green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cardona
See United States v. Rodriuez-Cardona, 924 F.2d 1148, 1154-57 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 809 , 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Orlando Figueroa
See United States v. Rodriguez-Cardona, 924 F.2d 1148, 1158 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 809 , 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Babbitt
To demonstrate laches, a party must establish (1) lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and (2) Lathan v. Brinegar, 506 F.2d 677, 692 (9th Cir.1974) (en banc) (quoting Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 282 , 81 S.Ct. 534, 543 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961) (emphasis added)); accord Daingerfield Island Protective Soc’y v. Lujan, 920 F.2d 32 , 37 (D.C.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 809 , 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); Portland Audubon Soc’y v. Lujan, 884 F.2d 1233, 1241 (9th Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Hbe Leasing Corporation v. Frank
See United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237, 243-44 (2d Cir.1989) (recognizing joint defense privilege), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 810 , 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andujar
See United States v. RodríguezCardona, 924 F.2d 1148, 1160 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 809 , 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 , (1991). “[O]ur experience has been that even imperfect formulations usually meet- constitutional requirements when viewed in the context of the entire charge.” Watkins v. Ponte, 987 F.2d 27, 32 (1st Cir.1993) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
HBE Leasing Corp. v. Frank
See United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237, 243-44 (2d Cir.1989) (recognizing joint defense privilege), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 810 , 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Apache Survival Coalition v. United States of America, and James Abbott, in His Official Capacity as Supervisor, Coronado National Forest, and the University of Arizona, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. Apache Survival Coalition v. United States of America, and James Abbott, in His Official Capacity as Supervisor, Coronado National Forest, and the University of Arizona, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee
To demonstrate laches, a party must establish " '(1) lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and (2) prejudice to the party asserting the defense.' " Lathan v. Brinegar, 506 F.2d 677, 692 (9th Cir.1974) (en banc) (quoting Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 282 , 81 S.Ct. 534, 543 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961) (emphasis added)); accord Daingerfield Island Protective Soc'y v. Lujan, 920 F.2d 32 , 37 (D.C.Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); Portland Audubon Soc'y v. Lujan, 884 F.2d 1233, 1241 (9th Cir.1989). 46 In environmental…
discussed
Cited "see"
Apache Survival Coalition v. United States
To demonstrate laches, a party must establish “‘(1) lack of diligence by the party against whom the defense is asserted, and (2) prejudice to the party asserting the defense.’ ” Lathan v. Brinegar, 506 F.2d 677, 692 (9th Cir.1974) (en banc) (quoting Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 282 , 81 S.Ct. 534, 543 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961) (emphasis added)); accord Daingerfield Island Protective Soc’y v. Lujan, 920 F.2d 32 , 37 (D.C.Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); Portland Audubon Soc’y v. Lujan, 884 F.2d 1233, 1241 (9th Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert F. Carrozza, United States of America v. Raymond J. Patriarca, United States of America v. Raymond J. Patriarca
See United States v. Glecier, 923 F.2d 496, 501 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); United States v. Phillips, 874 F.2d 123, 127-28 (3d Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434, and Jessie Oliver, Intervening v. William P. Clements, Etc., Jim Mattox v. Judge F. Harold Entz, Etc., Judge Sharolyn Wood, Etc., and George S. Bayoud, Jr., Etc., and Tom Rickhoff, Susan D. Reed, John J. Specia, Jr., Sid L. Harle, Sharon MacRae and Michael P. Pedan, Bexar County, Texas State District Judges
See U.S. v. Glecier, 923 F.2d 496, 498 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434 v. Clements
See U.S. v. Glecier, 923 F.2d 496, 498 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carolyn M. Schiffels v. Kemper Financial Services, Incorporated, a Corporation, Thomas H. Richards, Charles M. Kierscht
See United States v. Glecier, 923 F.2d 496, 500 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); Shearin, 885 F.2d at 1169 ; United States v. Angiulo, 847 F.2d 956, 964 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 138 , 102 L.Ed.2d 110 and cert. denied, 488 U.S. 928 , 109 S.Ct. 314 , 102 L.Ed.2d 332 (1988); United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1038 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 and cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Schwimmer
See United States v. Schwimmer, 924 F.2d 443 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Schwimmer
See United States v. Schwimmer, 924 F.2d 443 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Giuseppe Gambino, A/K/A \Joe
See United States v. Gambino, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harvey v. State
(2×)
See Felix, 112 S.Ct. at 1385 , Stevens, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, as well as the rational direction originally provided by United States v. Calderone, 917 F.2d 717 (2d Cir.1990), cert. granted and judgment vacated ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1657 , 118 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992) (now remanded by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Gambino, 920 F.2d 1108 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991), cert. granted and judgment vacated ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1657 , 118 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992) and not saw a hole into the constitutional…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Legarda
