green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1998 ·
…the silence as to indian tribes does not 'clearly' indicate congress intended to restrict tribal taxation; more likely it indicates congress did not consider the subject.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Bay Plastics, Inc. v. BT Commercial Corp. (In Re Bay Plastics, Inc.)
But see Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Pearl Brewing Co. (In re Kaiser Steel Corp.), 952 F.2d 1230 (10th Cir.1991), cert denied, 505 U.S. 1213 , 112 S.Ct. 3015 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992), where the court held that the trustee could not recover from selling shareholders of a publicly traded corporation because their payments constituted non-avoidable "settlement payments” under Bankruptcy Code § 546(e), 11 U.S.C.A. § 546 (e) (West 1993). 32 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
Maynard v. Agency
But see Wiener v. FBI, 943 F.2d 972 , 981 n.15 (9th Cir. 1991) (asking under Executive Order 12356 whether it is reasonable to expect disclosure of a twenty-year-old investigation to reveal the existence of a current intelligence investigation), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 3013 (1992). 10.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Beatrice Maynard v. Central Intelligence Agency, Beatrice Maynard v. Central Intelligence Agency
But see Wiener v. FBI, 943 F.2d 972 , 981 n. 15 (9th Cir.1991) (asking under Executive Order 12356 whether it is reasonable to expect disclosure of a twenty-year-old investigation to reveal the existence of a current intelligence investigation), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992). 10 .The name of these indices is derived from the seminal case, Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (D.C.Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 1564 , 39 L.Ed.2d 873 (1974). 11 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Labor Relations Board v. Pueblo of San Juan
(2×)
the silence as to indian tribes does not 'clearly' indicate congress intended to restrict tribal taxation; more likely it indicates congress did not consider the subject.
cited
Cited "see"
Rubin v. Valicenti Advisory Services, Inc.
See Chemung Canal Trust Co. v. Sovran Bank/Maryland, 939 F.2d 12, 16 (2d Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3014 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad v. Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Reservation
(2×)
See Burlington N. R.R. v. Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian Reservation, 924 F.2d 899 (9th Cir.1991) (Bu rlington I), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company v. The Assiniboine And Sioux Tribes Of The Fort Peck Reservation
(2×)
See Burlington N. R.R. v. Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian Reservation, 924 F.2d 899 (9th Cir.1991) ( Burlington I ), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buchanan v. Sokaogon Chippewa Tribe
(2×)
See Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Blackfeet Tribe, 924 F.2d 899, 901 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992); Weeks Construction, Inc. v. Oglala Sioux Housing Authority, 797 F.2d 668, 670-71 (8th Cir.1986); Hardin v. White Mountain Apache Tribe, 779 F.2d 476, 479 (9th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. United States Department of Interior
See Wiener v. FBI, 943 F.2d 972 , 985 (9th Cir.1991) (Exemption 7 requires rational nexus between law enforcement duties and documents withheld under exemption), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
O'Neill, Lysaght & Sun v. Drug Enforcement Administration
See Wiener v. FBI, 943 F.2d 972 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen v. Gallante
See Chemung Canal Trust Co. v. Sovran Bank/Maryland, 939 F.2d 12, 14 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3014 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992); Pressroom Unions-Printers League Income Security Fund v. Continental Assurance Co., 700 F.2d 889, 892 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 845 , 104 S.Ct. 148 , 78 L.Ed.2d 138 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Lyman D. Spurlock v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation
See Wiener v. F.B.I., 943 F.2d 972 , 988 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, General Truck Drivers, Office, Food & Warehouse Local 952 v. American Delivery Service Co.
See Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Wilson, 915 F.2d 535, 538-39 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992) (Holding that claim for fraudulent inducement to ratify CBA did not require interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Brotherhood v. American Delivery
See Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Wilson, 915 F.2d 535, 538-39 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992) (Holding that claim for fraudulent inducement to ratify CBA did not require interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement). 9 Ward's argument requires us to examine the tricky relationship between the doctrines of Section 301(a) preemption and Garmon preemption.
cited
Cited "see"
Corbin v. Blankenburg
See Chemung Canal Trust Co. v. Sovran Bank/Maryland, 939 F.2d 12, 14 (2nd Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3014 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Protocare of Metropolitan N.Y., Inc. v. Mutual Ass'n Administrators, Inc.
