green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.6 score
“hen the regulation itself is not a 'valid' exercise of the police power, united states supreme court precedents imply that no matter how 'far' it goes, the regulation may constitute a taking”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
pjrivilege may implicitly be waived when defendant asserts a claim that in fairness requires examination of protected communications.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gangemi v. Zoning Board of Appeals
hen the regulation itself is not a 'valid' exercise of the police power, united states supreme court precedents imply that no matter how 'far' it goes, the regulation may constitute a taking
discussed
Cited "see"
Rapoport v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS STAMFORD
See Port Clinton Associates v. Board of Selectmen, 217 Conn. 588, 591-93 , 587 A.2d 126 (involving regulation of building fines in waterway bordering town of Clinton pursuant to state *49 statute authorizing ordinance regarding establishment of building lines in certain waterways), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 814 , 112 S. Ct. 64 , 116 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. Schneider
In deciding whether expert testimony will be helpful to the fact-finder, the Court must determine whether the testimony “usurp[s] either the role of the trial judge in instructing the jury as to the applicable law or the role of the jury in applying that law to the facts before it.” United States v. Lumpkin, 192 F.3d 280, 289 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting United States v. Duncan, 42 F.3d 97, 101 (2d Cir.1994)) (internal quotation marks omitted); accord United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1294 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
King-Fisher Co. v. United States
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); In re von Bulow, 828 F.2d 94 (2d Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Steffen v. Gray, Harris & Robinson, P.A.
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Tesser v. Board of Education
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Vernon E. Spencer v. Stuart Hall Company, Inc., a Missouri Corporation Newell Company, a Delaware Corporation
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1296 (2d Cir.) (evidence otherwise inadmissable as too prejudicial under Rule 403 may be “admissible to rebut testimony elicited on cross examination that created a false impression”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); United States v. Womochil, 778 F.2d 1311, 1317 (8th Cir.1985) (finding no abuse of district court’s discretion in allowing “otherwise inadmissible evidence on redirect to clarify the issue” when opposing counsel had left a false impression after cross-examination).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hsia
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1301 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); United States v. Candella, 487 F.2d 1223, 1228 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 1563 , 39 L.Ed.2d 872 (1974); United States v. Crop Growers Corp., 954 F.Supp. 335, 353 (D.D.C.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re PFOHL Bros. Landfill Litigation
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991)(defendant client’s advice of counsel basis for “good faith belief’ that securities transactions were not fraudulent as a defense to stock fraud indictment placed legal advice evidencing client’s knowledge of the law directly in issue); WLIGTV, Inc. v. Cablevision Systems Corp., 879 F.Supp. 229 (E.D.N.Y.1994)(plaintiffs invocation of equitable doctrines of fraudulent concealment and fraudulent inducement to bypass a statute of limitations bar placed plaintiffs…
cited
Cited "see"
Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of Groton, No. 529192 (Dec. 9, 1996)
See Port Clinton Associates v. Board of Selectmen , 217 Conn. 588 , 587 A.2d 126 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 814 , 112 S.Ct. 64 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Livingstone v. North Belle Vernon Borough
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991) (holding that a party who asserts a claim that "in fairness requires examination of protected communications" thereby waives the attorney-client privilege as to those communications).
discussed
Cited "see"
Livingstone v. North Belle Vernon Borough
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991) (holding that a party who asserts a claim that “in fairness requires examination of protected communications” thereby waives the attorney-client privilege as to those communications).
discussed
Cited "see"
Geiger v. Solomon-Page Group, Ltd.
(2×)
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1298 (2d Cir.) (“[W]e decline to hold that the information required to be disclosed in [Regulation] 13D is material per se for purposes of § 10(b) simply because such disclosure is required under the securities laws.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1298 (2d Cir.) (stock movement is a factor the jury may consider relevant in determining materiality), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1298 (2d Cir.) (stock movement is a factor the jury may consider relevant in determining materiality), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of College Station, Tx v. City of Bryan, Tx
(2×)
See Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 924 F.2d 539, 545 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 814 , 112 S.Ct. 64 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991) (court considered reasonableness of offer from perspective of the monopolist, and held that the reasonableness standard did not guarantee that antitrust plaintiffs would make profit). 12 In this case, given the relatively late formal request for wheeling services, given the absence of prior requests by College Station for wheeling services exclusively, given Defendants’ apparent relative inexperience in transmission pricing for large cont…
discussed
Cited "see"
CONTINI BY CONTINI v. Hyundai Motor Co.