See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez-Cardona, 924 F.2d 1148, 1155 (1st Cir.) (affirming upward departure where defendant had, inter alia, “used a minor, a nine or ten year old boy, as a messenger in his drug business”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); United States v. Diaz-Villafane, 874 F.2d 43, 50 (1st Cir.) (affirming upward departure where defendant had, inter alia, used children to deliver drugs), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 862 , 110 S.Ct. 177 , 107 L.Ed.2d 133 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
A. Attorney-Client Privilege “The attorney-client privilege protects ‘[c]onfidential disclosures by a client to an attorney made in order to obtain legal assistance.’ ” In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 959 F.2d 1158, 1165 (2d Cir.1992) (quoting Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 403 , 96 S.Ct. 1569, 1577 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976)); see also United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 55 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991) (The attorney-client privilege prohibits an attorney from revealing confidential communications that pass in the course of profes…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Quintanilla and Leticia Gutierrez
See also United States v. Glecier, 923 F.2d 496, 499-500 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Barnett, United States of America v. Barry Jordan, (Two Cases)
See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez-Cardona, 924 F.2d 1148, 1155 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); United States v. Zuleta-Alvarez, 922 F.2d 33, 37 (1st Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2039 , 114 L.Ed.2d 123 (1991). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bailin
See United States v. Felix, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1377 , 118 L.Ed.2d 25 (1992) (even if defendant has already been prosecuted for crime, double jeopardy prohibition against multiple prosecutions does not bar prosecution for conspiracy to commit that crime because conspiracy and underlying crime are not "same offense"); United States v. Neapolitan, 791 F.2d 489, 501 (7th Cir.) (when indictment defines RICO conspiracy with reference to particular predicate acts, "crimes ... that do not appear in the indictment cannot serve as predicate acts" but "would be admissible as circumstantial evidence…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bailin
See United States v. Felix, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 1377 , 118 L.Ed.2d 25 (1992) (even if defendant has already been prosecuted for crime, double jeopardy prohibition against multiple prosecutions does not bar prosecution for conspiracy to commit that crime because conspiracy and underlying crime are not "same offense”); United States v. Neapolitan, 791 F.2d 489, 501 (7th Cir.) (when indictment defines RICO conspiracy with reference to particular predicate acts, "crimes ... that do not appear in the indictment cannot serve as predicate acts” but "would be admissible as circumstantial evidence…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin Lozada, Sr., as Father and Next Friend, for and on Behalf of Martin Lozada, Jr., a Minor v. United States
(2×)
Id. (citation omitted); see also Starns v. United States, 923 F.2d 34, 37 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991). 8 Lozada first argues that the federal government is not in "like circumstances" with a qualified health care provider which can take advantage of the Act's limits, because the federal government failed to comply with the specific requirements of the Nebraska Act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Private Sanitation Industry Ass'n of Nassau
See also United States v. Glecier, 923 F.2d 496 , 497 n. 1 (7th Cir.) (RICO pattern not unconstitutionally vague), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); United States v. Pungitore, 910 F.2d 1084, 1105 (3d Cir.1990) (“[W]e have doubts that a successful vagueness challenge to RICO could ever be raised by defendants in an organized crime case.”) (rejecting vagueness challenge to pattern element), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2009 , 114 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991); United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1180 (1st Cir.) (“A person of ordinary intelligence could not he…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salerno
This court has accordingly characterized Grady as “announcing] a new rule for double jeopardy claims arising in the context of successive prosecutions.” United States v. Calderone, 917 F.2d 717, 720 (2d Cir.1990), vacated and remanded, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1657 , 118 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992); see also United States v. Gambino, 920 F.2d 1108, 1112 (2d Cir. 1990) (Grady “significantly altered the jurisprudential landscape of double jeopardy”), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991), vacated and remanded, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1657 , 118 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992). 2 It is thu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, v Anthony Salerno Paul Castellano Aniello Dellacroce Gennaro Langella Anthony Corallo Salvatore Santoro Christopher Furnari, Sr. Philip Rastelli Ralph Scopo Carmine Persico Stefano Canone Anthony Indelicato, Carmine Persico and Gennaro Langella
This court has accordingly characterized Grady as "announc[ing] a new rule for double jeopardy claims arising in the context of successive prosecutions." United States v. Calderone, 917 F.2d 717, 720 (2d Cir.1990), vacated and remanded, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1657 , 118 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992); see also United States v. Gambino, 920 F.2d 1108, 1112 (2d Cir.1990) (Grady "significantly altered the jurisprudential landscape of double jeopardy"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991), vacated and remanded, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1657 , 118 L.Ed.2d 381 (1992). 2 2 This is…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raphael
Id. at 721 ; see also United States v. Gambino, 920 F.2d 1108, 1109 (2d Cir.1990) (overt acts for which defendant already prosecuted may not remain in conspiracy indictment), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 54 , 116 L.Ed.2d 31 (1991); United States v. Russo, 906 F.2d 77, 78 (2d Cir.1990) (per curiam) (later prosecution of predicate act alleged in RICO indictment of which defendant acquitted remanded for entering of nolle prosequi).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodriguez-Cardona
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-1686.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.