green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape Commission
he aspect of the beef promotion act which imposes assessments for research purposes qualifies as neither 'expressive' nor 'intimate' association, and therefore does not implicate frame's first amendment rights
discussed
Cited "see"
Pelts & Skins, L.L.C. v. Jenkins
See United States v. Frame, 885 F.2d 1119 (3rd Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1990), where the United States sought to recover assessments under the Beef Promotion and Research Act from a cattle buyer and produc *489 er.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mukaddam v. Permanent Mission of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations
See Board of Trustees of Employees’ Retirement System of the City of Baltimore v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, 317 Md. 72, 130 , 562 A.2d 720, 748 (1989) (observing that Springfield Rare Coin Galleries, Inc., New York Times Co., and Tayyari each involved state or local efforts to structure relationships between their residents and other nations, or citizens of other nations, or action directly aimed at certain foreign nations or their citizens), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1093 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Raytech Corp.
See New Era Publications International, ApS v. Henry Holt and Co., Inc., 873 F.2d 576, 597 (2nd Cir.1989), reh'g denied, 884 F.2d 659 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Chan Lai and Silas Brandon
See United States v. Machor, 879 F.2d 945, 951 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 (1990); United States v. Holloway, 731 F.2d 378, 382 (6th Cir.1984), after remand, United States v. Holloway, 740 F.2d 1373, 1375-76 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clarence Kayes Gene Kennedy Sharon Kennedy Wiley Lacy John R. Maurer Lester Reynolds Shirley Reynolds Hollis Rollins Donald Filby Jack Miller James Lovell Paul S. Brady Wilfred A. Blain Lloyd S. Tucker Donald J. Schoenhofer v. Pacific Lumber Company Maxxam Group, Inc. Maxxam, Inc. Charles Hurwitz Paul N. Schwartz James Iaco William Leone, Clarence Kayes Gene Kennedy Sharon Kennedy Wiley Lacy John R. Maurer Lester Reynolds Shirley Reynolds Hollis Rollins Donald Filby Jack Miller James Lovell Paul S. Brady Wilfred A. Blain Lloyd S. Tucker v. Pacific Lumber Company Maxxam Group, Inc. Maxxam, Inc. Charles Hurwitz Paul N. Schwartz James Iaco William Leone
(2×)
See United States For Use and Benefit of Reed v. Callahan, 884 F.2d 1180, 1185 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990). 119 In an ERISA action by a participant, beneficiary, or fiduciary, "the court in its discretion may allow a reasonable attorney's fee and costs of action to either party." 29 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kayes v. Pacific Lumber Co.
(2×)
See United States For Use and Benefit of Reed v. Callahan, 884 F.2d 1180, 1185 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Foote Memorial Hospital Pcis Litigation.
(2×)
See United States v. Callahan, 884 F.2d 1180 , 1185 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
E.D.S. Corp. v. W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Callahan, 884 F.2d 1180 , 1185 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. v. Leisure Time Productions, B.V.
Saratoga Vichy Spring Co. v. Lehman, 625 F.2d 1037, 1040 (2d Cir.1980); see New Era Publications Int’l v. Henry Holt & Co., 873 F.2d 576, 584-85 (2d Cir.1989) (equitable doctrine of laches barred plaintiff from enjoining publication of author’s biography when there was severe prejudice and unconscionable delay in seeking injunctive relief), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. v. Leisure Time Productions, B v. Leisure Time Productions, B v. Third-Party v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. And Columbia Pictures Entertainment, Inc., Third-Party-Defendants-Appellees, Horizon Pictures, G.B. Academy Pictures, A.G. David N. Bottoms and Hon. Raya S. Dreben, as Executors of the Estate of Samuel Speigel, Third-Party
Saratoga Vichy Spring Co. v. Lehman, 625 F.2d 1037, 1040 (2d Cir.1980); see New Era Publications Int'l v. Henry Holt & Co., 873 F.2d 576, 584-85 (2d Cir.1989) (equitable doctrine of laches barred plaintiff from enjoining publication of author's biography when there was severe prejudice and unconscionable delay in seeking injunctive relief), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coalition for Open Doors v. Annapolis Lodge No. 622
(2×)
See Lubman v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, 493 U.S. 1093 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edgar Sepulveda, United States of America v. Edward W. Welch, Jr., United States of America v. Arline S. Welch, United States of America v. Kevin Cullinane, United States of America v. Cheryl T. Johnson, United States of America v. Richard F. Labrie, United States of America v. Tony Rood, United States of America v. William D. Wallace, United States of America v. Ernest F. Langlois
See United States v. De Jongh, 937 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1991) (stating that district courts possess "considerable discretion" to fashion orders pertaining to sequestration). 10 29 Outside of the heartland, the district court may make whatever provisions it deems necessary to manage trials in the interests of justice, see id., including the sequestration of witnesses before, during, and after their testimony, see Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 87 , 96 S.Ct. 1330, 1335 , 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976), and compelling the parties to present witnesses in a prescribed sequence, see United States v. Mac…
