pastore Hyman Hershow Marc Laulhere Jack W. Minor, Individuals
See, e.g., Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 226 (1988) (fraudulent misrepresentation), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Christiansen v. Roddy, 186 Cal.App.3d 780 , 231 Cal.Rptr. 72, 77 (1986) (negligent misrepresentation); International Mortgage Co. v. John P. Butler Accountancy Corp., 177 Cal.App.3d 806 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 218, 225-226 (1986) (professional malpractice).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atari Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Ernst & Whinney, a Partnership Goldman Sachs, a Partnership Wilfred Schwartz Keith Powell Merrill Lyons Michael A. Pastore Hyman Hershow Marc Laulhere Jack W. Minor, Individuals, Atari Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Ernst & Whinney, a Partnership Goldman Sachs, a Partnership, and Wilfred Schwartz Keith Powell Merrill Lyons Michael A. Pastore Hyman Hershow Marc Laulhere Jack W. Minor, Individuals
See, e.g., Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 226 (1988) (fraudulent misrepresentation), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Christiansen v. Roddy, 186 Cal.App.3d 780 , 231 Cal.Rptr. 72, 77 (1986) (negligent misrepresentation); International Mortgage Co. v. John P. Butler Accountancy Corp., 177 Cal.App.3d 806 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 218, 225-226 (1986) (professional malpractice).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atari Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney
See, e.g., Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 226 (1988) (fraudulent misrepresentation), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Christiansen v. Roddy, 186 Cal.App.3d 780 , 231 Cal.Rptr. 72, 77 (1986) (negligent misrepresentation); International Mortgage Co. v. John P. Butler Accountancy Corp., 177 Cal.App.3d 806 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 218, 225-226 (1986) (professional malpractice).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atari Corp. v. Ernst & Whinney
See, e.g., Kruse v. Bank of America, 202 Cal.App.3d 38 , 248 Cal.Rptr. 217, 226 (1988) (fraudulent misrepresentation), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989); Christiansen v. Roddy, 186 Cal.App.3d 780 , 231 Cal.Rptr. 72, 77 (1986) (negligent misrepresentation); International Mortgage Co. v. John P. Butler Accountancy Corp., 177 Cal.App.3d 806 , 223 Cal.Rptr. 218, 225-226 (1986) (professional malpractice).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael James Kavanaugh, Jr. And Mary Kavanaugh, Etc. v. Greenlee Tool Company
Id. at 1161 ; see also Richard v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 853 F.2d 1258, 1260 (5th Cir.1988) (“Thus, in White we recognized the broad discretion the district court enjoys to refuse to consider interrogatories answered in violation of the court’s instructions.”), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1042 , 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 L.Ed.2d 992 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hendricks & Associates, Inc. v. Daewoo Corporation
See also Redgrave v. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc., 855 F.2d 888, 893 (1st Cir.1988) (citing Hetherington & Sons, 210 Mass, at 21), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1043 , 109 S.Ct. 869 , 102 L.Ed.2d 993 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duane Nordin v. Nutri/system, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation
Id.; see also Zosky v. Boyer, 856 F.2d 554, 560-61 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 L.Ed.2d 992 (1989); VDA, De Fuertes v. Drexel, Burn-ham, Lambert, Inc., 855 F.2d 10, 11 (1st Cir.1988) (per curiam). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Abernathy v. Southern California Edison
See, e.g., Zosky v. Boyer, 856 F.2d 554 (3d Cir.1988) (stay granted pending arbitration) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 L.Ed.2d 992 (1989); VDA, DeFuertes v. Drexel, Burnham, Lambert, Inc., 855 F.2d 10 (1st Cir.1988) (stay granted pending arbitration); Commonwealth Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ballay v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.
It provides that appeals may not be taken from interlocutory orders granting a stay of action under section 3 or directing arbitration to proceed under section 4. 3 The amendments reflected in section 15 introduce a welcome symmetry into an area of law previously distorted by “Byzantine peculiarities.” New England Power Co. v. Asiatic Petroleum Corp., 456 F.2d 183, 189 (1st Cir.1972); see also Zosky v. Boyer, 856 F.2d 554, 560 (3d Cir.1988) (pre-section 15 case examining complicated history of appealability of orders relating to arbitration), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 L…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ballay v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.
It provides that appeals may not be taken from interlocutory orders granting a stay of action under section 3 or directing arbitration to proceed under section 4. 3 7 The amendments reflected in section 15 introduce a welcome symmetry into an area of law previously distorted by "Byzantine peculiarities." New England Power Co. v. Asiatic Petroleum Corp., 456 F.2d 183, 189 (1st Cir.1972); see also Zosky v. Boyer, 856 F.2d 554, 560 (3d Cir.1988) (pre-section 15 case examining complicated history of appealability of orders relating to arbitration), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 868 , 102 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Faux-Burhans
v.
Board of County Commissioners of Frederick County, Maryland
v.
Board of County Commissioners of Frederick County, Maryland
No. 88-910.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1989.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.