green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Randall Kling v. Louisiana Department of Revenue
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So. 2d 1257, 1261 ( La. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S. Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 1994).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Odom v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HOSP.
In its landmark case pertinent to this issue, the supreme court in Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260 (La.1993); cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 *100 (1994) specified the role of a reviewing court as follows: [T]he role of an appellate court in reviewing general damages is not to decide what it considers to be an appropriate award, but rather to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.
cited
Cited "see"
Rentrop v. Arch Ins. Co.
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. , 623 So.2d 1257 , 1261 (La. 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Lopez v. Cosey
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1261 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
South Lafourche Levee District v. Jarreau
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Batiste v. City of Baton Rouge
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1261 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Ferrer v. Harwood
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260-1261 (La. 1993), cert.denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Cavalier v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Pino v. Gauthier, 633 So.2d at 656 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cavalier v. STATE, EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV.
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Pino v. Gauthier, 633 So.2d at 656 .
cited
Cited "see"
Bouquet v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1261 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Earls v. McDowell
See, Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Denton v. Vidrine
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260-1261 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Denton v. Vidrine
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260-1261 (La. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Fowler v. Bossano
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Fox v. Texaco, Inc.
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1261 (La.1993), cert denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Konneker v. Sewerage & Water Bd.
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Bituminous Materials, Inc. v. Rice County, Minnesota
See Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 577 (8th Cir.1993), cert. *1072 denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
The Corner Pocket of Sioux Falls, Inc. v. Video Lottery Technologies, Inc.
See Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 998 F.2d 575, 578-79 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); City of Mt.
cited
Cited "see"
Southern Siding Co. v. Raymond
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Masepohl v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.
See Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Howell v. American Cas. Co. of Reading
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert. denied, Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Youn, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Theriot v. Allstate Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Barnco Intern., Inc. v. Arkla, Inc.
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Martinez v. Bennett
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1260-61 (La.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d 498, 501 (La.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Daigle v. US Fidelity and Guar. Ins. Co.
See Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257, 1261 (La.1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Complaint of Port Arthur Towing Co. on Behalf of M/V Miss Carolyn
See Cupit v. McClanahan Contractors, Inc., 1 F.3d 346, 348 (5th Cir.1993) ("Once an injured seaman has established that his employer’s negligence caused his injuries, a vessel owner seeking limitation of liability must prove that it lacked privity or knowledge of the negligence.” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Brister, 946 F.2d at 355 ("In a limitation proceeding, once an injured seaman establishes that negligence or unseaworthiness caused his injuries, the burden shifts to the vessel owner...." (emphasis added)); see, e.g., In re Lloyd�…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Broussard v. Stolt Offshore, Inc.
Additionally, a corporate shipowner “may be deemed to have constructive knowledge if the unseaworthy or negligent condition could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence.” Brister, 946 F.2d at 356 ; see also Cupit v. McClanahan Contractors, Inc., 1 F.3d 346, 348 (5th Cir.1993) (“ ‘Privity or knowledge,’ sometimes described as ‘complicity in the fault,’ extends beyond actual knowledge to knowledge that the ship owner would have obtained by reasonable investigation.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 *676 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burgard v. Allstate Ins. Co.
See also, Aguillard v. Meiners, 03-311 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/16/03) , 857 So.2d 1034 , writ denied, 2003-2891 (La.1/9/04), 862 So.2d 987 [3] Trunk v. Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/19/04), 885 So.2d 534 . [4] Baudier v. Cheron, 04-5 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/26/04), 876 So.2d 165 (citing Theriot v. Allstate, 625 So.2d 1337 (La.1993)). [5] Coscino v. Wolfley, 96-0702 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/4/97) , 696 So.2d 257 , writ denied, 97-C-2317 (La.1/9/98), 705 So.2d 1100 , and writ denied, 97-2539 (La.1/9/98), 705 So.2d 1102 . [6] Id. [7] Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc.
See also Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. et al., 623 So.2d 1257, 1261 (La.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adler v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), *940 cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc., 222 Neb. 333 , 383 N.W.2d 758, 763 (1986) (stating that plaintiff must prove existence of agreement between two or more persons to inflict an injury upon or wrong against another).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc., 222 Neb. 333 , 383 N.W.2d 758, 763 (1986) (stating that plaintiff must prove existence of agreement between two or more persons to inflict an injury upon or wrong against another). 58 Plaintiffs have not presented evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact on their civil conspiracy claim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc., 222 Neb. 333 , 383 N.W.2d 758, 763 (1986) (stating that plaintiff must prove existence of agreement between two or more persons to inflict an injury upon or wrong against another).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
1997-1 Trade Cases P 71,721, 10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 710 Florida Seed Company, Inc., a Corporation, Frit Industries, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants v. Monsanto Company, a Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee
See, e.g., Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 975 F.2d 518 (8th Cir.1992), rev'd in part, 998 F.2d 575 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc., 752 F.2d 445, 450 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3481 , 87 L.Ed.2d 616 (1985); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 710 (11th Cir.1984); Harris v. Shell Oil Co., 371 F.Supp. 376, 377 (M.D.Ala.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Florida Seed Co. v. Monsanto Co.
See, e.g., Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 975 F.2d 518 (8th Cir.1992), rev’d, in part, 998 F.2d 575 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc., 752 F.2d 445, 450 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3481 , 87 L.Ed.2d 616 (1985); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 710 (11th Cir.1984); Harris v. Shell Oil Co., 371 F.Supp. 376, 377 (M.D.Ala.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wmx Technologies, Inc. v. Gasconade County
As an illustration of a "truly irrational" ordinance, the Chesterfield court described it as one "applying only to persons whose names begin with a letter in the first half of the alphabet." Chesterfield, 963 F.2d at 1104 ; See also Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994)(applying "truly irrational" standard to federal substantive due process claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Gasconade County
As an illustration of a "truly irrational" ordinance, the Chesterfield court described it as one "applying only to persons whose names begin with a letter in the ~`lrst half of the alphabet." Chesterfield, 963 F.2d at 1104 ; See also Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994)(applying "truly irrational" standard to federal substantive due process claim).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Roy v. City of Little Rock
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 577 (8th Cir.1993) (recognizing such a claim), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Chesterfield Dev.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beverage Corp. v. Honickman
See, e.g., Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 975 F.2d 518, 521 (8th Cir.1992) (denying antitrust standing to sole shareholder where only alleged injury stemmed from failure of corporation), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Sharp v. United Airlines, Inc., 967 F.2d 404, 407-08 (10th Cir.) (denying antitrust standing to employees where only alleged injury stemmed from failure of corporation), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 464 , 121 L.Ed.2d 372 (1992). 21 If Seven-Up Brooklyn, before its bankruptcy, had cancelled its distribution agreements and hired del…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
G.K.A. Beverage Corp. v. Honickman
See, e.g., Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 975 F.2d 518, 521 (8th Cir.1992) (deny ing antitrust standing to sole shareholder where only alleged injury stemmed from failure of corporation), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Sharp v. United Airlines, Inc., 967 F.2d 404, 407-08 (10th Cir.) (denying antitrust standing to employees where only alleged injury stemmed from failure of corporation), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 464 , 121 L.Ed.2d 372 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas Nelson, Inc.
v.
Harper House, Inc
v.
Harper House, Inc
93-916.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1994.
Published
Thomas Nelson, Inc., et al.
v.
Harper House, Inc.
No. 93-916.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 22, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 5 F. 3d 536.