green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.6 score
“rjemoval is not defeated by the fact that, after the case is removed, the plaintiff files a new complaint, deleting the federal claim or stating a claim that is. not removable.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Tilson v. Forrest City Police Department
(2×)
But see Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1114 (8th Cir.1988) (finding that prosecutors were absolutely immune from liability for their actions when reviewing evidence and deciding whether to initiate a prosecution), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Jessie Tilson v. Forrest City Police Department Joe Goff, Chief, Jessie Tilson v. Forrest City Police Department Joe Goff, Chief Bill Dooley, Sgt., Individually and in His Official Capacity Dewey Ramsey, Officer, Individually and in His Official Capacity Dave Parkman, Sheriff, Individually and in His Official Capacity
(2×)
But see Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1114 (8th Cir.1988) (finding that prosecutors were absolutely immune from liability for their actions when reviewing evidence and deciding whether to initiate a prosecution), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989) 1 For example, at trial Officer Ramsey testified that he and Officer Dooley "were investigating a [murder] suspect, ran the suspect through NCIC on our police computer.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ABS Ins., Ltd. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.
rjemoval is not defeated by the fact that, after the case is removed, the plaintiff files a new complaint, deleting the federal claim or stating a claim that is. not removable.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.
rjemoval is not defeated by the fact that, after the case is removed, the plaintiff files a new complaint, deleting the federal claim or stating a claim thaf is not removable.
discussed
Cited "see"
Adams Ex Rel. Harris v. Boy Scouts of America-Chickasaw Council
(2×)
See Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1116 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lilley ex rel. Missouri Defense Bonds v. Missouri
(2×)
See Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1116 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989) (citing Kaylor v. Fields, 661 F.2d 1177, 1184 (8th Cir.1981)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lilley v. State of Mo.
(2×)
See Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1116 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989) (citing Kaylor v. Fields, 661 F.2d 1177, 1184 (8th Cir.1981)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. M/V STEIR
(2×)
See Hughes Drilling Fluids v. M/V Luo Fu Shan, 852 F.2d 840 (5th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989); Union Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
PHE, Inc. v. United States Department of Justice
(2×)
See Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989); Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Wilson v. Thompson, 593 F.2d 1375 (5th Cir.1979); Krahm v. Graham, 461 F.2d 703 (9th Cir.1972); The Video Store, Inc. v. Holcomb, 729 F.Supp. 579 (S.D.Ohio 1990); ACLU v. City of Pittsburgh, 586 F.Supp. 417 (W.D.Pa.1984); Penthouse International, Ltd. v. McAuliffe, 436 F.Supp. 1241 (N.D.Ga.1977), aff'd, 610 F.2d 1353 (5th Cir.1980); United Artists Corp. v. Glad…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Reno
(2×)
See, e.g., Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1109 (8th Cir.1988) (finding that the district court need not abstain when state prosecutors brought charges against an African American attorney in retaliation for his exercise of constitutional rights), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phelps v. Hamilton
(2×)
See, e.g., Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103 (8th Cir.), reh’g denied, 851 F.2d 1108 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989); Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Wilson v. Thompson, 593 F.2d 1375 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phelps v. Hamilton
(2×)
See, e.g., Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1109-10 (8th Cir.), reh’g denied, 851 F.2d 1108 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989); Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943, 944 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Wilson v. Thompson, 593 F.2d at 1382-83 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stone v. Holzberger
(2×)
See White by Swafford v. Gerbitz, 860 F.2d 661 , 665 n. 4 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1028 , 109 S.Ct. 1160 , 103 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989); see also Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1114-1115 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. P.H.E., Inc.
(2×)
See also Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1109-10 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989); Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943, 945 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Inc.
(2×)
See also Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1109-10 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 , 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989); Fitzgerald v. Peek, 636 F.2d 943, 945 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 3051 , 69 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981). 30 The appellants contend before us, as they did before the district court, that the First Amendment affords scant protection unless it is understood to include "a right not to be tried." United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co., Inc., 458 U.S. 263, 267 , 102 S.Ct. 3081 , 73 L.Ed.2d 754 (1982) (per curiam) (citing United States v. MacDonald, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
York v. Jones
(2×)
See, e.g., Richard Anderson Photography v. Radford University, 633 F.Supp. 1154, 1158 (W.D.Va.1986), modified, 852 F.2d 114 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1171 , 103 L.Ed.2d 229 (1989); Sabet v. Eastern Vir *428 ginia Medical Authority, 611 F.Supp. 388, 395 (E.D.Va.) (dicta), aff'd, 775 F.2d 1266 (4th Cir.1985); Johnson v. University of Virginia, 606 F.Supp. 321, 322 (W.D.Va.1985); Jacobs v. College of William and Mary, 495 F.Supp. 183, 189-91 (E.D.Va.1980); aff 'd, 661 F.2d 922 (4th Cir.). cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1033 , 102 S.Ct. 572 , 70 L.Ed.2d 477 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cincinnati Post
v.
General Electric Co.
v.
General Electric Co.
No. 88-813.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1989.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.