Croft-Mullins Elec. Co. v. United States, 379 U.S. 968 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Croft-Mullins Elec. Co. v. United States, 379 U.S. 968 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: The United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation and Sandia Corporation, a New Mexico Corporation, D/B/A Sandia National Laboratories, United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- the United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Fred Sanchez Construction Company v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants (ca10, 1987-11-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" The United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation and Sandia Corporation, a New Mexico Corporation, D/B/A Sandia National Laboratories, United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Hugg Surveying Co., Plaintiff v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- the United States of America, for the Use of C.J.C., Inc., a New Mexico Corporation v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants- United States of America, for the Use of Fred Sanchez Construction Company v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc., a New Mexico Corporation and Commercial Union Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendants
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Continental Casualty Co. v. Allsop Lumber Co., 336 F.2d 445, 455-56 (8th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 662 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 (1965) 20 Western argues that no payment was due during August for work performed in July because CJC was late submitting the invoices.
cited Cited "see" United States ex rel. C.J.C., Inc. v. Western States Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Continental Casualty Co. v. Allsop Lumber Co., 336 F.2d 445, 455-56 (8th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 662 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 (1965). .
discussed Cited "see" Bestway Equipment Services, Inc. v. Berwind Lines, Inc., Third Party v. Caribe Tug Corporation, Third Party
1st Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Croft-Mullins Electric Co., 333 F.2d 772 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 (1965) (appellate court may properly find that prior or contemporaneous oral conversations and negotiations, though admitted without objection in a judge-tried case, are simply immaterial and irrelevant to the question of what the agreement was); 4 Williston on Contracts § 631 (3d ed. 1961).
discussed Cited "see" Linus Pauling v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Company, a Corporation
8th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pauling v. News Syndicate Co., 335 F.2d 659, 671 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 662 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 ; Gilberg v. Goffi, 21 App.Div.2d 517, 251 N.Y.S.2d 823 (Sup. 1964), aff’d 15 N.Y.2d 1023 , 260 N.Y.S. 2d 29 , 207 N.E.2d 620 (1965); Clark v. Allen, 415 Pa. 484 , 204 A.2d 42, 44 (1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Slagle-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Landis Const. Co.
La. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Continental Casualty Co. v. Allsop Lumber Co., 336 F.2d 445 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 662 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 (1964); United States v. Endebrock-White Co., Inc., 275 F.2d 57 (4th Cir. 1960); United States v. Fire Association of Philadelphia, 260 F.2d 541 (2d Cir. 1958); Fourt v. United States, 235 F.2d 433 (10th Cir. 1956); Glassell-Taylor Co. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 153 F.2d 527 (5th Cir. 1946); United States v. Continental Casualty Co., 224 F.Supp. 857 (D.C.Pa.1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Elmer Patrick Sharpe
1st Cir. · 1971 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See 6 Wigmore, Evidence §§ 1766, 1790 (3d ed. 1940); see, e. g., Pauling v. News Syndicate Co., 335 F.2d 659, 664 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 662 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 (1965) ; Scholle v. Cuban-Venezuelan Oil Voting Trust, 285 F.2d 318, 321 (2d Cir. 1960); United States v. Mesarosh, 223 F.2d 449, 454 (3d Cir. 1955), rev’d on other grounds, 352 U.S. 1 , 77 S.Ct. 1 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1 (1956).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Heyward-Robinson Company
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Pauling v. News Syndicate Company, Inc., 335 F.2d 659, 668-671 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 662 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 (1965); LiMandri v. Brasileiro, 316 F.2d 3 (2d Cir. 1963); Alexander v. Kramer Bros.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States ex rel. D'Agostino Excavators, Inc. v. Heyward-Robinson Co.
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Pauling v. News Syndicate Company, Inc., 335 F.2d 659, 668-671 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 662 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 (1965); LiMandri v. Brasileiro, 316 F.2d 3 (2d Cir. 1963); Alexander v. Kramer Bros.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Croft-Mullins Electric Co., Inc.
v.
United States
No. 642.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
379 U.S. 968
Jesse■ W. Bush for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Alan S. Rosenthal and Robert Y. Zener for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.