cited
Cited "see"
Cal-Almond, Inc., a California Corporation v. United States Department of Agriculture Cal-Almond, Inc., a California Corporation, Saulsbury Orchard and Almond Processing, Inc., Carlson Farms, a Sole Proprietorship v. United States Department of Agriculture Cal-Almond, Inc., a California Corporation, Gourmet Packing Co., a California Corporation, Gold Hills Nut Co., Inc., a California Corporation v. United States Department of Agriculture Cal-Almond, Inc., a California Corporation, Gold Hills Nut Co., Inc., a California Corporation v. United States
See United States v. Frame, 885 F.2d 1119 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Cal-Almond, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture
See United States v. Frame, 885 F.2d 1119 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sepulveda
See United States v. De Jongh, 937 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1991) (stating that district courts possess “considerable discretion” to fashion orders pertaining to sequestration). 10 Outside of the heartland, the district court may make whatever provisions it deems necessary to manage trials in the interests of justice, see id., including the sequestration of witnesses before, during, and after their testimony, see Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80, 87 , 96 S.Ct. 1330, 1335 , 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976), and compelling the parties to present witnesses in a prescribed sequence, see United States v. Ma…
discussed
Cited "see"
Intercontinental Life Ins. v. Lindblom
(2×)
See HealthAmerica v. Menton , 551 So.2d 235 (Ala. 1989), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 1166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990); Olympia Spa v. Johnson , 547 So.2d 80 (Ala. 1989); Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip , 553 So.2d 537 (Ala. 1989), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 1780 , 108 L.Ed.2d 782 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schochet v. State
(2×)
See Board of Trustees v. City of Baltimore, 317 Md. 72, 97 , 562 A.2d 720 (1989), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990); Yangming Transport v. Revon Products, 311 Md. 496, 509-510 , 536 A.2d 633 (1988), and cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hodes
“Perhaps the most fundamental duty of a trustee is that he must display throughout the administration of the trust complete loyalty to the interests of the beneficiar[ies] and must exclude all selfish interest and all consideration of the interests of third persons.” Id. § 543; see also Board of Trustees v. Mayor of Baltimore, 317 Md. 72, 109 , 562 A.2d 720, 738 (1989) (“[T]he general duty of loyalty is well-established in Maryland law.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1093 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990). “[A] trustee is charged by law with representing the beneficiaries’ int…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosebud Entertainment, LLC v. Professional Laminating LLC
See also New Era Publ'ns Int’l, ApS v. Henry Holt & Co., 695 F.Supp. 1493 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) (the fair use doctrine protects against republication that offers the copyrighted work “in a secondary packaging,” such that "potential customers, having read the secondary work, will no longer be inclined to purchase again something they have already read.”), aff'd, 873 F.2d 576 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duckworth v. Deane
See e.g., Board of Trustees v. City of Baltimore, 317 Md. 72, 88-90 , 562 A.2d 720, 727-729 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1093 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990); Citizens Coordinating Comm. v. TKU, 276 Md. 705, 712-713 , 351 A.2d 133, 138 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eubanks & Eubanks, Inc. v. Colonial Pacific Leasing
Co. v. Blackwelder, 554 So.2d 329 , 334 (Ala. 1989) (claim of fraud in the inducement of an alleged employee-benefit plan did not "relate to" the plan so as to trigger federal preemption of state-law fraud action), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 948 , 110 S.Ct. 2209 , 109 L.Ed.2d 535 (1990); see also HealthAmerica v. Menton, 551 So.2d 235 , 239-40 (Ala. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1093 , 110 S.Ct. 1166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Sachse
“Perhaps the most fundamental duty of a trustee is that he must display throughout the administration of the trust complete loyalty to the interests of the beneficiar[ies] and must exclude all selfish interest and all consideration of the interests of third persons.” Id. § 543; see also Board of Trustees v. Mayor of Baltimore, 317 Md. 72, 109 , 562 A.2d 720, 738 (1989) (“[T]he general duty of loyalty is well-established in Maryland law.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1093 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990). “[A] trustee is charged by law with representing the beneficiaries’ int…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trustees of Columbia University v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.
