green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 10×
9.4 score
G Cite
cited 8× by 8 distinct cases, last quoted 2002 ·
…in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Resource Recycling Corp. v. United States
n establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits' and deposition testimony
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
First Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sierra Pacific Resources & Subsidiaries v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Scarseth v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Frymire v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may-review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Spodek v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Heim v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Doninger Metal Products, Corp. v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Golding v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hannon v. United States
in establishing predicate jurisdictional facts, a court is not restricted to the face of the pleadings, but may review evidence extrinsic to the pleadings, including affidavits and deposition testimony.
cited
Cited "see"
Milecrest Corp. v. United States
The former is a “facial” attack on the pleading and the latter is a "factual” attack on the existence of jurisdiction; See id.
cited
Cited "see"
Air Liquide America Corp. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
See United Texas Transmission Co. (UTTCO) v. United States Army Corps of Eng’eers, 7 F.3d 436 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1235 , 114 S.Ct. 2738 , 129 L.Ed.2d 859 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heard v. Johnson
Accord Cedars-Sinai Medical Ctr. v. Watkins, 11 F.3d 1573 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1235 , 114 S.Ct. 2738 , 129 L.Ed.2d 859 (1994); Thornhill Publishing Co. v. General Tel. & Electronics Corp., 594 F.2d 730 , 733 (9th Cir.1979); McLain v. Real Estate Bd., Inc., 583 F.2d 1315 , 1318 n. 1 (5th Cir.1978), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 444 U.S. 232 , 100 S.Ct. 502 , 62 L.Ed.2d 441 (1980); Mortensen v. First Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Hamza v. United States
See Cedars-Sinai Medical Ctr. v. Watkins, 11 F.3d 1573 , 1583 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2738 , 129 L.Ed.2d 859 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. American Petrofina Pipeline Co.
See United Texas Transmission Company v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 7 F.3d 436, 441 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2738 , 129 L.Ed.2d 859 (1994) (UTTCO). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lambert
Co., 339 U.S. 799, 805 , 70 S.Ct. 885, 888-89 , 94 L.Ed. 1277 (1950); Miller v. United States, 583 F.2d 857, 862 (6th Cir.1978); see also United Texas Transmission Co. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 7 F.3d 436, 440 (5th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2738 , 129 L.Ed.2d 859 (1994) (fastland is the land outside the original stream banks). 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
v.
O'Leary, Secretary of Energy
v.
O'Leary, Secretary of Energy
No. 93-1450.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1994.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (10)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.