green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
“we note that in reviewing the sufficiency of the jury instructions, we must examine the charge as a whole rather than isolating and examining the deficiencies of individual instructions.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Treto
if an overt act is necessary, then the indictment must charge and the evidence at trial must show that an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy was made in the limitation period.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
50 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1099, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,295 Marcel Verbraeken, Cross-Appellant v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., Cross-Appellee
we note that in reviewing the sufficiency of the jury instructions, we must examine the charge as a whole rather than isolating and examining the deficiencies of individual instructions.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue
The court also explained that Respondents' evidence was insufficient to show unduly burdensome economic impact: "None of the [Respondents] are excluded from a business or occupation or prevented from charging a fee for services." Id. at 215 (conclusion of law 36).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown Media Corp. v. K & L Gates, LLP
See In re Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012 (7th Cir.1988) (affirming dismissal of a fraud case that, although not seeking to reverse a § 363 bankruptcy sale, sought heavy damages against the participants to the transaction that, in the Court of Appeals’ opinion, constituted a collateral attack on the validity of the bankruptcy court’s judgment), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Krilich
See In re Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012, 1018 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Dickerson, A.K.A. Lane, A.K.A. Frank Dixon
See United States v. Dynalectric Co., 859 F.2d 1559, 1581-82 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickerson
See United States v. Dynalectric Co., 859 F.2d 1559, 1581-82 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Township of Saddle Brook v. A.B. Family Center, Inc.
See Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102, 1107-09 (9th Cir.1988) (holding unconstitutional city ordinance prohibiting sexually oriented businesses from locating within 500 feet of residences or within 1000 feet of schools, churches, parks or other such businesses based on finding that “paucity of alternative sites is glaring” and that ordinance “does not allow sufficient alternatives for relocation of adult businesses.”), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989); CLR Corp. v. Henline, 702 F.2d 637, 639 (6th Cir.1983) (invalidating city…
cited
Cited "see"
Drake v. Dennis (In Re Dennis)
See In re Watford, 192 B.R. 276, 279 (Bankr.M.D.Ga.1996) citing In re Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012 (7th Cir. 1988) cert. denied 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mercer David Grayson v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Ronald L. Braley v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Tony M. Arrington v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Ricky D. Sallee v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. James L. Steadman v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. John D. Thompson v. K Mart Corporation, Cross-Appellee. Obediah Sconiers, Movants, Carl Helton, Charles W. Kempton, James E. Taylor, Bob Williams, David Jack Wright v. K Mart Corporation
See United States v. Dynalectric Co., 859 F.2d 1559 , 1580, cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989). 66 A court may hold an evidentiary hearing prior to certifying a class, see e.g., Nelson v. United States Steel Corp., 709 F.2d 675, 676 (11th Cir.1983) (Rule 23 certification); Jones v. Diamond, 519 F.2d 1090, 1098 (5th Cir.1975) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Grayson v. K Mart Corp.
See United States v. Dynalectric Co., 859 F.2d 1559 , 1580, cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flintkote Company v. United States
See United States v. Dynalectric Co., 859 F.2d 1559, 1563-65 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989); United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 600 F.2d 414, 417-18 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 884 , 100 S.Ct. 175 , 62 L.Ed.2d 114 (1979); United States v. Walker, 653 F.2d 1343, 1347 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 908 , 102 S.Ct. 1253 , 71 L.Ed.2d 446 (1982); United States v. Inryco, Inc., 642 F.2d 290, 293 (9th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 454 U.S. 1167 , 102 S.Ct. 1045 , 71 L.Ed.2d 324 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmie L. Ward
See Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102, 1106 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989); Kemmis v. McGoldrick, 767 F.2d 594, 598 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Marcus Hook Development Park, Inc. T.A. Title Insurance Company Marcus Hook Business & Commerce Center, Ltd., Assignee or Successor in Interest to Dennis H. Marchuk Bell Savings Bank and Marcus Hook Corp.
See Matter of Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012, 1018 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989) ("confirmed sales--which are final judicial orders--can be set aside" under Rule 60(b), which is made applicable to bankruptcy proceedings by Bankruptcy Rule 9024). 5 Less drastic measures include entering an order which affirms the August 14 order notwithstanding other orders to the contrary.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Marcus Hook Development Park, Inc.
See Matter of Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012, 1018 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989) (“confirmed sales — which are final judicial orders — can be set aside” under Rule 60(b), which is made applicable to bankruptcy proceedings by Bankruptcy Rule 9024). 5 Less drastic measures include entering an order which affirms the August 14 order notwithstanding other orders to the contrary.
discussed
Cited "see"
La Preferida, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. De C v. a Mexican Corporation
(2×)
See Matter of Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012, 1019 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — *909 U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Winston Inn & Restaurant Corp. v. DeMichiel (In Re Winston Inn & Restaurant Corp.)
