Mendo Wood Prods., Inc. v. Mulder, 379 U.S. 844 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Mendo Wood Prods., Inc. v. Mulder, 379 U.S. 844 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“it is improper to utilize a grand jury for the sole or dominating purpose of preparing an already pending indictment for trial.”
179 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 40 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Furrow (cacd, 2000-09-19) · Strongest negative: George T. C. Lollar v. United States (cadc, 1967-05-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" George T. C. Lollar v. United States (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1967 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. United States v. Dardi, 2 Cir., 330 F.2d 316, 335 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Furrow
C.D. Cal. · 2000 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
it is improper to utilize a grand jury for the sole or dominating purpose of preparing an already pending indictment for trial.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Santoro
E.D.N.Y · 1986 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
t is not a legitimate function of the grand jury to serve as a substitute for pretrial discovery.
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re Estate of Overton
Minn. Ct. App. · 1988 · confidence medium
Id. at 182-83, 126 N.W.2d at 154-55 (footnote omitted).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.
Minn. · 1980 · confidence medium
Id. at 182-83, 126 N.W.2d at 154-55 (footnotes omitted).
cited Cited "see" In re Eight Grand Jury Subpoenae Duces Tecum
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon John Doe, Esq. Richard Roe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United States (2×)
2d Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 51 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Doubleday & Co., Inc. v. Rogers (2×)
Tex. · 1984 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Loftsgaarden v. Reiling, 267 Minn. 181 , 126 N.W.2d 154 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 31 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); Toomey v. Farley, 2 N.Y.2d 71 , 156 N.Y.S.2d 840 , 138 N.E.2d 221 (1956); Kent v. City of Buffalo, 61 Misc.2d 142 , 304 N.Y.S.2d 949 (Sup.Ct.Erie County 1969), rev’d on other grounds, 29 N.Y.2d 818 , 327 N.Y.S.2d 653 , 277 N.E.2d 669 (1971).
cited Cited "see" Field v. Omaha Standard, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wirtz v. International Harvester Co., 331 F.2d 462, 465 (5th Cir.1964), cert. den., 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 36 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. David Guillette and Robert Joost
2d Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases) (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 332-333 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Crosby, 294 F.2d 928, 948-950 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 984 , 82 S.Ct. 599 , 7 L.Ed.2d 523 (1962).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Robert Edwards, Max Jakob, John J. Lombardozzi and Milton Parness
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 330 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Kahaner, supra, 317 F.2d at 476 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. William Bentvena, William Struzzieri and Samuel Monastersky
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
examined Cited "see" United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. Shuck (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dardi, 2 Cir., 1964, 330 F.2d 316, 330, 332 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 ; United States v. Crosby, 2 Cir., 1961, 294 F.2d 928, 943-944 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Idlibi v. Hartford Courant Co. (Dissent)
Conn. · 2024 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Cepeda v. Cowles Magazines & Broadcasting, Inc., 328 F.2d 869 , 870–71 (9th Cir.) (concluding that jury reasonably could find that magazine article and photograph showing plaintiff baseball player ‘‘being banned by the umpire from a game because he had made a violent gesture . . . at being called out at first base’’ was defamatory when it was disputed whether plaintiff was ‘‘temperamental, uncooperative and under- productive’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 844 , 85 S. Ct. 51 , 13 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Idlibi v. Hartford Courant Co. (Dissent)
Conn. · 2024 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Cepeda v. Cowles Magazines & Broadcasting, Inc., 328 F.2d 869 , 870–71 (9th Cir.) (concluding that jury reasonably could find that magazine article and photograph showing plaintiff baseball player ‘‘being banned by the umpire from a game because he had made a violent gesture . . . at being called out at first base’’ was defamatory when it was disputed whether plaintiff was ‘‘temperamental, uncooperative and under- productive’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 844 , 85 S. Ct. 51 , 13 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Salt Lake City v. Grotepas
Utah · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Brinson v. Florida, 273 F.Supp. 840, 846-47 (S.D.Fla.1967); see also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 335 (2d Cir.) (holding that exercise of right to counsel must be subject to necessities of sound judicial administration), cer t. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 51, 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); accord Creighton v. North Carolina, 257 F.Supp. 806, 809 (E.D.N.C.1966) (same).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Interstate Printing Co. v. Department of Revenue
Neb. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Mulder v. Mendo Wood Products, Inc., 225 Cal. App. 2d 619 , 37 Cal. Rptr. 479 (1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 844 , 85 S. Ct. 85 , 13 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Stacey v. Charles Rogers, Inc.
6th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Wirtz v. International Harvester Co., 331 F.2d 462, 466 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 36 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Stacey v. Charles J. Rogers, Inc.
6th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Wirtz v. International Harvester Co., 331 F.2d 462, 466 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 36 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Penfield v. Venuti
D. Conn. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir.) (“[w]hile an arrest alone is not normally admissible to impair the credibility of a witness, the fact that it may embitter him so as to motivate him to testify as he has may be relevant”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Vincent Moran Doss (2×)
6th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964), and Application of Iaconi, 120 F.Supp. 589, 591 (D.Mass.1954).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Crotty Brothers Dallas, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Wirtz v. International Harvester Company, 331 F.2d 462, 465 (5th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 36 ,. 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964) ; Mitchell v. City Ice Company, Inc., 273 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1960). 30 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. John Mingoia and Herbert Richman
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 323-333 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Crosby, 294 F.2d 928, 948-950 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Peter Castellana
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Agueci, 310 F.2d 817 , 99 A.L.R.2d 478 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 959 , 83 S.Ct. 1013 , 10 L.Ed.2d 11 (1963); United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 361 U.S. 863 , 80 S.Ct. 119 , 4 L.Ed.2d 102 (1959). 23 A. Although citing no explicit statutory or case authority to support their position, Joseph Weinberg and David Newman advance the technical claim that their admissions were privileged under Section 7, sub. a(10) of the Ba…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Castellana
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Agueci, 310 F.2d 817 , 99 A.L.R.2d 478 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 959 , 83 S.Ct. 1013 , 10 L.Ed.2d 11 (1963); United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 361 U.S. 863 , 80 S.Ct. 119 , 4 L.Ed.2d 102 (1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mendo Wood Products, Inc.
v.
Mulder
No. 394.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
379 U.S. 844
John T. Casey and James F. Kemp for petitioner. David L. Luce for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: C.D. California (1) · E.D. New York (1)

District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District. Certiorari denied.