green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Cary v. Cox
the government need not produce direct proof of scienter in a fraud case, however; circumstantial evidence of criminal intent can suffice
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walters
See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489 , 1493 n. 1 (11th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. Johnson
See United States v. Gallardo, 915 F.2d 149, 151 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991) (mailing four separate envelopes containing child pornography constitutes four separate offenses).
cited
Cited "see"
Brodersen v. Sioux Valley Memorial Hospital
See [United States v.] Hawkins, 905 F.2d [1489,] 1494 [(11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991) ].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Allan Ross
(2×)
See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489, 1493 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francisco Fernando Reyes, Fernando F. Reyes, Berta Lucia Osario De Reyes and Rafael Reyes, Jeffrey Stein
See United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489, 1495 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilliam v. State
See Proctor v. United States, 729 F.Supp. 473, 476 (D.Md.) (rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim where presentation of evidence defendant claimed was “vital” would have merely been cumulative), aff'd sub nom. 911 F.2d 721 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 697 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Labean
See also United States v. Gallardo, 915 F.2d 149 (5th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991) (affirming sentence of consecutive six-year terms of imprisonment per violation for simultaneously placing three letters in the mail that contained pornographic photographs, constituting three separate violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a)(1)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Labean
See also United States v. Gallardo, 915 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 (1991) (affirming sentence of consecutive six-year terms of imprisonment per violation for simultaneously placing three letters in the mail that contained pornographic photographs, constituting three separate violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a)(1)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oken v. State
(2×)
Gilliam II, 331 Md. at 678-80 , 629 A.2d at 699-700 (rejecting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel where evidence not presented was cumulative); see also Proctor v. United States, 729 F.Supp. 473, 476 (D.Md.) (rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim where evidence would have been merely cumulative, notwithstanding defendant's claim that evidence was `vital'), aff'd sub. nom., Epps v. United States, 911 F.2d 721 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 697 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knotts v. State
See also United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 707 , 112 L.Ed.2d 696 (1991) (error harmless unless reasonable likelihood that it affected defendant's substantial rights).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duckworth v. State
(2×)
Compare United States v. Griffin , 909 F.2d 1222 (8th Cir. 1990) (facts reported to stopping officer by another officer are just as good as if observed first hand by stopping officer), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1038 , 111 S.Ct. 708 , 112 L.Ed.2d 697 (1991). "[C]onduct which might be deemed innocuous in the daytime might be viewed otherwise at night." 3 W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen D. Johnson v. John Deere Company, a Division of Deere & Company, a Corporation, and Third Party v. William Ivan Johnson, Third Party
Johnson’s main problem with the phrase appears to be with “substantial;” however, this word is found throughout the law and is clearly within the understanding of the ordinary person. 511 Detroit St, Inc. v. Kelley, 807 F.2d 1293 , 1296 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 928 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987); see also United States v. Clark, 912 F.2d 1087, 1090 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that “substantial portion” was not unconstitutionally vague because the words were “of sufficient clarity and common usage”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 705 , 112 L.Ed.2d 695 (19…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gray
v.
Board of County Commissioners for the County of El Paso, Colorado
v.
Board of County Commissioners for the County of El Paso, Colorado
No. 90-6308.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.