See Matter of Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012, 1016 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Jerry R. Pippin, Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Dynalectric Co., 859 F.2d 1559, 1564 (11th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, -, 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 1642, 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heidi Baker Evan Baker, a Minor by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Heidi Baker v. I.G. Racansky Mavis Knox
See Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102, 1113 (9th Cir.1988) (the court does not “require of most government officials the kind of legal scholarship normally associated with law professors and academicians"), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lebbos v. Judges of Superior Court, Santa Clara County
"Abstention from the exercise of federal jurisdiction is the exception, not the rule," and "[a]bsent significant countervailing interests, the federal courts are obliged to exercise their jurisdiction." World Famous Drinking Emporium, 820 F.2d at 1082 . 11 Based on the teaching in Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. Garden State Bar Ass'n, 457 U.S. 423, 432 , 102 S.Ct. 2515, 2521 , 73 L.Ed.2d 116 (1982), this court has stated that three requirements must be satisfied before a federal court may properly invoke the Younger abstention doctrine: "(1) ongoing state judicial proceedings; (2) implicatio…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lebbos v. Judges of the Superior Court, Santa Clara County
Based on the teaching in Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. Garden State Bar Ass’n, 457 U.S. 423, 432 , 102 S.Ct. 2515, 2521 , 73 L.Ed.2d 116 (1982), this court has stated that three requirements must be satisfied before a federal court may properly invoke the Younger abstention doctrine: “(1) ongoing state judicial proceedings; (2) implication of an important state interest in the proceedings; and (3) an adequate opportunity to raise federal questions in the proceedings.” World Famous Drinking Emporium, 820 F.2d at 1082 ; accord Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morrow v. Winslow
See also Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102, 1106 (9th Cir.1988) (declining to address abstention issue because issue was not raised until second appeal from district court and after earlier remand from Supreme Court), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989); Shannon v. Telco Communications, Inc., 824 F.2d 150, 151-52 (1st Cir.1987) (because state did not press the abstention issue before court of appeals, court addressed merits of appeal); Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance, 587 F.2d 159 , 163 n. 6 (5th Cir.1978) ("[ajppel-lant did not raise…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spokane Arcade, Inc. And World Wide Video of Washington, Inc. v. City of Spokane
See also Walnut Properties v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102 , 1109 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989), (distinguishing between intrinsic limitations and limitations resulting from the imposition of market forces).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Balaber-Strauss v. Markowitz (In Re Frankel)
See also, In re Metr-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012 (7th Cir.1988) cert. denied, Gekas v. Pipin, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milano ex rel. Milano v. Freed
R.Civ.P. 42(b); see also Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Island Transportation Corp., 862 F.2d 10, 15 (2d Cir.1988) ("[W]hether to bifurcate a trial into liability and damages phases is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court.”), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milano v. Freed
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(b); see also Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Island Transportation Corp., 862 F.2d 10, 15 (2d Cir.1988) ("[W]hether to bifurcate a trial into liability and damages phases is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court."), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Magno J. Ortega v. Dennis M. O'connor, Director Napa State Hospital Dorothy Owen, and Richard Friday
See, e.g., Walnut Properties, Inc. v. Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102 , 1106 (9th Cir.1988) (party’s failure to challenge district court’s resolution on issue of abstention in prior two appeals precluded party’s request for abstention on third appeal), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Oyster Bay Cove, Ltd.
See also, In re Met-L-Wood Corp., 861 F.2d 1012 (7th Cir.1988) cert. denied, Gekas v. Pipin, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Topanga Press, Inc. v. City Of Los Angeles
See e.g., Walnut Properties Inc. v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102, 1109 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989) (forbidding consideration of economic factors that stem from "market force"). 22 Accordingly, we do not think that Renton forbids a court to consider economics when evaluating whether a particular relocation site is in fact part of the real estate market.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Topanga Press, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
See e.g., Walnut Properties Inc. v. City of Whittier, 861 F.2d 1102, 1109 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989) (forbidding consideration of economic factors that stem from “market force”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar Smith, Regina Smith and Gary King, Julia Thom
(2×)
The informant’s testimony was instrumental in the women’s convictions.); see also United States v. Dynalectric Co., 859 F.2d 1559, 1582 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 , 490 U.S. 1006 , 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989) (In an antitrust bidrigging conspiracy, the district court properly admitted the testimony of an employee from a conspiring company that he received an anonymous telephone call concerning the bidding the morning that the bids were received.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oliver L. North
(2×)
United States v. De Diego, 511 F.2d 818, 824 (D.C.Cir.1975); see also United States v. Dynalectric, 859 F.2d 1559, 1578-80 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 1642 , 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Leon Stewart, Robert Preston Fails
United States v. King, 860 F.2d 55 (2nd Cir.1988) (The actual *961 showing of loss is not required; the statute prohibits schemes intended to deprive victims of money or property); see also United States v. Dynalectric Company, 859 F.2d 1559, 1576 (11th Cir.1988) petition for cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1641 , 1642, 104 L.Ed.2d 157 (1989) and United States v. Aigbevbolle, 827 F.2d 664, 666 (10th Cir.1987) (distinguishing between completion of the offense under § 1341 and successful completion of the scheme to defraud).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Whittier, California
v.
Walnut Properties, Inc.
v.
Walnut Properties, Inc.
No. 88-1322.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 3, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1) · S.D. Florida (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.