green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2006 · 2 courts ·
…under massachusetts law, a court will declare a party a constructive trustee of property for the benefit of another if he acquired the property through fraud, mistake, breach of duty, or in other circumstances indicating that he would be unjustly enriched
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Maffei v. Roman Catholic Archbishop
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
to inquire into an alleged promise by the bishop to keep a parish open or refrain from merging it with another parish was an impermissible intrusion into the bishop's ecclesiastical authority
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Abbott v. Arthur Mackenzie Productions, Inc.
under massachusetts law, a court will declare a party a constructive trustee of property for the benefit of another if he acquired the property through fraud, mistake, breach of duty, or in other circumstances indicating that he would be unjustly enriched
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stevens v. Nagel
under massachusetts law, a court will declare a party a constructive trustee of property for the benefit of another if he acquired the property through fraud, mistake, breach of duty, or in other circumstances indicating that he would be unjustly enriched
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Ward
We are also mindful of recent holdings in other areas of the law that suggest that a “federal judge cannot [and should not] punish the prosecutor at the expense of the law-abiding public.” United States v. Van Engel, 15 F.3d 623, 632 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 5.Ct. 2163, 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Genesis Technical & Financial, Inc. v. Cast Navigation, LLC
See Foster v. Hurley, 444 Mass. 157, 167 (2005) (“Under Massachusetts law, a court will declare a party a constructive trustee of property for the benefit of another if he acquired the property through fraud, mistake, breach of duty, or in other circumstances indicating that he would be unjustly enriched”), quoting from Fortin v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester, 416 Mass. 781, 789 , cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1142 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Sutton v. Valois
See Fortin v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester, 416 Mass. 781, 789-790 , cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1142 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Nile v. Nile
See Fortin v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Worcester, 416 Mass. 781, 789 , cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1142 (1994); Click v. Greenleaf, 383 Mass. 290 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
1998-1 Trade Cases P 72,187, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4831, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6824 Rebel Oil Company, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, and Auto Flite Oil Company, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. Atlantic Richfield Company
(2×)
Average cost is thus higher than average variable cost for all output levels. 26 Id. at 1384-85; see Vollrath Co. v. Sammi Corp., 9 F.3d 1455, 1461 (9th Cir.1993) (plaintiff used average variable cost to argue that prices were predatory), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1142 , 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994); 3 P. Areeda & H.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rebel Oil Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
(2×)
Id. at 1384-85; see Vollrath Co. v. Sammi Corp., 9 F.3d 1455, 1461 (9th Cir.1993) (plaintiff used average variable cost to argue that prices were predatory), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1142 , 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994); 3 P. Areeda & H.
examined
Cited "see"
Crowe v. Wiltel Communications Systems
(3×)
See Vollrath Co. v. Sammi Corp., 9 F.3d 1455, 1460 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1142 , 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crowe v. Wiltel Communications Systems
(2×)
See Vollrath Co. v. Sammi Corp., 9 F.3d 1455, 1460 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See United States v. Boyd, 55 F.3d 239, 241 (7th Cir.1995), and United States v. Engel, 15 F.3d 623, 631 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Metro Industries, Inc. v. Sammi Corp.
See — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
1996-1 Trade Cases P 71,383, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2946, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4883 Metro Industries, Inc. v. Sammi Corporation, Sammi (America) Corporation Ken Carter Industries, Inc.
See --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994). 11 Meanwhile, the defendants in the Metro case filed motions for summary judgment in 1990 after the district court's JNOV but before this court considered Vollrath's appeal.
cited
Cited "see"
Branko Sindicich v. \M Highway\""
See Vollrath Co. v. Sammi Corp., 9 F.3d 1455, 1460 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Franconia Associates v. United States
(2×)
See also Parkridge Investors Ltd. v. Farmers Home Administration, 13 F.3d 1192 , 1198 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1142 , 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994) (an exemption from future regulations does not exempt a contract from future acts of Congress).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marius Canoy
Under our other line of cases, however, it is the defendant’s burden to show in addition to actual and substantial prejudice that “the government delayed the indictment for tactical advantage or some other impermissible reason.” Anag-nostou, 974 F.2d at 941 ; Roller, 956 F.2d at 1415 ; see also United States v. Van Engel, 15 F.3d 623, 630 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2163 , 128 L.Ed.2d 886 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Methodist Hospital
v.
Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services
v.
Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. 93-1449.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 1994.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.