McCoy v. United States, 504 U.S. 979 (1992). · Go Syfert
Search
McCoy v. United States, 504 U.S. 979 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the general rule on preemption in admiralty is that states may supplement federal admiralty law as applied to matters of local concern, so long as state law does not actually conflict with federal law... .”
28 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rogers v. City of Richmond (vaed, 2012-03-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Rogers v. City of Richmond
E.D. Va. · 2012 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
california's more protective overtime provisions are compatible with, rather than conflict with, the .
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Tampa Port Authority v. M/V DUCHESS
M.D. Fla. · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the general rule on preemption in admiralty is that states may supplement federal admiralty law as applied to matters of local concern, so long as state law does not actually conflict with federal law... .
cited Cited "see" Department of Labor v. Brugh
Wash. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: accord · confidence high
App. at 30-31 ; accord Common Carriers, 111 Wn.2d at 589 (possibility of interference does not justify preemption). 918 F.2d 1409 , 1424 (9th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 979 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" Bureerong v. Uvawas
C.D. Cal. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass’n v. Aubry, 918 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 979 , 112 S.Ct. 2956 , 119 L.Ed.2d 578 (1992) (FLSA does not broadly preempt state wage laws that are more protective than the FLSA). 31 .
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (2×)
S.D.W. Va · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass’n v. Aubry, 918 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 979 , 112 S.Ct. 2956 , 119 L.Ed.2d 578 , and cert. denied sub. nom., Tidewater Marine Serv., Inc. v. Aubry, 504 U.S. 979 , 112 S.Ct. 2956 , 119 L.Ed.2d 578 (1992); Pettis Moving Co., Inc. v. Roberts, 784 F.2d 439,441 (2nd Cir.1986); Williams v. W.M.A.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Keeley v. Loomis Fargo & Co.
D.N.J. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Pacific Merchant Shipping Ass’n v. Aubry, 918 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir.1990) (seamen exempt under § 13(b)(6) not exempt under California’s overtime law), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 979 , 112 S.Ct. 2956 , 119 L.Ed.2d 578 (1992); Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 14 Cal.4th 557 , 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 186 , 927 P.2d 296 (1996) (same), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1862 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1062 (1997); Santoni Roig, 688 F.Supp. at 818 (air carrier employees exempt under § 13(b)(3) not exempt under Puerto Rico’s overtime law); Berry v. KRTV Communications, 262 Mont. 415 , 865 P.2d 1104…
McCoy
v.
United States
No. 91-8205.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 1992.
504 U.S. 979
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: M.D. Florida (1) · E.D. Virginia (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.