green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
12.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…even if we agreed with the defendant, we could not overrule the decision of an earlier panel
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mendez v. Gearan
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
has been construed to provide a private right of action under section 504.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gary Gilliam
(2×)
even if we agreed with the defendant, we could not overrule the decision of an earlier panel
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. McMurray
United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1199 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 *371 (1991); United States v. Brewer, 853 F.2d 1319, 1322 (6th Cir.1988) (on reh'g) (analyzing antecedent statute to the ACCA), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 946 , 109 S.Ct. 375 , 102 L.Ed.2d 364 (1988), 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guy Zappulla v. People of the State of New York
See People v. Zappulla, 282 A.D.2d at 697-98 , 724 N.Y.S.2d at 435-36 . 19 Federal courts considering petitions for writs of habeas corpus are not "bound by a state appellate court's ruling in petitioner's favor on a matter of constitutional law." Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1093 (2d Cir.1990) (affirming district court denial of habeas on the basis of evidence ordered suppressed by the state appellate court), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alberti v. City & County of San Francisco Sheriff's Department
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1990) (holding a plaintiff need not exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act).
cited
Cited "see"
Flores v. Demskie
See Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1094 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Madden-Tyler v. Maricopa County
(2×)
Accord Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Velez v. People of the State of New York
It is predicated on principles of judicial comity, and is “designed to protect the state courts’ role in the enforcement of federal law and prevent disruption of state judicial proceedings.” Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 518 , 102 S.Ct. 1198, 1203 , 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982); see Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1094 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Remington Rand Corp. v. Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank, N.V.
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 330 , 99 S.Ct. 645, 651 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); accord Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1096 (2d Cir.1990) (“lack of incentive to litigate vigorously may render the collateral estoppel doctrine inoperative”), cer t. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); United States v. Berman, 884 F.2d 916, 924 (6th Cir.1989) (“Unfairness can result when the party to be bound lacked an incentive to litigate in the first trial.”) (internal quotation marks omitted); Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28 (1982) (issue preclusion m…
discussed
Cited "see"
Remington Rand Corporation v. Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank, N.V.
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 330 , 99 S.Ct. 645, 651 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); accord Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1096 (2d Cir.1990) ("lack of incentive to litigate vigorously may render the collateral estoppel doctrine inoperative"), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); United States v. Berman, 884 F.2d 916, 924 (6th Cir.1989) ("Unfairness can result when the party to be bound lacked an incentive to litigate in the first trial.") (internal quotation marks omitted); Restatement (Second) of Judgments Sec. 28 (1982) (issue preclusion may not …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roger D. Maples
(2×)
See United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1196-97 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 ; United States v. Glover, 846 F.2d 339, 342 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 533 , 102 L.Ed.2d 565 ; United States v. Mavrokordatos, 933 F.2d 843, 847-48 (10th Cir.1991); United States v. Euceda-Hernandez, 768 F.2d 1307, 1312 (11th Cir.1985). 14 In United States v. Bartle, 835 F.2d 646 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 969 , 108 S.Ct. 1245 , 99 L.Ed.2d 443 (1988), the Sixth Circuit addressed the scope of a district court's discretion in imposing …
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin D. Collings v. Longview Fibre Company, Richard James Beamer James C. Banes James Miller Michael Shay Guy Yeager Billy R. Staggs Barry J. Reeves v. Longview Fibre Company
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1340 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (once employer offers legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for discharge, burden shifts to employees to demonstrate that articulated reason is pretext for handicap discrimination); Steckl v. Motorola, Inc., 703 F.2d 392, 393 (9th Cir.1983). 26 In Steckl, the court held that summary judgment for an employer was appropriate on an employee's claim that he was not promoted because of his age.
discussed
Cited "see"
Collings v. Longview Fibre Co.
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1340 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (once employer offers legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for discharge, burden shifts to employees to demonstrate that articulated reason is pretext for handicap discrimination); Steckl v. Motorola, Inc., 703 F.2d 392, 393 (9th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Bates v. United States
See Wilson v. United States, 917 F.2d 529, 532 (Fed.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (citing 10 U.S.C. §§ 1331 , 1333, 1401 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Veal v. Memorial Hospital of Washington County
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1335 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (“there is no indication that Congress intended to foreclose section 1983 claims that are unrelated to handicap discrimination’’); see also Alexander, 773 F.2d at 855-56 (Title VI only precludes actions under § 1983 that are “based on” those titles; “only if the right asserted was created by Title VII must it be vindicated through the procedural system set up in that Act”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyler v. City of Manhattan
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1336 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); Doe v. Region 13 Mental Health-Mental Retardation Comm., 704 F.2d 1402 , 1407 n. 3 (5th Cir.), reh’g en banc denied, 709 F.2d 712 (5th Cir.1983); Rivera Flores v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co., 776 F.Supp. 61, 71 (D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ethridge v. State of Ala.
