discussed Cited "see" United States v. Brian Matlock See Mason v. Groose, 942 F.2d 515, 516 (8th Cir.1991) (holding order that simply adopted magistrate’s report and recommendation by reference was separate document for purposes of Rule 58), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1039 , 112 S.Ct. 891 , 116 L.Ed.2d 794 (1992); see also Kidd v. District of Columbia, 206 F.3d 35, 41 (D.C.Cir.2000) (same), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1071 , 121 S.Ct. 761 , 148 L.Ed.2d 663 (2001).

discussed Cited "see" Walter Kadelski v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services See Mason v. Groose, 942 F.2d 515, 516 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 891 , 116 L.Ed.2d 794 (1992) (order adopting Magistrate’s report and recommendation satisfies Rule 58); Laidley v. McClain, 914 F.2d 1386, 1390 (10th Cir.1990) (same); Alman v. Taunton Sportswear Mfg.

discussed Cited "see" Lia Yang v. Donna E. Shalala, Hhs, Secretary See Mason v. Groose, 942 F.2d 515, 516 (8th Cir.1991) (finding that an “order” which simply adopts a magistrate’s report and recommendation by reference is a separate document for Rule 58 purposes), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 891 , 116 L.Ed.2d 794 (1992); Laidley v. McClain, 914 F.2d 1386,1390 (10th Cir.1990); United States v. Perez, 736 F.2d 236,238 (5th Cir.1984) (per curiam).