green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Armstrong v. Squadrito
But see Riley v. Camp, 130 F.3d 958 , 964 & n. 10 (11th Cir.1997) (explaining the Eleventh Circuit's position that "the Rochin standard has no place in a civil case for money damages," McKinney v. Pate, 20 F.3d 1550 , 1556 n. 7 (11th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 898 , 130 L.Ed.2d 783 (1995)), cert. denied, - U.S. - 118 S.Ct. 2296 , 141 L.Ed.2d 157 (1998). .
discussed
Cited "but see"
Armstrong v. Squadrito
But see Riley v. Camp, 130 F.3d 958 , 964 & n. 10 (11th Cir.1997) (explaining the Eleventh Circuit's position that "the Rochin standard has no place in a civil case for money damages," McKinney v. Pate, 20 F.3d 1550 , 1556 n. 7 (11th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 898 , 130 L.Ed.2d 783 (1995)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 2296 , 141 L.Ed.2d 157 (1998) 2 The following citations to contempt statutes refer to the laws in effect at the time of Armstrong's arrest and detention.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ward Franklin Dean
See McKinney v. Pate, 20 F.3d 1550, 1560 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 898 , 130 L.Ed.2d 783 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
DA Mortgage, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach
See McKinney v. Pate, 20 F.3d 1550, 1560 (11th Cir.1994), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 898 , 130 L.Ed.2d 783 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Rigby v. Marshall
See McKinney v. Pate, 20 F.3d 1550 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 898 , 130 L.Ed.2d 783 (1995); Thornquest v. King, 82 F.3d 1001, 1003, n. 2 (11th Cir.1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Padilla v. Miller
See United States v. Kim, 27 F.3d 947, 950 (3d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Vickie Fogie v. Thorn Americas, Inc.
See Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1398 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1999
See Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1398 (11th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 (1995). 4 The plaintiffs claim the Seventh Circuit has determined that allegations that subsidiaries conducted a parent-company enterprise are sufficient.The plaintiffs base their argument on Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co., 747 F.2d 384 (7th Cir. 1984),aff'd on other grounds, 473 U.S. 606 (1985), in which the Seventh Circuit asserted that it is "virtually self-evident that a subsidiary acts on behalf of, and thus conducts the affairs of, its parent corpo…
discussed
Cited "see"
Iron Workers Local Union No. 17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.
See Cox v. Administrator, U.S. Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1399 (11th Cir.), modified per curiam on other grounds, 30 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995); Mid Atlantic, 18 F.3d at 263 . 50 Plaintiffs’ evidence is sufficient to meet this requirement.
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. Nebraska Department of Public Institutions
See McKinney v. Pate, 20 F.3d 1550 (11th Cir. 1994), cert. denied 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S. Ct. 898 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County, Florida
See generally Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1399 (11th Cir.1994) ("A proximate cause is not ... the same thing as a sole cause."), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995) 24 Again, we leave it to the district court to decide the standard for causation for purposes of liability.
discussed
Cited "see"
Loggerhead Turtle v. Cty. Council
See generally Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1399 (11th Cir. 1994) (“A proximate cause is not . . . the same thing as a sole cause.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 (1995). 36 manner that is likely to result in violation of [the ESA]”), petition for cert. filed, 66 U.S.L.W. 3605 (Mar. 6, 1998) (No. 97-1485); Defenders of Wildlife v. Administrator, Envtl.
