green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
the City of Galveston, Texas v. Joe Murphy, Yoram Ben-Amram and Galtex Development, LLC
See City of El Paso v. Madero Dev., 803 S.W.2d 396, 401 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1991, writ denied), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992) (reversing trial court’s judgment and dismissing based on lack of ripeness despite two city alderman stating "words to' the effect that they wished to impede the development of the propérty by zoning the property” for more restrictive use (citing Mayhew )). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Cowan v. Treetop Enterprises, Inc.
See Waffle House, 1983 WL 2108 , Murray v. Stuckey’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992), Meyer v. Worsley Companies, 881 F.Supp. 1014, 1020 (E.D.N.C.1994). 16 .
cited
Cited "see"
Town of Sunnyvale v. Mayhew
See City of El Paso v. Madero Dev., 803 S.W.2d 396, 400 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1991, writ denied), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Hey
See Committee on Legal Ethics v. Farber, 185 W.Va. 522 , 408 S.E.2d 274 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Shockley v. City of Newport News
A. The Executive Exemption The regulations provide both a “short test” and a “long test” for determining whether an employee’s primary duty is management. 29 C.F.R. § 541.1 ; see Murray v. Stuckey’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 , 617 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard E. Shockley Ray v. Ballard, Jr. Michael L. Brewer Clifford T. Bowen David E. Burgess William T. Cordle David C. Dorner Thomas L. Duggan Henry Marvin Evans Joseph R. George Milton B. Hallet James L. Hogan, Jr. Joe McKinley Johnson Carl S. Morgan, III Leola A. Mowry Arthur D. Nolan Lynn M. Pearson Thomas L. Penny James E. Quail Davis Alberts Seals, Sr. Wayne Wright Smith Donald E. Spitzer Joseph R. Storms Ronald K. Suttle Jimmy Sutton David P. Wescott Linda Scott Wescott Daniel E. Wickline Raymond E. Wilson, Sr. Roy Sorrell Harry Cleveland West Ronald T. Conley v. City of Newport News, and City of Newport News Police Department, Howard E. Shockley Ray v. Ballard, Jr. Michael L. Brewer Clifford T. Bowen David E. Burgess William T. Cordle David C. Dorner Thomas L. Duggan Henry Marvin Evans Joseph R. George Milton B. Hallet James L. Hogan, Jr. Joe McKinley Johnson Carl S. Morgan, III Leola A. Mowry Arthur D. Nolan Lynn M. Pearson Thomas L. Penny James E. Quail Davis Alberts Seals, Sr. Wayne Wright Smith Donald E. Spitzer Joseph R. Storms Ronald K. Suttle Jimmy Sutton David P. Wescott Linda Scott Wescott Daniel E. Wickline Raymond E. Wilson, Sr. Roy Sorrell Harry Cleveland West Ronald T. Conley v. City of Newport News, and City of Newport News Police Department
A. The Executive Exemption 30 The regulations provide both a "short test" and a "long test" for determining whether an employee's primary duty is management. 29 C.F.R. § 541.1 ; see Murray v. Stuckey's, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 , 617 (8th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. Ellerbe Becket Construction Services, Inc.
(2×)
See Spinden, 94 F.3d at 427 ; see also Murray v. Stuckey’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 , 618 (8th Cir.1991) (holding that fact that employee spent 65 to 90 percent of time on nonexempt tasks was not controlling factor under the regulations), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992). “[A]n employee’s primary duty is that which is of principle importance to the employer rather than collateral tasks which may take up more than 50% of his or her time.” Id.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Jones Restaurants, Inc.
The Burger King court’s reasoning is equally applicable here: “The exercise of discretion ... even where circumscribed by prior instruction, is as critical to [the company’s] success as adherence to ‘the book.’ Burger King, of course, seeks to limit likely mistakes in judgment by issuing detailed guidelines, but judgments must still be made.” Id. at 521-22 ; see also Murray v. Stuckey’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 614 , 619 (8th Cir.1991) (“[W]e do not believe that the local store manager’s job is any less managerial for FLSA purposes simply because he or she has an active regional manag…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fain v. State
(2×)
Of Commerce, 649 S.W.2d 769, 771-72 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1983, no writ); see also City of El Paso v. Madero Development, 803 S.W.2d 396, 399 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1991, writ denied), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992) (there are three jurisdictional elements: jurisdiction over subject matter; jurisdiction over person or res; and power to render judgment or relief under the circumstances).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mayer v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF CHASE COUNTY
See Spinden v. GS Roofing Products Co., Inc., 94 F.3d 421 (8th Cir.1996) cert, denied„ — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1254 , 137 L.Ed.2d 334 (1997) (plant controller in charge of “essentially a one-man department” was an exempt administrative employee even though he spent most of his time doing bookkeeping functions); Reich v. Avoca Motel Corp., 82 F.3d 238 (8th Cir. 1996) (administrative exemption covers motel managers who spent a significant amount of time on-call and doing non-exempt work); Strieker v. Eastern Off Road Equipment, Inc., 935 F.Supp. 650 (D.Md.1996) (administrative exemption appl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grimes v. Kinney Shoe Corp.
See, e.g., Murray v. Stuckley’s Inc., 939 F.2d 614 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1073 , 112 S.Ct. 970 , 117 L.Ed.2d 135 (1992); O’Dell v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co., 856 F.2d 1452, 1453-54 (9th Cir.1988); Donovan v. Burger King Corp., 675 F.2d 516, 518, 521 (2nd Cir.1982) (Donovan II); Donovan v. Burger King Corp., 672 F.2d 221 (1st Cir.1982) (Donovan I); Russell v. Mini-Mart, Inc., 711 F.Supp. 556 (D.Mont.1988); Stein v. J.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Farber
v.
Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar
v.
Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar
No. 91-890.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1992.
Published
Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.