green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Lava Shadows, Ltd. v. Johnson
But see Fincher v. B&D Air Conditioning & Heating Co., 816 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.Ct.App.1991), writ denied (Tex. Feb. 26, 1992), and cert. denied, 506 U.S. 823 , 113 S.Ct. 77 , 121 L.Ed.2d 41 (1992). 8.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sjogren v. Land Assoc., LLC
"A judgment rendered by a court of a sister State is accorded 'the same credit, validity, and effect, in every other court of the United States, which it had in the state where it was pronounced' " ( All Terrain Props. v Hoy , 265 AD2d 87, 91 [1st Dept 2000], quoting Hampton v M'Connel , 3 Wheat [16 US] 234, 235 [1818]; accord Mortgage Money Unlimited v Schaffer , 1 AD3d 773 , 774 [3d Dept 2003]).Our review of the foreign judgment at issue is "limited to determining whether the rendering court had jurisdiction" ( Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr. , 78 NY2d 572, 577 [1991], cert denied 506 US…
cited
Cited "see"
State of New Jersey v. George A. Myers
See In re Two Seized Firearms, 127 N.J. 84, 89-90 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 823 , 113 S. Ct. 75 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Jacobowitz v. Board of Assessors for Town of Cornwall
“A waiver of constitutional rights must be knowing and intelligent” (id. at 111; see Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572, 581 [1991], cert denied 506 US 823 [1992]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Steven M. Garber & Associates v. Zuber
“Absent a jurisdictional challenge, a final judgment entered upon the defendant’s default in appearing in an action is . . . entitled to be given full faith and credit in the courts of this State” (GNOC Corp. v Cappelletti, 208 AD2d 498 [1994]; see Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572, 577 [1991], rearg denied 79 NY2d 916 [1992], cert denied 506 US 823 [1992]).
discussed
Cited "see"
STEVEN M. GARBER & ASSOCIATES v. ZUBER, KIM JOHN
“Absent a jurisdictional challenge, a final judgment entered upon the defendant’s default in appearing in an action is . . . entitled to be given full faith and credit in the courts of this State” (GNOC Corp. v Cappelletti, 208 AD2d 498 ; see Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572, 577 , rearg denied 79 NY2d 916 , cert denied 506 US 823 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vertex Standard USA, Inc. v. Reichert
“Absent a jurisdictional challenge, a final judgment entered upon the defendants’] default in appearing in an action is . . . entitled to be given full faith and credit in the courts of this State” (GNOC Corp. v Cappel letti, 208 AD2d 498, 498 [1994]; see Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572, 577 [1991], rearg denied 79 NY2d 916 [1992], cert denied 506 US 823 [1992]; Ionescu v Brancoveanu, 246 AD2d 414, 416 [1998]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes River Watershed Conservancy v. Glickman
(2×)
See Sabine River Auth. v. United States Dep't of Interior, 951 F.2d 669 , 679 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 823 (1992); Roanoke River Basin Ass'n v. Hudson, 940 F.2d 58, 61 (4th Cir. 1991), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 1092 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes River Watershed Conservancy v. Glickman
See Sabine River Auth. v. United States Dep't of Interior, 951 F.2d 669 , 679 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 823 , 113 S.Ct. 75 , 121 L.Ed.2d 40 (1992); Roanoke River Basin Ass'n v. Hudson, 940 F.2d 58, 61 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1092 , 112 S.Ct. 1164 , 117 L.Ed.2d 411 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Park Country Club of Buffalo, Inc. v. Tower Insurance
A court may consider evidence submitted for the first time in reply papers where, as here, the opposing party had an opportunity to respond and submit papers in surreply (see Hoffman v Kessler, 28 AD3d 718 [2006]; see also Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 164 AD2d 737, 739 [1991], affd 78 NY2d 572 [1991], rearg denied 79 NY2d 916 [1992], cert denied 506 US 823 [1992]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ennis-Short v. Ostapeck
That affidavit provided further information to support plaintiffs’ position after the court requested that the parties submit affidavits from fact witnesses on a certain issue (cf. Russell v Trask Co., 125 AD2d 136, 138 [1987]; compare Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 164 AD2d 737, 739 [1991], affd 78 NY2d 572 [1991], cert denied 506 US 823 [1992]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mills v. Brown
Id.; See also Merrigan v. Affiliated Bank-shares of Colorado, Inc., 775 F.Supp. 1408 (D.Colo.1991), aff'd 956 F.2d 278 , 1992 WL 43491 , cert. den., 506 U.S. 823 , 113 S.Ct. 76 , 121 L.Ed.2d 40 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Staton Wholesale v. Barker
Hence, County Court did not err by giving full faith and credit to plaintiffs out-of-State judgment and by affirming the judgment in plaintiffs favor (see, US Const, art IV, § 1; see also, Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572 , cert denied 506 US 823 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Staton Wholesale v. Barker
Hence, County Court did not err by giving full faith and credit to plaintiffs out-of-State judgment and by affirming the judgment in plaintiffs favor (see, US Const, art IV, § 1; see also, Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572 , cert denied 506 US 823 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joyner v. Fillion
See also Lawrence v. Mars, Inc., 955 F.2d 902, 906 (4th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 823 , 113 S.Ct. 76 , 121 L.Ed.2d 40 (1992) (reaffirming the required elements of a prima facie case of retaliation set out in Ross, and that the sequence of proof laid out in McDonnelV-Douglas is applicable in retaliation cases under Title VII).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local No. 1 v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.
Inc., 870 F.2d 1085, 1089 (6th Cir.1989) (holding “where the [NLRB’s] resolution of non-contractual issues could also resolve the controversial breach of contract claims brought under § 301, the federal courts should decline to exercise jurisdiction over the contractual allegations”); See also Whitehouse & Sons Co. v. Local Union No, 118 of the Int'l Bhd. of Painters, Nos. 91-5307, 91-5867, 1992 WL 19472 (6th Cir. Feb. 5, 1992) (unreported), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 823 , 113 S.Ct. 76 , 121 L.Ed.2d 41 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gore, Inc. v. Espy
See also Lujan, 497 U.S. at 883, 112 S.Ct. at 3186 (emphasis in original) ("[T]he plaintiff must establish that the injury he complains of (his aggrievement, or the adverse effect upon him ) falls within the "zone of interests' sought to be protected by the statutory provisions whose violation forms the legal basis for his complaint."). 30 Sabine River Authority v. U.S. Dep't of Interior, 951 F.2d 669 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 823 , 113 S.Ct. 75 , 121 L.Ed.2d 40 (1992). 31 See Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 , 97 S.Ct. 451 , 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976) (foreclosure of a market constitutes an i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Whitehead
There are rare cases, other than those involving penal laws, in which the national policy of interstate comity has given way to paramount local interests resulting in a State’s refusal to recognize a foreign judgment (see, Williams v North Carolina, 325 US 226 ; see also, Alaska Packers Assn. v Industrial Acc. Commn., supra, p 546, and cases cited thereat).” (See also, Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572 , rearg denied 79 NY2d 916 , cert denied 506 US 823 .) Moreover, as discussed infra, in the text of this opinion, a finding of incompetency, diminished mental abilities, lack …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Weimer
v.
Amen
v.
Amen
No. 91-1920.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
506 U.S. 823
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.