green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.6 score
“the plaintiff's proof of damages is facilitated by the rule that once the plaintiff has met its burden of proving the fact of damage, some uncertainty with respect to the amount of damages will not preclude recovery”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Milicia
the plaintiff's proof of damages is facilitated by the rule that once the plaintiff has met its burden of proving the fact of damage, some uncertainty with respect to the amount of damages will not preclude recovery
cited
Cited "see"
Westman v. Andersohn (In Re Westman)
See Hufford v. *348 Rodgers, 912 F.2d 1338, 1341 (11th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1312 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bellovin v. United States
See. e.g., McCray v. United States, 910 F.2d 1289, 1290 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom., Scott v. United States, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1313 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991); Wright v. United States, 79 A.F.T.R.2d 97 -623, 1995 WL 838984 , *16 (E.D.N.Y.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mobayed v. Mobayed
See, Garmon v. Alabama State Bar, 570 So.2d 633, 634 (Ala. 1990) cert. denied 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1312 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991) (noting that “the respondent has presented no evidence tending to show that the requirements of Rule 53(b) are generally not observed in domestic relations cases in Etowah County or that ‘routine’ domestic relations cases are automatically assigned to Higgins without court orders,”); and Tallant v. Tallant, 564 So.2d 971, 972-73 (Ala.1990) (noting that “[w]e find no evidence in the record to support the appellant’s contention that Rule 53, Alabama Rul…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bob Klein v. Arkoma Production Company
See International Union, UAW v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 917 F.2d 107, 110-11 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1313 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991). 51 Nor are we now correct, and in truth we compound our error, when we take what was an unwarranted appellate court fact-finding, call it a "conclusion of law," and then use it as "the law of the case" to reverse carefully considered detailed findings of fact made by the district judge after hearing all of the evidence in a five-day trial.
cited
Cited "see"
Bob Klein v. Arkoma Production
See International Union, UAW v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 917 F.2d 107, 110-11 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1313 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Baby Neal v. Casey
See International Union, United Auto, etc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 820 F.2d 91, 95 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1313 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Neal Ex Rel. Kanter v. Casey
See International Union, United Auto, etc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 820 F.2d 91, 95 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1313 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Avino
See Hufford v. Rodgers, 912 F.2d 1338, 1341-42 (11th Cir.1990) (county sheriff not state agent entitled to immunity), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1312 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Coca-Cola Bottling Company Of Shreveport, Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Company
See Int'l Union, UAW v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 917 F.2d 107, 110 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1313 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.
See Int’l Union, UAW v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 917 F.2d 107, 110 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1313 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pelican Marine Carriers, Inc. v. City of Tampa
See generally Hufford v. Rodgers, 912 F.2d 1338, 1341 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1312 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991) (state sovereign immunity serves only to insulate the state from lawsuits in its own court and has no application to claims brought under Section 1983 in federal court); Hill v. Dept. of Corrections, 513 So.2d 129, 131 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1064 , 108 S.Ct. 1024 , 98 L.Ed.2d 989 (1988) (recognizing that the Eleventh Amendment protects state governments from suits in federal court while sovereign immunity protects state governments from suits in s…
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Alabama State Bar
See Garmon v. Alabama State Bar, 570 So.2d 633 (Ala.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1312 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sumpter
See also Hufford v. Rodgers, 912 F.2d 1338, 1341 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1312 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Caparco v. United States
See, e.g., McCray v. United States, 910 F.2d 1289, 1290 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1313 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991); Kelly v. Lethert, 362 F.2d 629, 635 (8th Cir.1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Serv-A-Portion, Inc.
v.
J. F. Feeser Inc.
v.
J. F. Feeser Inc.
No. 90-1158.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.