green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Harloff
Duffy also states in his affidavit that he “did not provide any information derived from my participation on the CIC review of the 20 Barons St. incident to the investigators interviewing the officers for August, 1988, and ... did not direct or aid their inquiry in any way.” Id. at 1110.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Funderburk
The test of voluntariness of a confession is to be determined by viewing the totality of the circumstances and assessing whether the conduct of “law enforcement officials was such as to overbear [the defendant’s] will to resist and bring about confessions not freely self-determined .... ” Rogers v. Richmond, 365 U.S. 534, 544 , 81 S.Ct. 735 , 5 L.Ed.2d 760 (1961); accord United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 649 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1071 , 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); United States v. Guarno, 819 F.2d 28, 30 (2d Cir.1987); United States v. Ferrara, 377 F.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 97 F.3d 1090, 1093 (8th Cir.1996) (“‘Accordingly, a defendant’s right to counsel when a grand jury appearance is at issue extends only to the right to consult counsel outside the grand jury room.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Schwimmer, 882 F.2d 22, 27 (2nd Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1071 , 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Ray Lacey
See United States v. Schwimmmer, 882 F.2d 22, 26 (2d Cir.1989) (noting that on retrial, government should establish a “Chinese Wall” to bar all those persons exposed to the grand jury testimony from participation in the case), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1071 , 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Bye and Kent Bulger, Kent Bulger
In assessing the voluntariness of a defendant’s waiver of his right to remain silent and a defendant’s consent to search *9 his apartment, the proper test is whether the waiver and the consent were “the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice by [their] maker.” United States v. Arango-Correa, 851 F.2d 54, 57 (2d Cir.1988) (citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 225 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2046 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)); see United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 649 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Riggs v. City of Albuquerque
See Kowaleski v. Director, OWCP, 879 F.2d 1173, 1175-76 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); see also Torres, 487 U.S. at 317 , 108 S.Ct. at 2409 (“Nor did petitioner seek leave to amend the notice of appeal within the time limits set by Rule 4.”). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Riggs v. City Of Albuquerque
See Kowaleski v. Director, OWCP, 879 F.2d 1173, 1175-76 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); see also Torres, 487 U.S. at 317 , 108 S.Ct. at 2409 ("Nor did petitioner seek leave to amend the notice of appeal within the time limits set by Rule 4.") 2 The investigative files were found in thirty-five boxes.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steward
See United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 650 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); United States v. Leon Guerrero, 847 F.2d 1363, 1367 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Pelton, 835 F.2d 1067, 1073 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1010 , 108 S.Ct. 1741 , 100 L.Ed.2d 204 (1988); United States v. Guarno, 819 F.2d 28, 30-31 (2d Cir.1987); Layne v. State, 542 So.2d 237, 240-41 (Miss.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hien Hai Hoac, United States of America v. Hgai Choy Chan
Compare United States v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 1134, 1142 (11th Cir.1988) (Bruton violation where use of pronoun “they” in redactéd confession clearly implicated codefendants) and Clark v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 471, 477 (5th Cir.1984) (Bruton violation where redacted confession referred to “the three of us” and police witnesses testified that confessor had provided police with specific names of his accomplices), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1055 , 105 S.Ct. 1761 , 84 L.Ed.2d 823 (1985) with United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 652-53 (2nd Cir.1989) (no Bruton violation where reference to “anot…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. David J. Lindsay and D.J. Lindsay, Inc., David J. Lindsay, Cross-Appellee
See also United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 654 (2d Cir.1989) (defendant convicted for one violation of § 924(c)(1) based on three firearms seized from apartment where defendant processed and sold cocaine), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1071 , 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Broccolo
When conducting this inquiry, the court should consider “the totality of all the surrounding circumstances, which may include the accused’s characteristics, the conditions of interrogation, and the conduct of law enforcement officials.” United States v. Anderson, 929 F.2d at 99 (quoting Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. at 226 , 93 S.Ct. at 2047 )); see also United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 649 (2d Cir.1989) (“factors to be considered include ‘the type and length of questioning, the defendant’s physical and mental capabilities, and the government’s method of interrogati…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Geraldo Hernandez, Also Known as Gerardo Hernandez, Also Known as Juan Hernandez
We have previously held “that a weapon is used in connection with drug trafficking if it is kept on hand to protect [an] ‘apartment as a storage and processing point for large quantities of narcotics.’ ” United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 241 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 273 , 112 L.Ed.2d 229 (1990) (citation omitted); see also, United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); United States v. Meggett, 875 F.2d 24 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 123 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lopez
See, e.g., United States v. Schwimmer, 882 F.2d 22, 28 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990) (questioning of represented individual before a grand jury in the absence of counsel falls within the “authorized by law” exception of Rule DR 7-104 in light of Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(d), which prohibits the presence of defense counsel in the grand jury room).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Keith D. Long, United States of America v. Sonia E. Mayfield
(2×)
See also United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 654 (2d Cir.1989) (affirming section 924(c)(1) conviction where guns were found in defendant’s residence), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); United States v. Robinson, 857 F.2d 1006, 1010 (5th Cir.1988) (same); United States v. Matra, 841 F.2d 837, 840-41 (8th Cir.1988) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Faith Annette Long, United States of America v. Garrett James Barry
We distinguished eases where presentation of the redacted statement draws the jury’s attention to the fact that a name was omitted and invites the jury to fill in the blank, and cases where the redacted statement does not invite speculation. 836 F.2d at 390 -91 (citing Clark v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 471 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1055 , 105 S.Ct. 1761 , 84 L.Ed.2d 823 (1985), as an example of a case where jury was invited to fill in the blank); see also United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 651-53 (2d Cir.1989) (contrasting case that did not invite jury speculation from one that di…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Torres
See e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 654 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); United States v. Meggett, 875 F.2d 24, 29 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 123 (1989); United States v. Robinson, 857 F.2d 1006, 1010 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Matra, 841 F.2d 837, 842 (8th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Torres
See e.g., United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 654 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); United States v. Meggett, 875 F.2d 24, 29 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 123 (1989); United States v. Robinson, 857 F.2d 1006, 1010 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Matra, 841 F.2d 837, 842 (8th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Remi Pelletier and Robert Pelletier
In an attempt to preserve its convictions on the nonperjury conspiracy count, the government sought to show in the district court that all the evidence it used was “derived from a legitimate source wholly independent of the compelled testimony.” Kastigar, 406 U.S. at 460 , 92 S.Ct. at 1665 ; see also United States v. Schwimmer, 882 F.2d 22, 25 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); Unit *303 ed States v. Mariani, 851 F.2d 595, 599-601 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1654 , 104 L.Ed.2d 168 (1989); United States v. Kurzer, 534 F.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alamo Bank of Texas
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 89-785.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1990.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.