green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hinsdale v. City of Liberal,KS
See Griffin v. Davies, 929 F.2d 550, 554 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 878 , 112 S.Ct. 223 , 116 L.Ed.2d 180 (1991) (‘We will not undertake to decide issues that do not affect the outcome of a dispute.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frazier v. Simmons
See Griffin v. Davies, 929 F.2d 550, 554 (10th Cir.) ("We will not undertake to decide issues that do not affect the outcome of a dispute.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 878 , 112 S.Ct. 223 , 116 L.Ed.2d 180 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Med Safe Northwest, Inc. v. Medvial, Inc.
See Griffin v. Davies, 929 F.2d 550, 554 (10th Cir.) (“We will not undertake to decide issues that do not affect the outcome of a dispute.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 878 , 112 S.Ct. 223 , 116 L.Ed.2d 180 ; Snell v. Tunnell, 920 F.2d 673, 676 (10th Cir.1990) (citing case law supporting the court’s refusal to decide an issue “when the party adversely affected had not appealed the adverse order”), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 976 , 111 S.Ct. 1622 , 113 L.Ed.2d 719 (1991). 14 E.
cited
Cited "see"
Pandolfi De Rinaldis v. Llavona
See Pittsley v. Warish, 927 F.2d 3, 6 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 , 112 S.Ct. 226 , 116 L.Ed.2d 183 (1991); see also Coyne v. City of Somerville, 770 F.Supp. at 746, n. 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Amanatullah v. Colorado Board of Medical Examiners
See Griffin v. Davies, 929 F.2d 550, 554 (10th Cir.) (we will not “undertake to decide issues that do not affect the outcome of a dispute”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 878 , 112 S.Ct. 223 , 116 L.Ed.2d 180 (1991). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Ellis
See Pittsley v. Warish, 927 F.2d 3, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 (1991) (where defendant challenges the state’s conduct as inadequate, rather than the adequacy of the procedure, due process claims examined under rubric of substantive due process).
discussed
Cited "see"
Towerridge, Inc., Sued as United States of America for the Benefit of Towerridge, Inc., and v. T.A.O., Inc., and Mid-Continent Casualty Co., And
See Griffin v. Davies, 929 F.2d 550, 554 (10th Cir.) (appellate court will not “undertake to decide issues that do not affect the outcome of a dispute”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 878 , 112 S.Ct. 223 , 116 L.Ed.2d 180 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Feldman
See United States v. Smith, 930 F.2d 1450, 1455 (10th Cir.) (holding that advanced age, without more, does not render a victim unusually vulnerable), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 , 112 S.Ct. 225 , 116 L.Ed.2d 182 (1991); see also United States v. Rowe, 999 F.2d 14, 17 (1st Cir.1993) (cautioning that courts cannot predicate a finding of unusual vulnerability on generalizations about large classes to which the victim belongs).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Feldman
See United States v. ___ ______________ Smith, 930 F.2d 1450, 1455 (10th Cir.) (holding that advanced _____ age, without more, does not render a victim unusually vulnerable), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 (1991); see also United _____ ______ ___ ____ ______ States v. Rowe, 999 F.2d 14, 17 (1st Cir. 1993) (cautioning that ______ ____ courts cannot predicate a finding of unusual vulnerability on generalizations about large classes to which the victim belongs).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vaaiga Ina Clark, and Johnny Clark
See United States v. Commito, 918 F.2d 95, 97-98 (9th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ekwunoh
See United States v. Smith, 930 F.2d 1450, 1456 (10th Cir.) (“‘fully de novo resentencing is entirely appropriate” after vacation and remand), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 , 112 S.Ct. 225 , 116 L.Ed.2d 182 (1991); United States v. Ekhator, 853 F.Supp. 630, 634 (E.D.N.Y.1994) (de novo sentence appropriate on remand, given absence of “any authority to the contrary”).
discussed
Cited "see"
G. Kevin Jones v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior
See Griffin v. Davies, 929 F.2d 550, 554 (10th Cir.) (refusing to decide issues not affecting outcome of appeal), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 878 , 112 S.Ct. 223 , 116 L.Ed.2d 180 (1991). 6 The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Utah is AF *283 FIRMED.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard T. Marchese, Laura Lee Sorenson, Orville Leroy Sandberg, David R. Nemelka
See United States v. Dunning, 929 F.2d 579, 581 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 , 112 S.Ct. 224 , 116 L.Ed.2d 182 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Merriweather v. Reynolds
See also Pittsley v. Warish, 927 F.2d 3, 7 (1st Cir. 1991) (“Fear or emotional injury which results solely from verbal harassment or idle threats is generally not sufficient to constitute an invasion of an identified liberty interest.”), cert. denied, Pittsley by Pittsley v. Warish, 502 U.S. 879 , 112 S.Ct. 226 , 116 L.Ed.2d 183 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Kelly v. City of Fountain Inn
See, e.g., Pittslev v. Warish, 927 F.2d 3 , 9 n.4 (1st Cir.) ("In order to have a valid § 1983 claim against a municipality, a state actor must first commit an underlying constitutional violation."), cert, denied, 502 U.S. 879 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aversa v. United States
See also Pittsley v. Warish, 927 F.2d 3, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 , 112 S.Ct. 226 , 116 L.Ed.2d 183 (1991). 14 We have said that substantive due process is violated if either (1) the government actor deprived the plaintiff of an identified interest in life, liberty or property protected by the Fifth Amendment, or (2) the government actor’s conduct “shocks the conscience.” See Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Prods., Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 531 (1st Cir.1995) (citations omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aversa v. United States
See also Pittsley v. ___________ ___ ____ ___________ Warish, 927 F.2d 3, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 ______ ____ ______ (1991).14 We have said that substantive due process is violated if either (1) the government actor deprived the plaintiff of an identified interest in life, liberty or property protected by the Fifth Amendment, or (2) the government actor's conduct "shocks the conscience." See ___ Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Prods., Inc., 68 F.3d 525 , 531 __________________________________________ (1st Cir. 1995) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. ____ ______ 1044 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. State
See, e.g., Carter v. State, 576 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 1989) (affirming death sentence where *332 the trial court found three aggravating circumstances of committed while under a sentence of imprisonment, committed during a robbery, and prior violent felony conviction, and one nonstatutory mitigating circumstance of a deprived childhood), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 , 112 S.Ct. 225 , 116 L.Ed.2d 182 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silva v. University of New Hampshire
See also Pittsley v. Warish, 927 F.2d 3, 6 (1st Cir.) (substantive due process “imposes limits on what a state may do regardless of what procedural protection is provided”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 , 112 S.Ct. 226 , 116 L.Ed.2d 183 (1991). [SJubstantive due process protects individuals against state actions which are “arbitrary and capricious,” Newman [v. Commonwealth of Mass.], 884 F.2d [19,] 25 [ (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1078 , 110 S.Ct. 1132 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1990) ], or those which run counter to “the concept of ordered liberty,” Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Taylor
v.
Hesse, Superintendent, Arrowhead Correctional Center
v.
Hesse, Superintendent, Arrowhead Correctional Center
No. 91-5168.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.