Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis v. Jordan, 507 U.S. 916 (1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis v. Jordan, 507 U.S. 916 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 31 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: AT&T Universal Card Services v. Mercer (In re Mercer) (ca5, 2001-03-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" AT&T Universal Card Services v. Mercer (In re Mercer)
5th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See BancBoston Mortgage Corp. v. Ledford (In re Ledford), 127 B.R. 175, 178 (M.D.Tenn. 1991) ("critical issue is whether reliance on the representations was reasonable, not whether the decision to loan money was reasonable” (emphasis added)), aff'd, 970 F.2d 1556 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 916, 113 S.Ct. 1272 , 122 L.Ed.2d 667 (1993); Faulk, 69 B.R. at 749 (more stringent reasonable reliance standard does not authorize court to "second guess a creditor's decisions to make a loan or set loan policy for a creditor” or "to undertake a subjective evaluation and judgment of a credit…
cited Cited "see" Stevenson v. J.C. Bradford & Co. (In Re Cannon)
Bankr. W.D. Tenn. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jarrett v. Kassel, 972 F.2d 1415 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 916 , 113 S.Ct. 1272 , 122 L.Ed.2d 667 (1993); Vance v. Schulder, 547 S.W.2d 927 (Tenn.1977).
cited Cited "see" HSSM 7 Ltd. Partnership v. Bilzerian
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See BancBoston Mortgage Corp. v. Ledford (In re Ledford), 970 F.2d 1556 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 916 , 113 S.Ct. 1272 , 122 L.Ed.2d 667 (1993); Luce v. First Equip.
discussed Cited "see" In the Matter of Rodney Dale Coston and Billie Katherine Coston, Debtors. Rodney Dale Coston and Billie Katherine Coston v. Bank of Malvern
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Ledford, 970 F.2d 1556, 1560 (6th Cir.1992) (setting forth circumstances that may be considered in context of section 523(a)(2)(A) reasonableness of reliance determination), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1272 , 122 L.Ed.2d 667 (1993); see also In re Mullet, 817 F.2d 677, 679 (10th Cir.1987) (“[T]he reasonableness of a creditor’s reliance will be evaluated according to the particular facts and circumstances present in a given case.”).
discussed Cited "see" Coston v. Bank of Malvern (In Re Coston)
5th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Ledford, 970 F.2d 1556, 1560 (6th Cir.1992) (setting forth circumstances that may be considered in context of section 523(a)(2)(A) reasonableness of reliance determination), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1272 , 122 L.Ed.2d 667 (1993); see also In re Mullet, 817 F.2d 677, 679 (10th Cir.1987) (“[T]he reasonableness of a creditor’s reliance will be evaluated according to the particular facts and circumstances present in a given case.”).
discussed Cited "see" Matter Of: CONSTANCE P. MERCER, Debtor, AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES v. CONSTANCE P. MERCER
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See BancBoston Mortgage Corp. v. Ledford (In re Ledford), 127 B.R. 175, 178 (M.D.Tenn. 1991) ("critical issue is whether reliance on the representations was reasonable, not whether the decision to loan money was reasonable” (emphasis added)), aff'd, 970 F.2d 1556 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 916 , 113 S.Ct. 1272 , 122 L.Ed.2d 667 (1993); Faulk, 69 B.R. at 749 (more stringent reasonable reliance standard does not authorize court to "second guess a creditor’s decisions to make a loan or set loan policy for a creditor” or "to undertake a subjective evaluation and judgment of a cre…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stuart v. Stuart
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Id., 888; annot., 58 A.L.R.4th, supra, pp. 84-85 (Sup. 2009); see, e.g., Jordan v. Clayton Brokerage Co., 975 F.2d 539, 541 (8th Cir. 1992) (applying Missouri law), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 916 , 113 S. Ct. 1272 , 122 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Insouth Bank v. Michael (In Re Michael)
Bankr. W.D. Tenn. · 2001 · signal: compare · confidence low
N.D.Ind.1989); In re Jackson, 32 B.R. 549, 552 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1983); In re Branham, 126 B.R. 283, 292 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1991) (accepting the proposition that a creditor may have a duty to inquire further into a financial statement with glaring inconsistencies or patent defects if its reliance is to be deemed reasonable); compare In re Ledford, 970 F.2d 1556 (6th.Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 916 , 113 S.Ct. 1272 , 122 L.Ed.2d 667 (1993) (refusing to articulate a wholesale rejection of the duty on the creditor to investigate because the specific circumstances of the case involved a debt- or wh…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis, Inc.
v.
Jordan
No. 92-1054.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1993.
507 U.S. 916
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.