green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Charles Koen & Associates v. City of Cairo and Allen Moss
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 931.
cited
Cited "see"
Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Chung Family Realty Partnership, LLC
See National Farmers’ Organization, Inc. v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc., 850 F.2d 1286, 1301-1303 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S. Ct. 1535 , 103 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Message Center Management, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co.
See National Farmers’ Organization, Inc. v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc., 850 F.2d 1286, 1301-1303 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S. Ct. 1535 , 103 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Farhat v. Jopke
See Duchesne v. Williams, 849 F.2d 1004, 1006-07 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1585 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Farhat v. Jopke
See Duchesne v. Williams, 849 F.2d 1004, 1006-07 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1535 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 92-2545
See LaSalle Nat'l Bank v. County of DuPage, 856 F.2d 925 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1536 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 (1989). 7 On remand, the district court denied another motion to dismiss, but determined that an earlier state court ruling estopped the plaintiffs from claiming damages with respect to the sewer issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
LaSalle National Bank of Chicago v. County of DuPage
(2×)
See LaSalle Nat’l Bank v. County of DuPage, 856 F.2d 925 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1536 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Isaac v. State
Accord Duchesne v. Williams, 849 F.2d 1004, 1008 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1535 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 ; Brasslett v. Cota, 761 F.2d 827, 836-37 (1st Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. County of Fresno
See, e.g., Duchesne v. Williams, 849 F.2d 1004 (6th Cir.1988) (no due process violation where allegedly biased city manager held pretermination hearing for chief building inspector, but Michigan law provided for a full post-termination hearing), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1535 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 (1989); Schaper v. City of Huntsville, 813 F.2d 709 (5th Cir.1987) (no due process violation where 27. decisionmakers at pretermination stage were allegedly biased, but plaintiff was offered a post-termination hearing before a different body).” ( Walker, supra, 951 F.2d at pp. 183-184.) T…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit District
“A damage theory may be based on assumptions so long as the assumptions are reasonable in light of the record evidence.” Id., p. 673; see, e.g., National Farmers’ Organization, Inc. v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc., 850 F.2d 1286, 1301-1303 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S. Ct. 1535 , 103 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hardin v. Harshbarger
Likewise, “the bar of res judicata extends not only to questions actually decided, but also to all grounds of recovery and defenses which might have been presented in the prior litigation between the parties.” Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, 808 F.2d 1228, 1234 (7th Cir.1986) (citing Lake v. Tomes, 405 Ill. 295 , 90 N.E.2d 774 (1950)); see also LaSalle Nat’l Bank v. County of DuPage, 856 F.2d 925, 930-31 (7th Cir.1988) (interpreting Illinois law), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1536 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 .(1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jaki Walker v. City of Berkeley
(2×)
See, e.g., Duchesne v. Williams, 849 F.2d 1004 (6th Cir.1988) (no due process violation where allegedly biased city manager held pretermination hearing for chief building inspector, but Michigan law provided for a full post-termination hearing), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1535 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 (1989); Schaper v. City of Huntsville, 813 F.2d 709 (5th Cir.1987) (no due process violation where decisionmakers at pretermination stage were allegedly biased, but plaintiff was offered a post-termination hearing before a different body). 6 We agree that the failure to provide an impartial…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
H.J. Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, D/B/A Anderson Dairy Supply, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Flygt Corporation, a Subsidiary of Itt, Appellee/cross-Appellant
Success on the merits is important to a determination of the reasonableness of a fee application. "[W]here the plaintiff [has] achieved only limited success, the district court should award only that amount of fees that is reasonable in relation to the results obtained." Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. at 440 , 103 S.Ct. at 1943 ; see, e.g., National Farmers' Organization, Inc. v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc., 850 F.2d 1286, 1312 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1535 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 (1989); Williams v. Mensey, 785 F.2d 631, 640 (8th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
H.J. Inc. v. Flygt Corp.
Success on the merits is important to a determination of the reasonableness of a fee application. “[Wjhere the plaintiff [has] achieved only limited success, the district court should award only that amount of fees that is reasonable in relation to the results obtained.” Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. at 440 , 103 S.Ct. at 1943 ; see, e.g., National Farmers’ Organization, Inc. v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc., 850 F.2d 1286, 1312 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1081 , 109 S.Ct. 1535 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 (1989); Williams v. Mensey, 785 F.2d 631, 640 (8th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeffrey Panozzo v. S.A. Rhoads, Individually and as Chief of Police of the Village of East Hazel Crest
See also Duchesne v. Williams, 849 F.2d 1004, 1008 (6th Cir.1988), certiorari denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 1535 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 ; Brasslett v. Cota, 761 F.2d 827, 836-837 (1st Cir.1985) (both Circuits explicitly rejecting the argument that due process is violated if the pre-termination hearing is conducted by the individual or individuals responsible for initiating the disciplinary action).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ewald Bros., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc., a Kansas Corporation
See also National Farmers’ Organization v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc., 850 F.2d 1286 , 1289 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1535 , 103 L.Ed.2d 840 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
County of DuPage
v.
LaSalle National Bank of Chicago
v.
LaSalle National Bank of Chicago
No. 88-1258.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1989.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.