green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…erisa permits suits to recover benefits only against the plan as an entity
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hemphill v. Unisys Corp.
(2×)
erisa permits suits to recover benefits only against the plan as an entity
discussed
Cited "see"
Witowski v. Tetra Tech, Inc.
(2×)
See Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan, 914 F.2d 1279, 1287 (9th Cir.1990) (quoting Gelardi) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1087 , 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991) and Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 266 (6th Cir.1988) (permitting benefits recovery action against the party controlling administration of the plan), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 826 , 109 S.Ct. 76 , 102 L.Ed.2d 52 (1988). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Arizona State Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Citibank
(2×)
See Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees, 914 F.2d 1279, 1283-84 (9th Cir.1990) named fiduciary’s delegee became fiduciary when, as expressly authorized in Plan, Board of Directors designated “responsibility for carrying out all phases of the Administration of the Plan”, cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1087 , 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991); Gelardi v. Pertec Computer Corp., 761 F.2d 1323, 1325 (9th Cir.1985) (once employer appointed plan administrator and gave it control over benefit plan, employer was no longer fiduciary).
discussed
Cited "see"
21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1657, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7191, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,688, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23937g Arizona State Carpenters Pension Trust Fund, a Trust James R. McDonald Jr. And Mark Minter v. Citibank, (Arizona), an Arizona Banking Corporation
(2×)
See Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees, 914 F.2d 1279, 1283-84 (9th Cir.1990) named fiduciary's delegee became fiduciary when, as expressly authorized in Plan, Board of Directors designated "responsibility for carrying out all phases of the Administration of the Plan", cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1087 , 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991); Gelardi v. Pertec Computer Corp., 761 F.2d 1323, 1325 (9th Cir.1985) (once employer appointed plan administrator and gave it control over benefit plan, employer was no longer fiduciary). 34 The Agreements do not purport to delegate…
discussed
Cited "see"
Arizona State Carpenters Pension Trust Fund v. Citibank (Arizona), an Arizona Banking Corporation
(2×)
See Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability *1316 Plan for Salaried Employees, 914 F.2d 1279, 1283-84 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1087 , 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991) (named fiduciary’s delegee became fiduciary when, as expressly authorized in Plan, Board of Directors designated “responsibility for carrying out all phases of the Administration of the Plan”); Gelardi v. Pertec Computer Corp., 761 F.2d 1323, 1325 (9th Cir.1985) (once employer appointed plan administrator and gave it control over benefit plan, employer was no longer fiduciary).
discussed
Cited "see"
John P. McKenzie v. General Telephone Company of California, Dba Gtel
(2×)
See Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan, 914 F.2d 1279, 1283-84 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1087 , 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary Kirwan v. Marriott Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
(2×)
See Cathey v. Dow Chemical Co. Medical Care Program, 907 F.2d 554, 558-59 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1087 , 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991). 30 .
examined
Cited "see"
Howard E. Cox v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, Mid-America Dairymen, Inc. Retirement Plan Northern Trust Company
(4×)
See Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan, 914 F.2d 1279, 1286 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. American International Life Assurance Co.
(2×)
See Cathey v. Dow Chemical Co. Medical Care Program, 907 F.2d 554, 558 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991) (must be express grant of discretionary authority).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guthrie v. Hewlett-Packard Co. Employee Benefits Organization
(2×)
See Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan, 914 F.2d 1279, 1286 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991); Graham v. Federal Express Corp., 725 F.Supp. 429, 436 (W.D.Ark.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Podolan v. Aetna Life Insurance
(2×)
See also Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan, 914 F.2d 1279, 1283-84 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1087 , 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel R. Nesom v. Brown and Root, U.S.A., Inc., Unum Life Insurance Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees, 914 F.2d 1279, 1287 (9th Cir.1990) (upholding plan’s recovery of retroactive social security award under general plan provision for reduction of benefits by any social security benefits, even though plan contained no specific provision for retroactive reimbursement), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991); Stuart v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nesom v. Brown and Root, U.S.A., Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees, 914 F.2d 1279, 1287 (9th Cir.1990) (upholding plan's recovery of retroactive social security award under general plan provision for reduction of benefits by any social security benefits, even though plan contained no specific provision for retroactive reimbursement), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 8 See paragraph 10 of the order, quoted above in note 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boland v. King County Medical Blue Shield
(2×)
See also Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees, 914 F.2d 1279, 1284-85 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Florence B. Corcoran Wife Of/and Wayne D. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc., and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Cathey v. Dow Chemical Co. Medical Care Program, 907 F.2d 554, 555 (5th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernita Hammond v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company, a Maryland Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Madden v. ITT Long Term Disability Plan, 914 F.2d 1279 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 964 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1051 (1991) (employee suffering from spinal injury was not totally disabled where he was able to perform semi-sedentary work different from his regular occupation).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
FLORENCE B. CORCORAN Wife of/and WAYNE D. CORCORAN v. UNITED HEALTHCARE, INC., and BLUE CROSS and BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMA, INC
See, e.g., Cathey v. Dow Chemical Co. Medical Care Program, 907 F.2d 554, 555 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 964 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cathey et ux.
v.
Dow Chemical Company Medical Care Program
v.
Dow Chemical Company Medical Care Program
No. 90-960.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1991.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.