green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.9 score
“while we ordinarily give great weight to the interpretation of the agency charged with enforcement of the statute we are construing, . . . that deference does not extend to the question of judicial review, a matter within the peculiar expertise of the courts.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aladetohun O. Bamidele v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
while we ordinarily give great weight to the interpretation of the agency charged with enforcement of the statute we are construing, ... that deference does not extend to the question of judicial review, a matter within the peculiar expertise of the courts.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bamidele v. INS
while we ordinarily give great weight to the interpretation of the agency charged with enforcement of the statute we are construing, . . . that deference does not extend to the question of judicial review, a matter within the peculiar expertise of the courts.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Shellef and Rubenstein
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
See id. (describing scheme); id. at 525 (holding that evidence supported the conspiracy count).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Professional Lawn Care Association v. Village of Milford
(2×)
As amended, FIFRA "establishe[d] an elaborate framework for the regulation of pesticide use in the United States." Love v. Thomas, 858 F.2d 1347, 1350 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied; --- U.S. ----, 109 S. Ct.1932, 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989); see also Defenders of Wildlife v. Administrator, EPA, 882 F.2d 1294 , 1296 (8th Cir.1989). 14 FIFRA contemplates various levels of interaction between the federal, state and local governments in the regulation of pesticides and their use.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tachiona v. Mugabe
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989) (holding that Marcos's illegal acts were not official acts pursuant to his authority as President of the Philippines, the court stated Marcos "was not the state, but the head of state, bound by the laws that applied to him”); Jimenez v. Aristeguieta, 311 F.2d 547, 557 (5th Cir.1962) ("Even though characterized as a dictator, appellant was not himself the sovereign' — government—of Venezuela within the Act of State Doctrine.
cited
Cited "see"
Roxas v. Marcos
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1360-61 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989) (Republic II).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Estate Of Ferdinand Marcos
See Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Hilao v. Estate of Marcos
See Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Electric Capital Corporation Gelco Corporation International Couriers Corporation v. N. Bud Grossman Andrew C. Grossman Richard W. McFerran Air Canada, a Canadian Corporation Peat Marwick Thorne, Formerly Doing Business as Thorne, Ernst & Whinney Deloitte & Touche, Formerly Doing Business as Touche (Usa) Deloitte & Touche, Formerly Doing Business as Touche Ross (Canada), (Canada), General Electric Capital Corporation Gelco Corporation International Couriers Corporation v. N. Bud Grossman Andrew C. Grossman Richard W. McFerran Air Canada, a Canadian Corporation Peat Marwick Thorne, Formerly Doing Business as Thorne, Ernst & Whinney Deloitte & Touche, Formerly Doing Business as Touche (Usa) Deloitte & Touche (Canada), Formerly Doing Business as Touche Ross (Canada)
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1360-61 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989); Jimenez v. Aristeguieta, 311 F.2d 547, 557-58 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 914 , 83 S.Ct. 1302 , 10 L.Ed.2d 415 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Electric Capital Corp. v. Grossman
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1360-61 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989); Jimenez v. Aristeguieta, 311 F.2d 547, 557-58 (5th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 914 , 83 S.Ct. 1302 , 10 L.Ed.2d 415 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burke v. Dow Chemical Co.
(2×)
See Love v. Thomas, 858 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir.1988) (reversing EPA suspension), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1932 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc.
(2×)
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1364 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989). .Conatech S.A. did not appear in the district court and does not appeal the issuance of the injunction. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc.