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); Pushkin v. Regents of the University of Colorado, 658 F.2d 1372 (10th Cir.1981); Ali v. City of Clearwater, 807 F.Supp. 701 (M.D.Fla.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Groves v. United States
See Wilson v. United States, 917 F.2d 529, 533 (Fed.Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (Congressional policy clearly was that if reserve commissioned officers were to be passed over for promotion and retention, at least they could, after enough years, be guaranteed their retirement.).
cited
Cited "see"
Noland v. Wheatley
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); Greater Los Angeles Council on Deafness, Inc. v. Community Television of So.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold M. Newcomb
See United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1198 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Roscoe McGlocklin
(2×)
See United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1195 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Petersen v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); 42 U.S.C. §§ 12117 and 12133 (outlining enforcement provisions of Title I and Title II respectively).
cited
Cited "see"
Doe Ex Rel. Lavery v. Attorney General of the United States
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1339-1340 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
John W. Madsen v. Boise State University
(2×)
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (noting but not deciding the question).
cited
Cited "see"
Boothe v. McLellan
See Pinkney v. Keane, 737 F.Supp. 187, 198 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 920 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1990), cert denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cook v. Rhode Island, Department of Mental Health, Retardation & Hospitals
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); Doe v. Garrett, 903 F.2d 1455, 1460 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1102 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cook v. Rhode Island, Department of Mental Health, Retardation & Hospitals
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, - U.S. 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); Doe v. Garrett, 903 F.2d 1455, 1460 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1102 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Skinner
See Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1336-38 (9th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Township of Dover v. Scuorzo
See also Wilson v. United States, 917 F. 2d 529 (Fed.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed. 2d 995 (1991) (holding that the phrase "on active duty" in 10 U.S.C.A. § 1163 (d), which protects certain members of the Reserves from involuntary release prior to qualifying for retirement, does not include "active duty for training").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Saunders
See also In re Ivy, 1988 WL 409629 (D.Or.1988), aff'd 920 F.2d 936 (9th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied 501 U.S. 1217, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crespo v. New York City Police Commissioner
Under New York law, “a party has not had a full and fair opportunity to litigate an issue if it has had no opportunity to appeal the adverse finding.” Fletcher, 68 F.3d at 1458 (citing People v. Medina, 208 A.D.2d 771, 772 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 491, 493 (2d Dep’t 1994), appeal denied, 84 N.Y.2d 1035 , 623 N.Y.S.2d 191 , 647 N.E.2d 463 (1995)); see also Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1096 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (collateral es-toppel does not apply when appellate review is unobtainable as a matter of law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Daryl H. Bunkley v. Larry R. Meachum, Commissioner of Correction, State of Connecticut
See also Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1095 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,358 Marianne E. Fletcher, Nancy L. Bartley, Raphael Paganelli, and Charlotte Evans v. Atex, Inc., Eastman Kodak Company, and Jenny L. Hermanson and Christy Scattarella v. 805 Middlesex Corp., F/k/a Atex, Inc., and Apple Computers, Inc., Eastman Kodak Company
People v. Medina, 208 A.D.2d 771 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 491, 493 (2d Dep't 1994); see also Pinkney v. Keane, 737 F.Supp. 187, 195 (E.D.N.Y.) ("Under New York law, a party who has obtained a final judgment in its favor is not normally precluded from relitigating a subsidiary issue that was decided against it."), aff'd, 920 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.
People v. Medina, 208 A.D.2d 771 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 491, 493 (2d Dep’t 1994); see also Pinkney v. Keane, 737 F.Supp. 187, 195 (E.D.N.Y.) (“Under New York law, a party who has obtained a final judgment in its favor is not normally precluded from relitigating a subsidiary issue that was decided against it.”), aff'd, 920 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. County of Milwaukee
Thus, the courts that have ruled on the issue have found that because Title II takes its procedures from the Rehabilitation Act, it does not contain an exhaustion requirement, and Title II eases can be filed without having filed with a federal agency first. 10 Petersen v. University of Wis. Bd. of Regents, 818 F.Supp. 1276 (W.D.Wis.1993); Noland v. Wheatley, 835 F.Supp. 476, 483 (N.D.Ind. 1993); Finley v. Giacobbe, 827 F.Supp. 215 , 219 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1993); see also Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1338 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); 42 U.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terri L. NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General; U.S. Postal Service, Defendants-Appellants
(2×)
See, e.g., Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1337 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that compensatory money damages are generally "distinct" from equitable forms of relief, such as injunctions or back pay), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991). 78 In sum, Nichols may recover payments for discriminatory harm to the full extent allowed by Title VII.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Aikins v. St. Helena Hospital
See, e.g., Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1337-38 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hebert Ex Rel. Hebert v. Manchester, New Hampshire, School District
See, e.g., Smith v. Barton, 914 F.2d 1330, 1333 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2825 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); Thorne v. Cavazos, 744 F.Supp. 348, 351 (D.D.C.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robin Rene Warner (90-3753) Michelle Lynn Angel (90-3754) Joyce Ann Richmond (90-3767) Juniata Marla Redd (90-3755)
This court has repeatedly held that a person is not entitled to be notified of her Miranda rights before an interrogation if that person is not “in custody.” 2 See, e.g., United States v. Peete, 919 F.2d 1168, 1176 (6th Cir.1990) (Miranda “only applies to situations involving custodial interrogations”); United States v. Macklin, 900 F.2d 948, 950-951 (6th Cir.1990) (“A person is entitled to receive Miranda warnings only if questioned while in custody.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 116 , 112 L.Ed.2d 86 (1990); United States v. Knox, 839 F.2d 285, 291-292 (6th Cir.1988) (“…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stephen IVY, et ux.
v.
Robert W. MYERS
v.
Robert W. MYERS
No. 90-1445.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1991.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2) · N.D. California (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Denied.