Pullock v. United States, 502 U.S. 895 (1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Pullock v. United States, 502 U.S. 895 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mark James Asay v. State of Florida (fla, 2017-08-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
examined Cited "see" Mark James Asay v. State of Florida (4×)
Fla. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Asay v. State (Asay I), 580 So. 2d 610 , 610- 12 (Fla.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 895 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" James Ernest Hitchcock v. State of Florida (2×)
Fla. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Asay v. Florida, 502 U.S. 895 , 112 S.Ct. 265 , 116 L.Ed.2d 218 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. (2×)
Fla. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Asay v. Florida, 502 U.S. 895 , 112 S.Ct. 265 , 116 L.Ed.2d 218 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Carey Robinzine
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lee v. McCaughtry, 892 F.2d 1318, 1325 (7th Cir.) (statements offered to explain why defendant changed his story not hearsay), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1006 , 110 S.Ct. 3244 , 111 L.Ed.2d 754 (1990) and 502 U.S. 895 , 112 S.Ct. 265 , 116 L.Ed.2d 218 (1991); United States v. Payne, 944 F.2d 1458, 1472 (9th Cir.1991) (statements offered to explain circumstances under which witness made earlier false statement not hearsay), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 975 , 112 S.Ct. 1598 , 118 L.Ed.2d 313 (1992).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Duvall
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Thomas, 932 F.2d 1085, 1091-92 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 895 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Curtiss J. Ostosh
6th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Moreno, 933 F.2d 362, 375 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 895 (1991). 8 Ostosh argues that the court should have required two witnesses to give depositions pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 15(a), in order to preserve their testimony.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Marcus Lacey
6th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
The decision of the district court regarding the redirect will be overturned only if there is a showing of abuse of discretion." Peco, 784 F.2d at 804 ; see also United States v. Moreno, 933 F.2d 362, 375 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 895 (1991) (reviewing a district court's evidentiary rulings under an abuse of discretion standard).
Pullock
v.
United States
No. 91-5496.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
502 U.S. 895
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.