See id. (no legislative intent to “grant a former fiduciary a continuing right to sue”); Pressroom Unions v. Continental, 700 F.2d 889 , 892 (2d Cir.) (no legislative intent to extend standing for “other parties not listed”), cert. dismissed, 463 U.S. 1233 , 104 S.Ct. 26 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1449 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael A. Costantino, on Behalf of the Class of v. Trw, Inc. Jake Schoepler, Secretary, Board of Administrators Trw Salaried Pension Plan
See Tilley v. Mead, 927 F.2d 756 , 760 (4th Cir.1991) (construing pre-REA plan, holding that subsidies were not protected), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992); Amato v. Western Union Int’l Inc., 773 F.2d 1402 (2d Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 474 U.S. 1113 , 106 S.Ct. 1167 , 89 L.Ed.2d 288 (1986) (holding that subsidies were protected); Bencivenga v. Western Penn.
discussed
Cited "see"
John Flanagan v. Inland Empire Electrical Workers Pension Plan & Trust
See Tilley v. Mead Corp., 927 F.2d 756, 760 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992). 12 Section 2.21 of the Plan document defines a participant in the Plan as 13 an Employee or former Employee who has become a Participant in the Plan in accordance with section 4.01 and who is participating in the Plan in one of the categories of participation specified in section 4.02. 14 Flanagan and Missett became participants under section 4.01, prior to their layoff, because their employer had begun making contributions on their behalf.
cited
Cited "see"
Flanagan v. Inland Empire Electrical Workers Pension Plan & Trust
See Tilley v. Mead Corp., 927 F.2d 756, 760 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brian Dickerson v. Department of Justice
See Wiener v. FBI, 943 F.2d 972 , 977 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992) (quoting Vaughn v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820, 824 (D.C.Cir.1973), ce rt. denied, 415 U.S. 977 , 94 S.Ct. 1564 , 39 L.Ed.2d 873 (1974) (“ ‘This lack of knowledge by the party seeking disclosure seriously distorts the traditional adversary nature of our legal system.”’).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris Trust and Savings Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co.
See, e.g., Chemung Canal Trust Co. v. Sovran Bank/Maryland, 939 F.2d 12,16 (2d Cir.1991) (defendants in ERISA breach of fiduciary duty cases may assert claims for contribution and indemnity against co-fiduciaries), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3014 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Samuel Gruber Education Project v. United States Department of Justice
Compare Keys v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 830 F.2d 337, 350 (D.C.Cir.1987) (upholding use of indexing system where “the affidavit placed each document into its historical and investigative context”) with King, 830 F.2d at 221 (similar coding system found wanting “because we are left with no contextual description for documents or substantial portions of documents withheld in their entirety”) and Wiener v. FBI, 943 F.2d 972, 978-79 (9th Cir.1991) (“boilerplate” explanations of coded index found inadequate since “[n]o effort is made to tailor the explanation to the specific…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LNC Investments, Inc. v. First Fidelity Bank, National Ass'n
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 110 , 109 S.Ct. 948, 954 , 103 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989); see also Chemung Canal Trust Co. v. Sovran Bank, 939 F.2d 12 , 16-18 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3014 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eric Davin v. United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation
(2×)
Compare Keys v. United States Dep't of Justice, 830 F.2d 337, 350 (D.C.Cir.1987) (upholding use of indexing system where "the affidavit placed each document into its historical and investigative context") with King, 830 F.2d at 221 (similar coding system found wanting "because we are left with no contextual description for documents or substantial portions of documents withheld in their entirety") and Wiener v. FBI, 943 F.2d 972 , 978-79 (9th Cir.1991) ("boilerplate" explanations of coded index found inadequate since "[n]o effort is made to tailor the explanation to the specific document withh…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowen v. Doyle
(2×)
See, e.g., Burlington N. R.R. v. Blackfeet Tribe, 924 F.2d 899 , 902 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992); Wisconsin v. Baker, 698 F.2d 1323, 1332-33 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207 , 103 S.Ct. 3537 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Corder v. Howard Johnson & Company
See, e.g., Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Wilson, 915 F.2d 535 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992); Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. B & E Backhoe Inc., 911 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir.1990). 5 Two cases cited by Howard Johnson & Co. fall within this exception.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Corder v. Howard Johnson & Co.
See, e.g., Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Wilson, 915 F.2d 535 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992); Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. B & E Backhoe Inc., 911 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir.1990). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Corder v. Howard Johnson & Co.
See, e.g., Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Wilson, 915 F.2d 535 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992); Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. B & E Backhoe Inc., 911 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir.1990). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dean Corder v. Howard Johnson & Company
See, e.g., Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Wilson, 915 F.2d 535 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 886 (1992); Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. B & E Backhoe Inc., 911 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir.1990). 5 Two cases cited by Howard Johnson & Co. fall within this exception.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Union Carbide Corp. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
(2×)
See, e.g., Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Blackfeet Tribe of Blackfeet Indian Reservation, 924 F.2d 899 , 901 n. 2 (9th Cir.1991) (citing Iowa Mutual Insurance), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1212 , 112 S.Ct. 3013 , 120 L.Ed.2d 887 (1992); Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. State of Arizona, 559 F.Supp. 1237, 1249 (D.Ariz. 1983) (abstention).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burlington Northern Railroad Co.
v.
Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation
v.
Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation
No. 91-545.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1992.
C. A. 9th Cir. Motions of Reservation Telephone Cooperative and Association of American Railroads for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Motion of California et al. for leave to file supplemental brief as amici curiae denied. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.