green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Koppel v. 4987 Corp.
See Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 947 (2d Cir.1988) (quoting Maldonado v. Flynn, 597 F.2d 789, 796 (2d Cir.1979)), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); cf. Santa Fe Indus., Inc. v. Green, 430 U.S. 462, 477 , 97 S.Ct. 1292 , 51 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977) (refusing to construe § 10(b) to prohibit “instances of corporate mismanagement ... in which the essence of the complaint is that shareholders were treated unfairly by a fiduciary”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,418 Jay H. Koppel and Arnold E. Greenberg v. 4987 Corporation 498 Seventh Avenue Associates Peter L. Malkin Stanley Katzman John L. Loehr Martin D. Newman Wien, Malkin & Bettex and Donald A. Bettex, Garment Capitol Associates, Nominal-Defendant-Appellee
See Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 947 (2d Cir.1988) (quoting Maldonado v. Flynn, 597 F.2d 789, 796 (2d Cir.1979)), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); cf. Santa Fe Indus., Inc. v. Green, 430 U.S. 462, 477 , 97 S.Ct. 1292 , 51 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977) (refusing to construe § 10(b) to prohibit "instances of corporate mismanagement ... in which the essence of the complaint is that shareholders were treated unfairly by a fiduciary").
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. MELVIN, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Cuevas, 847 F.2d 1417, 1425 (9th Cir.1988) (holding that intimate familiarity with the conspiracy was sufficient for conviction of conspiracy), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Epstein v. MCA, Inc.
See Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938 , 946 n. 3 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrence Epstein, and Walter Minton v. McA Inc. Matsushita Acquisition Corporation Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Matsushita Holding Corporation Lew Wasserman Sidney J. Sheinberg, Lawrence Epstein John Linder Jane Rockford, as Trustee of the Michael J. Rockford Trust Maurice Karlin Ruth Karlin Beth Ann Karlin Bert P. Karlin v. McA Inc. Matsushita Acquisition Corporation Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Matsushita Holding Corporation Lew Wasserman Sidney J. Sheinberg
See Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938 , 946 n. 3 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Lee Baker, AKA \Eddie\"
See United States v. Cuevas, 847 F.2d 1417, 1428 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
See United States v. Cuevas, 847 F.2d 1417, 1428 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re VMS Ltd. Partnership Securities Litigation
Accord Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 949 (2nd Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989) (same); Townsend v. Columbia Operations, 667 F.2d 844, 848 (9th Cir.1982) (same); see also Romani v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, 929 F.2d 875 , 879 n. 3 (1st Cir.1991) (offering materials considered on motion to dismiss even though materials not attached to complaint); 5 Charles Wright and Arthur Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 1327 at 762-63 (1990). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Venture Associates Corp. v. Zenith Data Systems Corp.
See Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 949 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); Ed Miniat, Inc. v. Globe Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Upic & Co. v. Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc.
See Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 949 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
I. Meyer Pincus & Associates, P.C. v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
See Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 949 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); Furman v. Cirrito, 828 F.2d 898, 900 (2d Cir.1987); 5 C.
cited
Cited "see"
I. Meyer Pincus & Associates, P.C. v. Oppenheimer & Co.
See Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 949 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); Furman v. Cirrito, 828 F.2d 898, 900 (2d Cir.1987); 5 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kramer v. Time Warner Inc
See id., 850 F.2d at 945 . 56 In Field, however, allegedly different prices were paid by the offeror, whereas in the instant matter Warner, rather than Time, purchased the shares from its top management.
cited
Cited "see"
Ballan v. Wilfred American Educational Corp.
See Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 949 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elton E. Bryan, A/K/A Butch
See, e.g., Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 946-47 (2d Cir.1988) ("The Court held [in Santa Fe Industries ] that Section 10(b), as its plain language suggests, prohibits only conduct 'involving manipulation or deception,' ... deception being 'misrepresentation or nondisclosure' intended to deceive.” (emphasis added) (citations omitted)), *958 cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, Ltd., 681 F.2d 111, 115 (2d Cir.1982) (citing Santa Fe Indus., 430 U.S. at 473 , 97 S.Ct. at 1300-01 ) ("It is well established by now that section 10(b) was …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
See also Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 949 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); Fudge v. Penthouse Inter., Ltd., 840 F.2d 1012, 1015 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 821 , 109 S.Ct. 65 , 102 L.Ed.2d 42 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferber v. Travelers Corp.
