green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruben Desantiago-Flores
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1293 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alameda Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Oakland, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, Newspaper Guild, Intervenor-Appellant
See North Mississippi Communications, Inc. v. Jones, 792 F.2d 1330, 1336-37 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992) (holding that “[although the Times may have had no ‘right’ to receive certain legal advertisements from the County Board of Supervisors, it would violate the Constitution for the Board to withhold public patronage, in the form of its advertising, from the Times in retaliation for that newspapers exercise of its first amendment rights ... by publishing editorials and news stories critical of the Board and its members”); Review Pu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Finegold, Alexander + Associates, Inc. v. Setty & Associates, Ltd.
See S & M Constructors, Inc. v. FoleyCo., 959 F.2d 97 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992); see also United States v. Munsey Trust Co., 332 U.S. 234, 241 , 67 S.Ct. 1599, 1602-03 , 91 L.Ed. 2022 (1947); United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730, 737 , 64 S.Ct. 820, 823-24 , 88 L.Ed. 1039 (1944); Merritt v. United States, 267 U.S. 338, 341 , 45 S.Ct. 278, 279 , 69 L.Ed. 643 (1925); American Fidelity Co. v. National City Bank of Evansville, 266 F.2d 910, 916 (D.C.Cir.1959); S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jaime Ramos, Jose Angel Castorena, Andres Ramos, Armando Espinosa, and Jose Alvaro Cervantes
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 863 , 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992). 14 . 486 U.S. 153 , 108 S.Ct. 1692 , 100 L.Ed.2d 140 (1988). 15 . 569 F.2d 1318, 1323 (5th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Lynn Calverley
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1296 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992); United States v. Mandujano, 499 F.2d 370, 376 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1114 , 95 S.Ct. 792 , 42 L.Ed.2d 812 (1975). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Investment Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Great Western Litho & Bindery, Donald P. Browning, California Publishers Liquidating Corporation, Michael Warner, Video Team, Inc. And Susan C. Colvin, United States of America v. California Publishers Liquidating Corp., Video Team, Inc., Donald P. Browning, and Michael Warner
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1291 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Investment Enterprises, Inc.
See United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1291 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodriguez Pena
See, e.g., United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285, 1292 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 185 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Velazquez Rotger
See, e.g., United States v. Salazar, 958 F.2d 1285 , ___ ____ _____________ _______ 1292 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 185 , _____ ______ 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ritzel Communications, Inc. v. Mid-American Cellular Telephone Company
Corp., 705 F.2d 998 , 999 n. 1 (8th Cir.1983); see also S & M Constructors, Inc. v. Foley Co., 959 F.2d 97 (8th Cir.) (granting oral argument on a motion for a stay of arbitration pending appeal), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992). 22 Arbitration clauses in agreements are designed to resolve disputes without costly litigation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ritzel Communications, Inc. v. Mid-American Cellular Telephone Co.
Corp., 705 F.2d 998 , 999 n. 1 (8th Cir.1983); see also S & M Constructors, Inc. v. Foley Co., 959 F.2d 97 (8th Cir.) (granting oral argument on a motion for a stay of arbitration pending appeal), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 184 , 121 L.Ed.2d 129 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Pacific Electric Co.
v.
Newton et ux.
v.
Newton et ux.
No. 92-55.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.