green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. Landmark Graphics Corp.
See McClendon v. Ingersoll-Rand Co., 779 S.W.2d 69 (Tex.1989), ce rt. denied, 494 U.S. 1078 , 110 S.Ct. 1804 , 108 L.Ed.2d 935 (1990); Sabine Pilot Serv., Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733 (Tex.1985); see also Winters v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 795 S.W.2d 723 , 724 n. 1 (Tex.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winters v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.
See abo McClendon v. Ingersoll-Rand Co., 779 S.W.2d 69 (Tex.1989), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1804 , 108 L.Ed.2d 935 (1990) (recognizing exception for dismissal motivated by the employer’s desire to avoid paying pension benefits). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ingersoll-Rand Co.
v.
McClendon
v.
McClendon
No. 89-1298.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 1990.
Published
Sup. Ct. Tex. Motions of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Paper Institute, Inc., and Equal Employment Advisory Council for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted.