green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.3 score
“if a client communicates information to his attorney with the understanding that the information will be revealed to others, that information as well as 'the details underlying the data which was to be published' will not enjoy the privilege”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
First Heights Bank, FSB v. United States
if a client communicates information to his attorney with the understanding that the information will be revealed to others, that information as well as 'the details underlying the data which was to be published' will not enjoy the privilege
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mobil Oil Corporation v. Virginia Gasoline Marketers and Automotive Repair Association, Incorporated, and Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services of Virginia, Minnesota Service Station Association Iowa Retail Gasoline and Automotive Trades Association North Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association Service Station Dealers Association of Michigan Wisconsin Retail Gasoline and Automotive Trades Association Service Station Dealers of America, Amici Curiae. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services of Virginia Virginia Gasoline Marketers and Automotive Repair Association, Incorporated, Minnesota Service Station Association Iowa Retail Gasoline and Automotive Trades Association North Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association Service Station Dealers Association of Michigan Wisconsin Retail Gasoline and Automotive Trades Association Service Station Dealers of America, Amici Curiae. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia Virginia Gasoline Marketers and Automotive Repair Association, Incorporated, and Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services of Virginia, Minnesota Service Station Association Iowa Retail Gasoline and Automotive Trades Association North Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association Service Station Dealers Association of Michigan Wisconsin Retail Gasoline and Automotive Trades Association Service Station Dealers of America, Amici Curiae
Id. at 273. 22 Like the grounds/effects distinction in Jimenez, the Attorney General's distinction between regulation of "substantive" contract terms and direct regulation of termination and renewal is invalid on the facts of this case.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Virginia Gasoline Marketers & Automotive Repair Ass'n
Id. at 273.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brasfield & Gorrie LLC v. Hirschfeld Steel Group LP
See Cox v. Administrator U.S. Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1422 (11th Cir.), opinion modified on reh'g, 30 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 1994) (“[T]he subject-matter waiver doctrine does not extend to materials protected by the opinion work product privilege.”) (citing In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619 , 625–26 (4th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S. Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of America, N.A. v. Terra Nova Insurance
See In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 625-26 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); In re Sealed Case, 676 F.2d 793, 822-23 (D.C.Cir.1982); Bowne v. AmBase Corp., 150 F.R.D. 465, 485-86 (S.D.N.Y.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blair v. State
See generally United States v. Pollard (In re Martin Marietta Corp.), 856 F.2d 619, 624 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); Nutramax Lab., Inc. v. Twin Lab.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Allard
See United States v. Mariani, 851 F.2d 595, 600 (2d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tomison
See Beckford, supra, 964 F.Supp. at 1018 -19 (citing In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 621 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied sub nom., Martin Marietta Corp. v. Pollard, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989)).
cited
Cited "see"
Angeles v. International Ass'n of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Local No. 208
See Takahashi v. Board of Educ., 202 Cal.App.3d 1464, 1478-79 (Cal.Ct.App.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Splunge v. Parke
(2×)
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2674, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4438, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5369 Jose Ortiz-Sandoval v. James Gomez, Director of Corrections for the State of California
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967, 970 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967, 970 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
WLR Foods, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
(2×)
See Jimenez v. BP Oil, Inc., 853 F.2d 268, 271 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1654 , 104 L.Ed.2d 168 (1989) (quoting Tousley v. North Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wlr Foods, Incorporated v. Tyson Foods, Incorporated
(2×)
See Jimenez v. BP Oil, Inc., 853 F.2d 268, 271 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1654 , 104 L.Ed.2d 168 (1989) (quoting Tousley v. North Am.
cited
Cited "see"
Ring v. Commercial Union Insurance
See generally In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Kenneth Clemmons v. Dewey Sowders, Warden
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 466 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1653 , 104 L.Ed.2d 167 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Rodgers
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 468-69 (6th Cir.1988) (opening the door precludes a party from complaining about the introduction of similar evidence by the opposing party), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 (1989), and cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.
