Fed. Pac. Elec. Co. v. Newton, 506 U.S. 863 (1992). · Go Syfert
Fed. Pac. Elec. Co. v. Newton, 506 U.S. 863 (1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
83 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ruben Desantiago-Flores (ca10, 1997-02-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ruben Desantiago-Flores
10th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1293 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" Alameda Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Oakland, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, Newspaper Guild, Intervenor-Appellant
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See North Mississippi Communications, Inc. v. Jones, 792 F.2d 1330, 1336-37 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992) (holding that “[although the Times may have had no ‘right’ to receive certain legal advertisements from the County Board of Supervisors, it would violate the Constitution for the Board to withhold public patronage, in the form of its advertising, from the Times in retaliation for that newspapers exercise of its first amendment rights ... by publishing editorials and news stories critical of the Board and its members”); Review Pu…
discussed Cited "see" Finegold, Alexander + Associates, Inc. v. Setty & Associates, Ltd.
D.C. Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See S & M Constructors, Inc. v. FoleyCo., 959 F.2d 97 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992); see also United States v. Munsey Trust Co., 332 U.S. 234, 241 , 67 S.Ct. 1599, 1602-03 , 91 L.Ed. 2022 (1947); United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730, 737 , 64 S.Ct. 820, 823-24 , 88 L.Ed. 1039 (1944); Merritt v. United States, 267 U.S. 338, 341 , 45 S.Ct. 278, 279 , 69 L.Ed. 643 (1925); American Fidelity Co. v. National City Bank of Evansville, 266 F.2d 910, 916 (D.C.Cir.1959); S.Rep.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jaime Ramos, Jose Angel Castorena, Andres Ramos, Armando Espinosa, and Jose Alvaro Cervantes
5th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992). 14 . 486 U.S. 153 , 108 S.Ct. 1692 , 100 L.Ed.2d 140 (1988). 15 . 569 F.2d 1318, 1323 (5th Cir.1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Timothy Lynn Calverley
5th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1296 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992); United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975). .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Investment Enterprises, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1291 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rodriguez Pena
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1292 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Velazquez Rotger
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285 , ___ ____ _____________ _______ 1292 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 185 , _____ ______ 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ritzel Communications, Inc. v. Mid-American Cellular Telephone Company
3rd Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp., 705 F.2d 998 , 999 n. 1 (8th Cir.1983); see also S & M Constructors, Inc. v. Foley Co., 959 F.2d 97 (8th Cir.) (granting oral argument on a motion for a stay of arbitration pending appeal), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992). 22 Arbitration clauses in agreements are designed to resolve disputes without costly litigation.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ritzel Communications, Inc. v. Mid-American Cellular Telephone Co.
8th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp., 705 F.2d 998 , 999 n. 1 (8th Cir.1983); see also S & M Constructors, Inc. v. Foley Co., 959 F.2d 97 (8th Cir.) (granting oral argument on a motion for a stay of arbitration pending appeal), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Pacific Electric Co.
v.
Newton et ux.
No. 92-55.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
506 U.S. 863
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.