See also Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 949 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sam Merit
Although the government argues that Merit lacks standing to protest his extradition as a violation of the treaty, in this circuit "the person extradited may raise whatever objections the rendering country might have.” United States v. Najohn, 785 F.2d 1420, 1422 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1009 , 107 S.Ct. 652 , 93 L.Ed.2d 707 (1986); see also United States v. Cuevas, 847 F.2d 1417 , 1426 n. 23 (9th Cir.1988) (same), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989). 5 .The extradition shall not take place if the crime or offence is not indictable in the place wher…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joel D. Davis, (Two Cases)
Compare, e.g., Shapiro v. Ferrandina, 478 F.2d 894, 906 (2nd Cir.) (principle of specialty arises out of treaty between two sovereign nations and, thus, is a privilege of the extraditing state, not a right accruing to the accused), cert. dismissed, 414 U.S. 884 , 94 S.Ct. 204 , 38 L.Ed.2d 133 (1973), with, e.g., United States v. Cuevas, 847 F.2d 1417, 1426 (9th Cir.1988) (individual defendant may assert objections that the extraditing nation would be entitled to raise), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Bank of Yugoslavia v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.
See Feder v. Macfadden Holdings, Inc., 698 F.Supp. 47, 50 (S.D.N.Y.1988); see also Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 949 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); Furman v. Cirrito, 828 F.2d 898, 900 (2d Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goldsmith v. Rawl
While it is true that there is no requirement to disclose each and every allegation of management misconduct or breaches of fiduciary duty, including those set forth in pending civil litigation, see 17 C.F.R. §§ 229.401 , 240.14a-101; see also Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 948 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012 , 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); United States v. Matthews, 787 F.2d 38, 48 (2d Cir.1986); Weisberg v. Coastal States Gas Corp., 609 F.2d 650, 655 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 951 , 100 S.Ct. 1600 , 63 L.Ed.2d 786 (1980); Maldonado v. Flynn, 597 F.2d 789, 79…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Craftmatic Securities Litigation
See, e.g., Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 948 (2d Cir.1988) (disclosure is required where remedy is available to prevent irreparable injury from willful misconduct of a self-serving nature and nondisclosure will lull shareholders into foregoing remedy), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); Kas, 796 F.2d at 513 (claim is not actionable under federal law if its validity rests solely on legal determination that transaction was unfair or that director breached fiduciary duty); Panter, 646 F.2d at 289 (after Santa Fe, claim is not cognizable under federal law if "cen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Craftmatic Securities Litigation v. Kraftsow
See, e.g., Field v. Trump, 850 F.2d 938, 948 (2d Cir.1988) (disclosure is required where remedy is available to prevent irreparable injury from willful misconduct of a self-serving nature and nondisclosure will lull shareholders into foregoing remedy), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); Kas, 796 F.2d at 513 (claim is not actionable under federal law if its validity rests solely on legal determination that transaction was unfair or that director breached fiduciary duty); Panter, 646 F.2d at 289 (after Santa Fe, claim is not cognizable under federal law if “cent…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Kenneth Leighnor, Jr. v. C.A. Turner, Warden, Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield, Missouri
Compare United States v. Kaufman, 874 F.2d 242, 243 (5th Cir.1989) (per curiam) (denial of petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc) (stating that only a nation that is a party to a treaty may complain of a breach of the treaty) and Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 776 F.2d 571, 584 (6th Cir.1985) (stating that “[t]he right to insist on application of the principle of specialty belongs to the requested state, not to the individual whose extradition is requested”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986) and Shapiro v. Ferrandina, 47…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wesley Bucey
See also United States v. Cuevas, 847 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir.1988) (extensive money laundering operation with several international offices constitutes a “financial institution”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989); United States v. Dela Espriella, 781 F.2d 1432 (9th Cir.1986) (defendant, a kingpin of an intricate money laundering operation who delivered cash in excess of $10,000 to his couriers, qualified as a “financial institution” possessing a duty to file CTRs).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert M. Sensi
Compare Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 776 F.2d 571, 583-84 (6th Cir.1985) ("there is a serious question whether [a defendant] has standing to assert the principle"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986), with United States v. Cuevas, 847 F.2d 1417 , 1426-27 n. 23 (9th Cir.1988) (defendant can raise doctrine-of-specialty claims "which might have been raised by the asylum state”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1122 , 103 L.Ed.2d 185 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph Affinito
The government admits that two of its allegations, which are common to all five counts of conviction, charge only that appellee deprived the government and Rockwell of their rights to the services of an honest servant. 4 While the indictment also alleges that appellee sought to obtain “money, property, and other things of value,” the government acknowledges, as it must, that “the jury may arguably have found defendant guilty because he deprived the United States and/or Rockwell of their intangible rights.” IV “Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars appeal and retrial is reviewed de …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Taylor Made Office Systems, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 88-886.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1989.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.