green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.0 score
“valid statistical evidence may play a helpful role even in disparate treatment cases, but only if it tends to prove the discriminatory intent of the decision makers involved. that often will be difficult.”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ryan v. Greater Lawrence Technical School
valid statistical evidence may play a helpful role even in disparate treatment cases, but only if it tends to prove the discriminatory intent of the decision makers involved. that often will be difficult.
discussed
Cited "see"
Collazo v. Condado Plaza Hotel
See Le Blanc v. Great American Insurance, 6 F.3d 836, 841 (1st Cir.1993) cert. denied — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1398 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994); Richard A. Mottolo and Service Pumping and Drain Co., Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., et al., 43 F.3d 723 (1st Cir.1995); Lydia Libertad, et. al. v. Patrick Welch, et. al., 53 F.3d 428 (1st Cir.1995); Rossy v. Roche Products, Inc., 880 F.2d 621, 624 (1st Cir. 1989); John & Kostas Service Station, Inc. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc., 948 F.2d 821 (1st Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Reinforced Earth, Co.
See LeBlanc v. Great American Insurance, 6 F.3d 836, 841 (1st Cir.1993) cert. denied — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1398 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994); Richard A Mottolo and Service Pumping and Drain Co., Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., et. al., 43 F.3d 723, 725 (1st Cir., 1995); Lydia Libertad, et. al. v. Patrick, Welch, et. al., 53 F.3d 428 (1st Cir.1995). 1 “Once a properly documented motion has engaged the gears of Rule 56, the party to whom the motion is directed can shut down the machinery only by showing that a trial worthy issue exists.” See Eileen M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. American Airlines, Inc.
See Le Blanc v. Great American Insurance, 6 F.3d 836, 841 (1st Cir.1993) cert. denied—U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1398 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994); Richard A. Mottolo and Service Pumping and Drain Co., Inc. v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., et al., 43 F.3d 723, 724 (1st Cir.1995); John P. Coyne et al v. Taber Partners I, 53 F.3d 454 (1st Cir.1995); Lydia Libertad et al. v. Father Patrick Welch et al., 53 F.3d 428 (1st Cir.1995); Rossy v. Roche Products, Inc. 880 F.2d 621, 624 (1st Cir.1989); John & Rostas Service Station, Inc. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc., 948 F.2d 821 (1st Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jorge Rivera Surillo & Co. v. Cerro Copper Products Co.
See Le Blanc v. Great American Insurance, 6 F.3d 836, 841 (1st Cir.1993) cert. denied — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1398 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994); Mottolo v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., 43 F.3d 723, 725 (1st Cir.1995); Lydia Libertad, et al. v. Patrick Welch, et al., 53 F.3d 428 (1st Cir.1995); Rossy v. Roche Products, Inc., 880 F.2d 621, 624 (1st Cir.1989); John & Kostas Service Station, Inc. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc., 948 F.2d 821 (1st Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Waldron v. SL Industries, Inc.
See LeBlanc v. Great American Insurance Co., 6 F.3d 836 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1398 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994); Saulpaugh v. Monroe Community Hosp., 4 F.3d 134 (2d Cir.1993); Bodenheimer v. PPG Industries, Inc., 5 F.3d 955, 957 (5th Cir.1993); Durham v. Xerox Corp., 18 F.3d 836 (10th Cir.1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dao v. Knightsbridge International Reinsurance Corp.
See, e.g., Sundance Cruises Corp. v. American Bur. of Shipping, 7 F.3d 1077, 1081 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1399 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Maxine GRADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AFFILIATED CENTRAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See, e.g., LeBlanc v. Great American Insurance Co., 6 F.3d 836, 847 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1398 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994); Lowe v. J.B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Farrell Lines Inc. v. Columbus Cello-Poly Corp.
“A federal court sitting in admiralty must apply federal choice of law rules.” State Trading Corp. of India v. As suranceforeningen Skuld, 921 F.2d 409, 414 (2d Cir.1990); see also Sundance Cruises Corp. v. American Bureau of Shipping, 7 F.3d 1077, 1080 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1018 , 114 S.Ct. 1399 , 128 L.Ed.2d 72 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sundance Cruises Corp.
v.
American Bureau of Shipping
v.
American Bureau of Shipping
No. 93-1299.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.