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1294-95 (2d Cir.) (experts should not testify to legal conclusions but it was not error for an expert to testify to the background of securities regulation, filing requirements and hypotheticals without testifying that the defendant’s behavior violated-the securities law), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nafez Anthony Karam, Also Known as Tony Karam, United States of America v. George Antoun Haro, United States of America v. Antoine Youssef El Hani, Also Known as Tony El Hani
See United States v. Stephenson, 924 F.2d 753, 763 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991) (rule 404(b) inapplicable when disputed evidence relevant to the charged crime itself).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Karam
See United States v. Stephenson, 924 F.2d 753, 763 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991) (rule 404(b) inapplicable when disputed evidence relevant to the charged crime itself).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul A. Bilzerian
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991). *692 The same conduct that led to Bilzerian’s criminal convictions forms the basis of the SEC’s civil action against him.
discussed
Cited "see"
Concerned Area Residents for the Environment v. Southview Farm
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1294-95 (2d Cir.) (since expert’s general testimony was not objected to at trial, admissibility issue was waived), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Alan Starr
See United States v. Stephenson, 924 F.2d 753 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 and — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 321 , 116 L.Ed.2d 262 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Childress v. Taylor
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1291-94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Turner & Newall, PLC
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Turner & Newall, Plc
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991). 30 If opposing counsel is allowed access to information arguably protected by the privilege before an adjudication as to whether the privilege applies, a pertinent aspect of confidentiality will be lost, even though communications later deemed to be privileged will be inadmissible at trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ervan Purnell v. Elaine A. Lord, Walter E. Kelly
See United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1296 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lawrence v. Dept. of Energy & Environmental Protection
There is no reason why, because of its peculiar nature as property, this right cannot, like any other property right, be made subject to reasonable police regulation in the interest of the public welfare." (Citations omitted.) Shorehaven Golf Club, Inc. v. Water Resources Commission, 146 Conn. 619 , 624, 153 A.2d 444 (1959) ; see also Port Clinton Associates v. Board of Selectmen, 217 Conn. 588 , 598, 587 A.2d 126 ("[t]he owner of riparian rights ... has the right to build a pier or wharf past the low water mark subject to the qualification that he thereby does no injury to the free navigation…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William A. Gross Construction Associates, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance
The Second Circuit has stated “that fairness considerations arise when [a] party attempts to use [a] privilege both as ‘a shield and a sword.’ ” In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 219 F.3d 175, 182 (2d Cir. 2000) ; see also, e.g., United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); In re von Bulow, 828 F.2d 94, 103 (2d Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lowry
See, e.g., United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1301-02 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); United States v. Smith, 891 F.2d 703, 711-13 (9th Cir.1989), amended 906 F.2d 385 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 811 , 111 S.Ct. 47 , 112 L.Ed.2d 23 (1990); May v. United States, 175 F.2d 994 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 830 , 70 S.Ct. 58 , 94 L.Ed. 505 (1949); United States v. Berlin, 707 F.Supp. 832 (E.D.Va.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Federation Internationale De Basketball
See, e.g., United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); Brimley v. Hardee’s Food Systems, Inc., No. 93 Civ. 1797(LAK), 1995 WL 51177 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Perrigo Company
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir.) (“A defendant may not use the [attorney-client] privilege to prejudice his opponent’s case or to disclose some selected communications for self-serving purposes.”), cer t. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); Houston , 532 N.W.2d at 516 (“[A party] cannot be allowed, after disclosing as much as he pleases, to withhold the remainder.”) (quoting 8 Wig-more, Evidence (McNaughton rev.) § 2327, pp. 636-38).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation
(2×)
See also United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1291-94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, [ 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 ] (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Sinclair
Compare Marx & Co., Inc. v. Diners' Club, Inc., 550 F.2d 505 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 861 , 98 S.Ct. 188 , 54 L.Ed.2d 134 (1977) with United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1294-95 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Celotex Corp. v. Hillsborough Holdings Corp. (In Re Hillsborough Holdings Corp.)
The waiver of the privilege is based upon a premise that “when a party’s conduct reaches a certain point of disclosure, fairness requires that the privilege cease.” Id., citing Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. Blondis, 412 F.Supp. 286, 288 (N.D.Ill.1976); see also United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 813 , 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.
See also United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1291-94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arch Trading Company
See, e.g., United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1301-02 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); United States v. Smith, 891 F.2d 703, 711-13 (9th Cir.1989), amended 906 F.2d 385 (1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 811 , 111 S.Ct. 47 , 112 L.Ed.2d 23 (1990); May v. United States, 175 F.2d 994 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 830 , 70 S.Ct. 58 , 94 L.Ed. 505 (1949); United States v. Berlin, 707 F.Supp. 832 (E.D.Va.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gribben
Section 1001 , it is not an element of the second clause. 4 See United States v. Marchisio, 344 F.2d 653, 666 (1965) (“Materiality ... is not one of the essential elements of proof in a prosecution for false statements under § 1001, with the exception of the first clause of the statute”); see also U.S. v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1299 (2d Cir.1991) (“Under our decisions, materiality of the statement is not an element of the offense [of making a false statement under Section 1001]”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Valley National Bank
See e.g., United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1294 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 63 , 116 L.Ed.2d 39 (1991); United States v. Scop, 846 F.2d 135, 139-40 , modified, 856 F.2d 5 (2d Cir.1988); Marx & Co. v. Diners’ Club Inc., 550 F.2d at 509-12 . 11 There is, however, one possible set of circumstances in which discovery of the Department’s internally stated views of the law might become discoverable.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bilzerian
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-1803.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1) · Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.