green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
12.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case ·
…it is an interest carved out of the lessee's share of the , ordinarily called the working interest, as distinguished from the owner's reserved royalty interest.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case ·
…it is an interest carved out of the lessee's share of the oil and gas, ordinarily called the working interest, as distinguished from the owner's reserved royalty interest.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
David J. Pierce Trust v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
(2×)
it is an interest carved out of the lessee's share of the , ordinarily called the working interest, as distinguished from the owner's reserved royalty interest.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.
(2×)
it is an interest carved out of the lessee's share of the oil and gas, ordinarily called the working interest, as distinguished from the owner's reserved royalty interest.
discussed
Cited "see"
Black Butte Coal Co. v. United States
(2×)
See Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Co., 308 F.2d 875, 882-83 (10th Cir.1962), rev’d on other grounds, 375 U.S. 160 , 84 S.Ct. 273 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 (1963); Portwood v. Buckalew, 521 S.W.2d 904, 912 (Tex.Civ.App.1975).
examined
Cited "see"
Therese A. Farber v. Massillon Board of Education
(3×)
See Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Corp., 375 U.S. 160 [ 84 S.Ct. 273 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 ] (1963).” Id. at -, 110 S.Ct. at 1337 .
examined
Cited "see"
Therese A. Farber v. Massillon Board of Education
(3×)
See Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Corp., 375 U.S. 160 [ 84 S.Ct. 273 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 ] (1963).” Id. at-, 110 S.Ct. at 1337 .
examined
Cited "see"
Sunac Petroleum Corporation v. Parkes
(4×)
See Meeker v. Ambassador Oil Co., 308 F.2d 875 (10th Cir. 1962), rev'd on other grounds, 375 U.S. 160 , 84 S.Ct. 273 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 (1963); K. & E.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melendez-Carrion
See, e.g., United States v. Egorov, 319 F.2d 817 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (bail for espionage offense denied as a matter of discretion), cert. dismissed, 375 U.S. 926 , 84 S.Ct. 329 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 (1963); Fed.R.Crim.P. 46(a)(1) (1946).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Yvonne Melendez-Carrion
See, e.g., United States v. Egorov, 319 F.2d 817 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (bail for espionage offense denied as a matter of discretion), cert. dismissed, 375 U.S. 926 , 84 S.Ct. 329 , 11 L.Ed.2d 261 (1963); Fed.R.Crim.P. 46(a)(1) (1946). 41 The historical question is whether the discretionary authority of judges to deny bail in capital cases could be exercised because of the dangerousness of the defendant or only because of a risk of flight, a risk surely increased by the prospect of the death penalty.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MEEKER ET UX.
v.
AMBASSADOR OIL CORP.
v.
AMBASSADOR OIL CORP.
46.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1963.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
O. R. Adams, Jr. argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was R. F. Deacon Arledge.
C. Harold Thweatt argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Vivian Diffendaffer.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed. Beacon Theatres, Inc., v. Westover, 359 U. S. 500; Dairy Queen, Inc., v. Wood, 369 U. S. 469.