green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. One 1985 Mercedes, and Kenneth Robert Glenn, Intervenor-Appellant
But see United States v. Tax Lot 1500, 861 F.2d 232 (9th Cir.1988) (finding the proportionality requirement of the Eighth Amendment inapplicable to an in rem civil forfeiture proceeding), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989). *421 In limited circumstances, individuals have the right to pursue discovery against the government to support claims of vindictive prosecution.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheridan Square Partnership v. United States
See Coleman v. Lyng, 864 F.2d 604, 611 (8th Cir.1988) ("Congress ... can change the statutory rights of litigants, even where this change may retroactively eliminate an initially meritorious claim, except where the new statute itself is for some reason unconstitutional."), cert. denied sub nom., 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989). 5 Recognizing the possibility that Sec. 801(a)(1) might preclude a direct attack upon HUD's actions, Sheridan Square alternatively attacks the statute itself on both procedural and substantive due process grounds.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheridan Square Partnership v. United States
See Coleman v. Lyng, 864 F.2d 604, 611 (8th Cir.1988) (“Congress ... can change the statutory rights of litigants, even where this change may retroactively eliminate an initially meritorious claim, except where the new statute itself is for some reason unconstitutional.”), cert. denied sub nom., 493 U.S. 953 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Real Property Located at 24124 Lemay Street
See United States v. 300 Cove Road, 861 F.2d 232, 235 (9th Cir.1988) cert. denied, 493 U.S. 954 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989) (proportionality requirement of Eighth Amendment inappropriate in in rem civil forfeiture proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Daniel Good
See Pub.L. 98-473, § 306 (a), 98 Stat. 2050 (Oct. 12, 1984) 2 Alternatively, Good asks us to adopt the reasoning of Judge Ferguson's concurring opinion in United States v. Tax Lot 1500, 861 F.2d 232, 236 (9th Cir.1988) (Ferguson, J., concurring), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 954 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Plat 20, Lot 17
See United States v. Tax Lot 1500, Etc., 861 F.2d 232, 236 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 954 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nos. 91-1681, 91-1682
See United States v. Tax Lot 1500, Etc., 861 F.2d 232, 236 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 954 , 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989) 12 To the extent that the appellants have voiced other assignments of error, none merit discussion.
cited
Cited "see"
Patrick F. McBride and Sonya S. McBride v. Steven H. Taylor and Dwight A. Sewall
See Coleman v. Lyng, 864 F.2d 604 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 88-6194
See United States v. Tax Lot 1500, 861 F.2d 232, 234-35 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989); United States v. Santoro, 866 F.2d 1538, 1543-44 (4th Cir.1989). 25 Although section 881(a)(7) does not place an express limit on the extent of real property that is forfeitable, other circuits reaching the issue have recognized that section 881(a)(7) by its explicit and broad terms allows for the forfeiture of entire parcels.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Real Property & Residence at 3097 S.W. 111th Avenue
See United States v. Tax Lot 1500, 861 F.2d 232, 234-35 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989); United States v. Santoro, 866 F.2d 1538, 1543-44 (4th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blankenship v. Bartlett
McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 , 425-26, 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 1104, 6 L.Ed.2d 393 , 399 (1961); see also Town of Beech Mountain v. County of Watauga, 324 N.C. 409 , 378 S.E.2d 780 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 954 , 110 S.Ct. 365 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989); Jones v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 141 N.C.App. 482 , 539 S.E.2d 380 (2000), appeal dismissed and disc. rev. denied, 353 N.C. 525 , 549 S.E.2d 858 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re a Parcel of Real Property Known as 1632 N. Santa Rita
See also United States v. Tax Lot 1500, 861 F.2d 232 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied by Jaffee v. United States, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1988), where the claimant grew 143 marijuana plants on a deck over his garage and in a two and one-half foot by five-foot garden.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Parcel of Real Property Known as 6109 Grubb Road, Etc. Appeal of Jane Diloreto
(2×)
See also United States v. Tax Lot 1500, 861 F.2d 232, 234-35 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 364 , 107 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989) (holding that Eighth Amendment protection does not extend to a forfeiture under Sec. 881(a)(7) due to the in rem nature of proceeding).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Town of Beech Mountain, North Carolina
v.
County of Watauga, North Carolina
v.
County of Watauga, North Carolina
No. 89-179.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1989.
Published
Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.