See In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 622-25 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Carl Sutton, Jr. v. United States
See United States v. Ramos, 861 F.2d 461, 469 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1071 and 490 U.S. 1011 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Lilly v. Jerry D. Gilmore, Warden
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); Cramer v. Fahner, 683 F.2d 1376, 1385 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1016 , 103 S.Ct. 376 , 74 L.Ed.2d 509 (1982); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Arditti, United States of America v. Guillermo Avila
(2×)
Rule 17(c) merely requires that the moving party make a good faith effort to obtain evidence--instead of embarking on "a fishing expedition to see what might turn up." Id. at 678, 679 (holding subpoena's "catch-all provision ... not intended to produce evidentiary materials"); see In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 622 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989). 94 To this end, a party demanding materials must unfasten three locks to free the 17(c) door.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest James Perkins
(2×)
See Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967, 972 (7th Cir.1988) (error not harmless where evidence of guilt was "impressive but not overwhelming"), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Benjamin C. Taylor v. State of Indiana
The yellow glove is clearly a “nonfungible item.” See K.W., 216 N.E.3d at 516 (quoting Mateo v. State, 981 N.E.2d 59, 67 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012)) (explaining “fungible items” include “blood and drugs” and “nonfungible items” include “guns and vehicles”); Lucas v. State, 413 N.E.2d 578, 582 (Ind. 1980) (concluding blood spots on clothing did not convert that clothing from “nonfungible items” to “fungible items”). “[F]or Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 23A-CR-1625 | June 5, 2024 Page 11 of 26 ‘nonfungible items, the State need only show that the item is what it…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diggs v. State
Like other qualified privileges, it may be waived.”); see, e.g., In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 625 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989) (information voluntarily disclosed constitutes an implied waiver of attorney work product protections).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adams v. State
(2×)
Cox, 422 N.E.2d at 362; see also Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967 (7th Cir.1988) (citing Keyset and Cox in granting petition for writ of habeas corpus based on threat evidence that was unconnected to defendant), teh’g denied, cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.
See, e.g., Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1422-23 (11th Cir.1994) and United States v. Pollard (In re Martin Marietta Corp.), 856 F.2d 619, 625-26 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Millett v. Union Oil Company Of California
(2×)
See also Jimenez v. BP Oil, Inc., 853 F.2d 268, 272 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1654 , 104 L.Ed.2d 168 (1989); Atkins v. Chevron USA, Inc., 672 F.Supp. 1373, 1378 (W.D.Wash.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Millett v. Union Oil Co. of California
(2×)
See also Jimenez v. BP Oil, Inc., 853 F.2d 268, 272 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1654 , 104 L.Ed.2d 168 (1989); Atkins v. Chevron USA, Inc., 672 F.Supp. 1373, 1378 (W.D.Wash.1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance Company
See, e.g., United States v. Pollard (In re Martin Marietta Corp.), 856 F.2d 619 (4th Cir.1988), cert, denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freedman Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
(2×)
See also Jimenez v. BP Oil, Inc., 853 F.2d 268 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1654 , 104 L.Ed.2d 168 (1989); Medina & Medina v. Country Pride Foods, Ltd., 858 F.2d 817, 824 (1st Cir.1988) (certified to P.R.Sup.Ct.) (Puerto Rico Dealer’s Act does not prohibit supplier from withdrawing from the market); American Mart Corp. v. Joseph E.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Marine Midland Realty Credit Corp.
It is settled that loss of the attorney-client privilege extends “ ‘to the substance of a communication’ ... and requires the attorney to disclose ‘the details underlying the data which was to be published.” In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 727 F.2d at 1356 (quoting United States v. Cote, 456 F.2d 142, 145 (8th Cir.1972)); see also In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir.1988) (same), cert. denied Martin Marietta Corp. v. Pollard, 490 U.S. 1011 , 109 S.Ct. 1655 , 104 L.Ed.2d 169 (1989); In re Sealed Case, 676 F.2d 793, 809 (D.C.Cir. 1982) (waiver extends “to all oth…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Takahashi
v.
Livingston Union School District
v.
Livingston Union School District
No. 88-1151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 3, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Motion of Asian Pacific American Coalition for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.