(2×)
See Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1361 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Auvil v. CBS \60 Minutes\""
See generally, Nader v. United States E.P.A., 859 F.2d 747, 749-50 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1034 , 109 S.Ct. 1931 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989) (administrative history of Alar controversy).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. Helmsley
(4×)
See United States v. Gurary, 860 F.2d 521, 525 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1931 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989); United States v. Bliss, 735 F.2d 294, 301 (8th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence M. Richey
(2×)
See Lampert v. United States, 854 F.2d 335 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 109 S.Ct. 1931 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. United States
See Rogers v. United States, 14 Cl.Ct. 39, 50 (1987) (Claims Court has no jurisdiction over discrimination claims based on Federal Civil Rights statutes), aff'd, 861 F.2d 729 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1034 , 109 S.Ct. 1930 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989); Barbee v. United States, 14 Cl.Ct. 387, 389 (1988) (Civil rights claims are outside Claims Court’s jurisdiction), aff’d, 867 F.2d 616 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 52 , 107 L.Ed.2d 20 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murakami v. United States
(2×)
See also Love v. Thomas, 858 F.2d 1347, 1356-57 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1932 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989) (approving augmentation to allow information on pesticides); Ar kla Exploration Co. v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp., 734 F.2d 347, 357 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1158 , 105 S.Ct. 905 , 83 L.Ed.2d 920 (1985) (allowing explanation of petroleum geology); Conservation Law Found, of New England v. Clark, 590 F.Supp. 1467 , 1474-75 & n. 5 (D.Mass.1984), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Madanes v. Madanes
(2×)
See, e.g., Republic of Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1358 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc) (finding RICO subject matter jurisdiction in suit by foreign country against former president and wife where defendants allegedly transferred stolen assets to United States), cert, denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989); Bank of Crete, S.A. v. Koskotas, No. 88 CIV. 8412, 1991 WL 177287 at *6 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chinyere Jenkins v. State of Missouri
See, e.g., Jenkins v. Missouri, 672 F.Supp. 400, 404 (W.D.Mo.1987), aff'd in relevant part, 855 F.2d 1295 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied in relevant part, 490 U.S. 1034 , 109 S.Ct. 1931 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. City of Medina
See also Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1362 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Lizeric Realty Corp.
Compare In re Cedar Tide Corp., 859 F.2d 1127, 1128 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 405 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Realty Trust Corp.
See, e.g., In re Cedar Tide Corp., 859 F.2d 1127, 1131-32 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 (1989); In re Martin-Trigona, 760 F.2d 1334, 1342 (2d Cir.1985); In re Feature Homes, Inc., 116 B.R. 731, 733 (Bankr.E.D.Cal.1990). 7 Next, creditors argue that liquidation is not a permissible goal in Chapter 11.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. Shell Oil Co.
See e.g., Stamps v. Collagen Corp., 984 F.2d 1416, 1424-25 (5th Cir.1993). 3 . 820 F.2d 1406 (5th Cir.1987), vacated, 862 F.2d 491 (5th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1932 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siderman de Blake v. Republic of Argentina
“The burden of proving acts of state rests on the party asserting the applicability of the doctrine.” Liu, 892 F.2d at 1432 ; see also Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1361 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siderman Blake v. Republic of Argentina
"The burden of proving acts of state rests on the party asserting the applicability of the doctrine." Liu, 892 F.2d at 1432 ; see also Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 862 F.2d 1355, 1361 (9th Cir.1988) (en banc), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1933 , 104 L.Ed.2d 404 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Rea, Getty Terminals Corp., and John Pabone, Getty Terminals Corp., William Rea, John Pabone, and John Quock
(2×)
Willfulness, as used in such a statute, means the “ ‘voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal duty.’ ” Cheek v. United States, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 604, 610 , 112 L.Ed.2d 617 (1991); see also United States v. Gurary, 860 F.2d 521, 523 (2d Cir.1988) (“In the context of [ 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (2) ], ‘willfully’ means an intentional violation of a known legal duty.”), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1931 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Villegas
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Gurary, 860 F.2d 521 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1931 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989); United States v. Gatzonis, 805 F.2d 72 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 932 , 108 S.Ct. 303 , 98 L.Ed.2d 262 (1987); United States v. Reed, 790 F.2d 208 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 954 , 107 S.Ct. 445 , 93 L.Ed.2d 393 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis E. Heydt Company v. United States of America, and Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense
See also Rogers v. Ink, 766 F.2d 430 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1034 , 109 S.Ct. 1930 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fletcher
(2×)
Lyubarsky v. United States, 479 U.S. 861 , 107 S.Ct. 211 , 93 L.Ed.2d 141 (1986); see also United States v. Gurary, 860 F.2d 521, 527 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1931 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fletcher
(2×)
Lyubarsky v. United States, 479 U.S. 861 , 107 S.Ct. 211 , 93 L.Ed.2d 141 (1986); see also United States v. Gurary, 860 F.2d 521, 527 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1035 , 109 S.Ct. 1931 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Boston v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
See, e.g., Love v. Thomas, 838 F.2d 1059 , 1064 n. 9 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1932 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blaine P. Thompson v. United States Department of Labor
See Asarco, Inc. v. EPA, 616 F.2d 1153, 1160 (9th Cir.1980); see also Love v. Thomas, 858 F.2d 1347, 1356 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1932 , 104 L.Ed.2d 403 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations
v.
Love
v.
Love
No. 88-1255.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 24, 1989.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.