discussed
Cited "see"
Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County
(2×)
See generally Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1399 (11th Cir.1994) ("A proximate cause is not ... the same thing as a sole cause."), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995). 34 (8th Cir.1989) (federal agency caused takes of the endangered black-footed ferret through its "decision to register pesticides" even though other persons actually distributed or used the pesticides).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pungitore
See, Napoli v. United States, (“Napoli I”), 32 F.3d 31, 37 (2nd Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hayden v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
See Cox v. Administrator U.S. Steel & Carnegie, 17 F.3d 1386, 1410 (11th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 30 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995); Petro-Tech, Inc. v. Western Co. of N. Am., 824 F.2d 1349 , 1356 (3d Cir.1987); Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc. v. Sinibaldi, 1994 WL 796603 , at *4-5 (D.Del.1994); Laterza v. American Broadcasting Co., 581 F.Supp. 408, 412 (S.D.N.Y.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland Apartments
See Kelley v. Environmental Protection Agency, 15 F.3d 1100, 1107-08 (D.C.Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995). 25 We express no opinion regarding the district court's finding that Coit and Roar are not responsible parties within the meaning of § 107(a) 26 The general partners and the district court point to Redwing as being the only "third party" at issue here.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laskar v. Board of Regents of the University System
See, e.g., McKinney v. Pate, 20 F3d 1550, 1557 (11th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U. S. 1110 (115 SC 898, 130 LE2d 783) (1995) (a claim under 42 USC § 1983 arises when the State refuses to provide procedural due process); Edmonds v. Bd. of Regents of Univ.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joy Lasker v. Board of Regents University System of Ga
See, e. g., McKinney v. Pate, 20 F3d 1550 , 1557 (11th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 ( 15 SCt 898 , 130 LE2d 783) (1995) (a claim under 42 USC § 1983 arises when the State refuses to provide 15 procedural due process); Edmonds v. Board of Regents of University System of Georgia, 302 Ga. App. 1, 11-12 (4) (b) ( 689 SE2d 352 ) (2009) (reviewing constitutional due process claim against Board filed by tenured Georgia Tech professor after he was suspended indefinitely).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Lopez
See also United States v. Kim, 27 F.3d 947, 949-950, 954 (3d Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 (1995) (no search or seizure when police questioned defendant at door of sleeping compartment in train).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. Ross & Hardies
See, e.g., Napoli v. United States, 32 F.3d 31 (2d Cir.1994) (where enterprise was law firm, lawyers participated in core activities of trying cases and obtaining settlements), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995); Tribune Co. v. Purcigliotti, 869 F.Supp. 1076, 1098 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (denying motion to dismiss where lawyers allegedly helped devise scheme and directed others to act to further scheme of filing false claims), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arons v. Lalime
More recently, however, the Circuit adopted the Supreme Court’s holding in Reves v. Ernst & Young, 507 U.S. 170 , 113 S.Ct. 1163 , 122 L.Ed.2d 525 (1993), applying a narrower test “to gauge whether a defendant had a sufficient connection to the enterprise to warrant imposing liability under § 1962(c).” United States v. Viola, 35 F.3d 37, 40 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1198 , 115 S.Ct. 1270 , 131 L.Ed.2d 148 (1995); see also Napoli v. United States, 32 F.3d 31, 34-35 (2d Cir.1994),cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Madanes v. Madanes
See, e.g., Napoli v. United States, 32 F.3d 31, 33 (2d Cir. 1994) (scheme involved pattern of mail fraud and witness bribery by pursuing counterfeit claims and using false witnesses in personal injury trials and law firm defendant "earned millions in contingency fees from personal injury suits involving fraud or bribery’’), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995); Tribune Co. v. Purcigliotti, 869 F.Supp. 1076, 1082-83 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (scheme resulted in filing of hundreds of fraudulent workers' compensation hearing loss claims), off'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paralyzed Veterans of America, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. D.C. Arena L.P., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership, Appellants/cross-Appellees
Compare Kelley v. EPA, 15 F.3d 1100 , 1108 (D.C.Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1110 , 115 S.Ct. 900 , 130 L.Ed.2d 784 (1995). 5 Moreover — and we think this is significant— Congress, by specifically requiring the publication of a technical manual that would further refine or interpret in detail the regulation’s substantive obligations, contemplated a continuing administration of the regulation that approaches, if not equates with, the adjudicatory authority of other statutory schemes. *586 C.
Aispuro, Warden
v.
Melendez Longoria
v.
Melendez Longoria
No. 94-648.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1995.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.