See, e.g., New Era Publications Int’l v. Henry Holt & Co., Inc., 873 F.2d 576, 584-85 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990) *753 (finding that laches barred injunctive relief where the plaintiff failed to take any steps to enjoin infringing publication for two years and finding that the delay was “unconscionable”); Byron, 1995 WL 465130 , at *6-*7 (finding unreasonable delay where the plaintiff sent two cease-and-desist letters and then did not bring suit for seven years); McDonald’s Corp. v. Druck & Gerner, D.D.S., P.C., 814 F.Supp. 1127…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alameda Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Oakland, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, Newspaper Guild, Intervenor-Appellant
See, e.g., Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement System of City of Baltimore v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, 317 Md. 72 , 562 A.2d 720 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1093 , 110 S.Ct. 1167 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990) (holding that city ordinance requiring that city pension funds divest their holdings in companies doing business in South Africa did not intrude on federal government’s exclusive power to conduct foreign policy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monster Communications, Inc. v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
NimmeR & David NimmbR, NimmeR on Copyright (“Nimmer”) § 13.05[A][l][a], at 13-161 to 162 (1995); see also New Era Publications International, ApS v. Henry Holt & Co., Inc., 873 F.2d 576, 583 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990); Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 307 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 714 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tap Publications, Inc. v. Chinese Yellow Pages (New York) Inc.
See, e.g., New Era Publications Int’l v. Henry Holt and Co., Inc., 873 F.2d 576, 584-85 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990) (laches barred injunctive relief where plaintiff failed to take any steps to enjoin infringing publication for two years; delay was “unconscionable”); Byron, 1995 WL 465130 , at *6-7 (finding unreasonable delay where plaintiff sent two cease-and-desist letters and then did not bring suit for seven years); McDonald’s Corp. v. Druck & Gerner, D.D.S., PC., 814 F.Supp. 1127, 1137 (N.D.N.Y.1993) (plaintiff inexcusably d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc. v. Michael Espy
See also United States v. Frame, 885 F.2d 1119, 1134 (3d Cir.1989) (government has substantial interest in salvaging the beef industry), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tienshan, Inc. v. C.C.A. International (N.J.), Inc.
See, e.g., New Era Publications International v. Henry Holt and Co., Inc., 873 F.2d 576, 584 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wileman Bros. & Elliott, Inc. v. Espy
See also United States v. Frame, 885 F.2d 1119, 1134 (3d Cir.1989) (government has substantial interest in salvaging the beef industry), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bobby McGory
See also United States v. Holloway, 740 F.2d 1373, 1379 (6th Cir.) (holding that "errors in the exclusion of evidence may be cured by the admission of other evidence of substantially the same nature."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 (1984). 12 In Crane v. Sowders, 889 F.2d 715 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 (1990), we once again considered the exclusion of a defendant's proffered evidence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Geophysical Union v. Texaco Inc.
See, e.g., New Era Publications Int'l, ApS v. Henry Holt and Co. (“New Era”), 873 F.2d 576, 592 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1094 , 110 S.Ct. 1168 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1990) (Oakes, C.J, concurring) (“words that are facts calling for comment are distinguishable from words that simply enliven text.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Idaho Idaho Public Utilities Commission (Ipuc), Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenor v. Interstate Commerce Commission, State of Idaho v. Interstate Commerce Commission
See also Friends of Sierra R.R., Inc. v. I.C.C., 881 F.2d 663, 666 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 1166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. American General Group Insurance
Compare HealthAmerica v. Menton, 551 So.2d 235 (Ala.Sup.Ct.1989), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1166 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1990); Bricker v. Maytag Co., 450 N.W.2d 839 (Iowa Sup.Ct.1990); Castillo v. Neely’s TBA Dealer Supply, Inc., 776 S.W.2d 290 (Ct.App. 1st Dist.Tex.1989); and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Maryland v. Weiner, 543 So.2d 794 (Fla.Ct.App. 4th Dist.1989), with Amos v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama, 868 F.2d 430 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 158 , 107 L.Ed.2d 116 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Esto, Inc.
v.
Callahan, dba C. E. Callahan Co.
v.
Callahan, dba C. E. Callahan Co.
No. 89-1033.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1990.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.