green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Valve Corp. v. Sierra Entertainment Inc.
See id. at 616 (citing Red Baron-Franklin Park, Inc. v. Taito Corp., 883 F.2d 275, 278-79 (4th Cir.1989)), cert denied, 493 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 869 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990) (video arcade owner’s use of copyrighted circuit boards in coin-operated video machines available to the public for a fee constituted public performance of the copyrighted work under 17 U.S.C. § 106 (4)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lord v. Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc.
(2×)
See Northwest Acceptance Corp. v. Lynnwood Equip., Inc., 841 F.2d 918 , 920 (9th Cir.1988). “[W]here the state’s highest court has not decided an issue, the task of the federal courts is to predict how the' state high court would resolve it.” Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Co., 880 F.2d 176, 186 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 868 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Images Audio Visual Productions, Inc. v. Perini Building Co.
See Red Baron— Franklin Park, Inc. v. Taito Corp., 883 F.2d 275, 279-81 (4th Cir.1989) (examining the "first sale” doctrine, which gives the purchaser of a copy of a copyrighted work the right to further distribute that copy), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 869 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia, Ltd., 880 F.2d 176 (9th Cir.1989), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 868 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Holbrook Unified School Dist. No. 3 of Navajo County v. California Ins. Co.
See Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Co., 880 F.2d 176, 186 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 868 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. City of Long Beach
(2×)
See Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Co., Ltd., 880 F.2d 176 , 190 n. 15 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 868 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990). 3 In the event there is a new trial, District Judge Letts has excused himself from the proceedings 4 The district court gave five reasons for granting a new trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. City of Long Beach
(2×)
See Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Co., Ltd., 880 F.2d 176 , 190 n. 15 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 868 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990). .
discussed
Cited "see"
State Farm Fire And Casualty Company v. Ronald Smith
(2×)
See Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Co., 880 F.2d 176, 186 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 868 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Smith
(2×)
See Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Co., 880 F.2d 176, 186 (9th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 868 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maureen McNamara Christopher Taylor Mariah Lynn Taylor, Individually and on Behalf of the General Public v. F 48, a Limited Partnership United Pacific Land, a California Corporation, Bobbie Casey Jim Casey, Dba Le Chateau Apartments
(2×)
We disagree. 7 As to the former, it simply cannot be said that "the evidence, construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, permits only one reasonable conclusion, and that conclusion is contrary to the jury's." Vollrath Co. v. Sammi Corp., 9 F.3d 1455, 1460 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994); see also Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v Air Asia Co., Ltd., 880 F.2d 176, 181 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 868 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connors, Fiscina, Swartz & Zimmerly v. Rees
(2×)
See Tuxedo Contractors, Inc. v. Swindell-Dressler Co., 198 U.S.App.D.C. 426, 429 , 613 F.2d 1159, 1162 (1979); see also Technology for Energy Corp. v. Scandpower, A/S, 880 F.2d 875, 877 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1057 , 110 S.Ct. 868 , 107 L.Ed.2d 952 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spangler v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
(2×)
This court’s language falls short of the type of personal invective that sometimes characterizes “[fjriction between court and counsel [but still] does not constitute bias.” F.T.C. v. Amy Travel Service, Inc., 875 F.2d 564, 576 n. 13 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 366 , 107 L.Ed.2d 352 (1989); see, e.g., Air-Sea Travelers, Inc. v. Air Asia Co., 880 F.2d 176, 191 (9th Cir.1989) (recusal not necessary where the district court “observed that counsel ... had ‘misled’ the jury by blowing ‘cloak and dagger smoke’ at it”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Technology for Energy Corp.
v.
RADCAL Engineering, Inc.
v.
RADCAL Engineering, Inc.
No. 89-883.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1990.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.