green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Plainview Texas, William Mull, in His Official Capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Plainview Police Department, and Ken Coughlin, Capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Plainview Police Department v. Korey Ferguson
See City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., Inc., Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 473 U.S. 432, 440 , 105 S.Ct. 3249 , 3254–55, 87 L.Ed.2d 313 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 834 (1985); Clajon Production Corp. v. Petera, 70 F.3d 1566 , F.2d 1488, 1501 (9th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 857 1580 (10th Cir.1995); see also City of New Orleans v. Dukes, F.2d 567 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1090 , 109 427 U.S. 297 , 303–04, 96 S.Ct. 2513 , 2516–17, 49 L.Ed.2d S. Ct. 1557, 103 L.Ed.2d 860 (1989). 511 (1976); Barshop v. Medina …
discussed
Cited "see"
Cain v. Ryan
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 162 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Rosser v. Chrysler Corp., 864 F.2d 1299, 1304 (7th Cir.1988). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
ca11 1998
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd's, 3 F.3d 156, 162 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lipcon v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
(2×)
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 162 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richards v. Lloyd's of London
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 160-61 (7th Cir.1993) (expressing “serious concerns” that the choice clauses offend public policy but ultimately ruling in Lloyd’s favor), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Roby v. Corporation of Lloyd’s, 996 F.2d 1353, 1364-66 (2nd Cir.) (substantially the same), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 945 , 114 S.Ct. 385 , 126 L.Ed.2d 333 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1998
See Bonny v. Society of Lloyd's, 3 F.3d 156, 160-61 (7th Cir.1993) (expressing "serious concerns" that the choice clauses offend public policy but ultimately ruling in Lloyd's favor), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Roby v. Corporation of Lloyd's, 996 F.2d 1353, 1364-66 (2nd Cir.) (substantially the same), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 945 , 114 S.Ct. 385 , 126 L.Ed.2d 333 (1993). 27 We follow our six sister circuits that have ruled to enforce the choice clauses.
cited
Cited "see"
Bituminous Materials v. Rice County, MN
See Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 577 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Bituminous Materials, Inc. v. Rice County, Minnesota
See Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 577 (8th Cir.1993), cert. *1072 denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
The Corner Pocket of Sioux Falls, Inc. v. Video Lottery Technologies, Inc.
See Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 998 F.2d 575, 578-79 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); City of Mt.
cited
Cited "see"
Corner Pocket v. Video Lottery
See -3- Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 998 F.2d 575, 578-79 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 (1994); City of Mt.
cited
Cited "see"
Masepohl v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.
See Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tufts v. Corporation of Lloyd's
Accord Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156 , 160 n. 10 (7th Cir.1993) (“Nothing excuses the plaintiffs for not being aware of the substantive provisions of English law that the forum selection clause incorporates into their agreement.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); West, Tr. at 132 (finding nothing “would justify failure to read this one-and-a-half-page document which in itself is quite simple”); see also Castro v. Marine Midland Bank, 695 F.Supp. 1548, 1551 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (rejecting claim that arbitration clause was induced by fraud whe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melia v. Zenhire, Inc.
See, e.g., Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 160-161 (7th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 (1994) (Federal securities laws); Wimsatt v. Beverly Hills Weight Loss Clinics Int’l, Inc., 32 Cal. App. 4th 1511, 1520-1521 (1995) (State franchise investment law). “ ‘Public policy’ in this context refers to a court’s conviction, grounded in legislation and precedent, that denying enforcement of a contractual term is necessary to protect some aspect of the public welfare.” Beacon Hill Civic Ass’n v. Ristorante Toscano, Inc., 422 Mass. 318, 321 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Broussard v. Stolt Offshore, Inc.
Additionally, a corporate shipowner “may be deemed to have constructive knowledge if the unseaworthy or negligent condition could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence.” Brister, 946 F.2d at 356 ; see also Cupit v. McClanahan Contractors, Inc., 1 F.3d 346, 348 (5th Cir.1993) (“ ‘Privity or knowledge,’ sometimes described as ‘complicity in the fault,’ extends beyond actual knowledge to knowledge that the ship owner would have obtained by reasonable investigation.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 *676 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adler v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), *940 cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc., 222 Neb. 333 , 383 N.W.2d 758, 763 (1986) (stating that plaintiff must prove existence of agreement between two or more persons to inflict an injury upon or wrong against another).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
See, e.g., Schulmerich Carillons, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 154 Pa.Cmwlth. 343 , 623 A.2d 921 , appeal denied, 535 Pa. 642 , 631 A.2d 1013 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc., 222 Neb. 333 , 383 N.W.2d 758, 763 (1986) (stating that plaintiff must prove existence of agreement between two or more persons to inflict an injury upon or wrong against another).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.
See, e.g., Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574, 578 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994); Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc., 222 Neb. 333 , 383 N.W.2d 758, 763 (1986) (stating that plaintiff must prove existence of agreement between two or more persons to inflict an injury upon or wrong against another). 58 Plaintiffs have not presented evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact on their civil conspiracy claim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Florida Seed Co. v. Monsanto Co.
See, e.g., Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 975 F.2d 518 (8th Cir.1992), rev’d, in part, 998 F.2d 575 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc., 752 F.2d 445, 450 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3481 , 87 L.Ed.2d 616 (1985); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 710 (11th Cir.1984); Harris v. Shell Oil Co., 371 F.Supp. 376, 377 (M.D.Ala.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca11 1997
See, e.g., Lovett v. General Motors Corp., 975 F.2d 518 (8th Cir.1992), rev'd in part, 998 F.2d 575 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1058 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 849 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986); Bubar v. Ampco Foods, Inc., 752 F.2d 445, 450 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018 , 105 S.Ct. 3481 , 87 L.Ed.2d 616 (1985); Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 710 (11th Cir.1984); Harris v. Shell Oil Co., 371 F.Supp. 376, 377 (M.D.Ala.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Gasconade County
As an illustration of a "truly irrational" ordinance, the Chesterfield court described it as one "applying only to persons whose names begin with a letter in the ~`lrst half of the alphabet." Chesterfield, 963 F.2d at 1104 ; See also Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994)(applying "truly irrational" standard to federal substantive due process claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wmx Technologies, Inc. v. Gasconade County
As an illustration of a "truly irrational" ordinance, the Chesterfield court described it as one "applying only to persons whose names begin with a letter in the first half of the alphabet." Chesterfield, 963 F.2d at 1104 ; See also Anderson v. Douglas County, 4 F.3d 574 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994)(applying "truly irrational" standard to federal substantive due process claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ashenden v. Lloyd's of London
See, e.g., Bonny v. Society of Lloyd’s, 3 F.3d 156, 158-62 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1113 , 114 S.Ct. 1057 , 127 L.Ed.2d 378 (1994); Roby v. Corporation of Lloyd’s, 996 F.2d 1353, 1362-63 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 945 , 114 S.Ct. 385 , 126 L.Ed.2d 333 (1993).
Anderson
v.
Douglas County, Minnesota
v.
Douglas County, Minnesota
93-923.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1994.
Published
Anderson
v.
Douglas County, Minnesota, et al.
No. 93-923.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 22, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 8th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 4 F. 3d 574.