green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Barnes
See Southtrust Bank of Alabama v. Thomas (In re Thomas), 883 F.2d 991 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1007 , 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990); Sun Finance Co., Inc. v. Howard (In re Howard), 972 F.2d 639 (5th Cir.1992); Piedmont Trust Bank v. Linkous (In re Linkous), 990 F.2d 160 (4th Cir.1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Holloway v. Southeast Alabama Medical Center & Golden Peanut Co. (In Re Holloway)
See, e.g., Southtrust Bank of Alabama, N.A. v. Thomas (In re Thomas), 883 F.2d 991, 996 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1007 , 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. Daniels (In Re Daniels)
See also In re Thomas, 883 F.2d 991 , 996 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, Thomas v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, 497 U.S. 1007 , 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Bisch v. United States (In Re Bisch)
(4×)
See also In re Thomas, 883 F.2d 991, 998 (11th Cir.1989), cert, denied, 497 U.S. 1007 , 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990) (confirmation of plan cannot extinguish lien for which no proof of claim is filed); In re Work, 58 B.R. 868, 873 (Bankr.D.Or.1986) (holding that a real property tax lien was not extinguished by the county’s failure to file a proof of claim or by confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan which treated the claim as unsecured).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Club Associates v. Consolidated Capital Realty Investors (In re Club Associates)
In re Sublett, 895 F.2d at 1383; In re Goerg, 930 F.2d 1563 , 1566 (Bankr. 11th Cir.1991); see Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7052, 8013; see also In re Thomas, 883 F.2d 991 , 994 (Bankr. 11th Cir.1989) (“The standard of review to be utilized by the court of appeals is the same as that to be utilized by the district court — ‘factual findings of the bankruptcy court cannot be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous.’ ” (quoting In re Downtown Properties, Ltd., 794 F.2d 647, 651 (Bankr. 11th Cir.1986))), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Club Associates
In re Sublett, 895 F.2d at 1383; In re Goerg, 930 F.2d 1563 , 1566 (11th Cir.1991); see Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7052, 8013; see also In re Thomas, 883 F.2d 991 , 994 (11th Cir.1989) ("The standard of review to be utilized by the court of appeals is the same as that to be utilized by the district court--'factual findings of the bankruptcy court cannot be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous.' " (quoting In re Downtown Properties, Ltd., 794 F.2d 647, 651 (11th Cir.1986))), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 3245 , 111 L.Ed.2d 756 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James THOMAS, et ux.
v.
SOUTHTRUST BANK OF ALABAMA, etc.
v.
SOUTHTRUST BANK OF ALABAMA, etc.
No. 89-7358.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1990.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Denied.