green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert a Bussian James J Keating v. Rjr Nabisco Incorporated
See Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308, 1320 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1066 , 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995); District 65, U.A.W. v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 576 F.Supp. 1468, 1477-78 (S.D.N.Y.1983); Daniel Fischel & J.H.
discussed
Cited "see"
Flanigan v. General Electric Co.
See Borst v. Chevron, 36 F.3d 1308, 1315 (5th Cir.1994) (concluding that, based on definition in Treasury regulations, “benefits accrued” in § 411(d)(3) does not encompass a right to a share of the surplus assets if not specified in the plan itself), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1066 , 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Courtney v. American Airlines, Inc.
See Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308, 1324 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1066 , 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc.
(2×)
See Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308 , 1311 n. 2 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1066 , 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Hunt v. Hawthorn Associates, Inc.
See Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308 , 1311 n.2 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc., Eastern Air Lines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots Trust Administrative Committee of the Eastern Airlines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots
See Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308 , 1311 n. 2 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1066 , 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Susan Defelice v. American International Life Assurance Company of New York
See Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308, 1323-24 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995); Cox v. Keystone Carbon Co., 894 F.2d 647, 649-50 (3d Cir.1990); Daniel v. Eaton Corp., 839 F.2d 263, 268 (6th Cir.1988); Howard v. Parisian, Inc., 807 F.2d 1560, 1566-67 (11th Cir.1987), Berry v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 761 F.2d 1003, 1006-07 (4th Cir.1985); Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348, 1357 (9th Cir.1984); In re Vorpahl, 695 F.2d 318 (8th Cir.1982); Wardle v. Central States, S.E. & S.W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hawkeye National Life Insurance v. Avis Industrial Corp.
See, e.g., Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308, 1322 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied 514 U.S. 1066 , 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 *503 (1995); Johnson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 19 F.3d 1184, 1190 (7th Cir. 1994); Chait v. Bernstein, 835 F.2d 1017, 1027 (3d Cir.1987); Financial Institutions Retirement Fund v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 766 F.Supp. 1302, 1308 (S.D.N.Y.1991), aff 'd by 964 F.2d 142 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1469, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936b Hawkeye National Life Insurance Company v. Avis Industrial Corporation Edgerton Forge, Inc., Steel Technologies, Inc. Midwest Plating and Chemical Corporation, Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union, Local 15 Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union, Local 24 Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union, Local 301 Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union, Local 305, Hawkeye National Life Insurance Company v. Avis Industrial Corporation Edgerton Forge, Inc., Steel Technologies, Inc. Midwest Plating and Chemical Corporation, Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union, Local 15 Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union, Local 24 Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union, Local 301 Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers and Allied Workers International Union, Local 305
See, e.g., Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308, 1322 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied 514 U.S. 1066 , 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995); Johnson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 19 F.3d 1184, 1190 (7th Cir.1994); Chait v. Bernstein, 835 F.2d 1017, 1027 (3d Cir.1987); Financial Institutions Retirement Fund v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 766 F.Supp. 1302, 1308 (S.D.N.Y.1991), aff'd by 964 F.2d 142 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cammermeyer v. Perry
See, e.g., Blair v. Shanahan, 38 F.3d 1514, 1521 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1698 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995) (appellant did not intend to moot appeal); Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. Western Conference of Teamsters, 686 F.2d 720, 722 (9th Cir.1982) (appellant did so intend).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
72 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 93, 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,289, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7424, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,199 Margarethe Cammermeyer, Colonel v. William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense Togo D. West, Secretary of the Army United States of America, (Two Cases)
See, e.g., Blair v. Shanahan, 38 F.3d 1514, 1521 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1698 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995) (appellant did not intend to moot appeal); Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. Western Conference of Teamsters, 686 F.2d 720, 722 (9th Cir.1982) (appellant did so intend).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Warrick
The district court correctly granted appellees' [Rule 12(b)(6) ] motion to dismiss on this claim." Malia, 23 F.3d at 833; see also Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308, 1316 (5th Cir.1994) ("Nothing in ERISA ... mandates a distribution of any surplus assets on a partial termination [of a defined benefit pension plan]...."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995) 3 GE's principal place of business is in Fairfield, Connecticut; the text of the GE Plan may be reviewed at this location.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warrick v. General Electric Co.
The district court correctly granted appellees’ [Rule 12(b)(6)] motion to dismiss on this claim.” Malia, 23 F.3d at 833; see also Borst v. Chevron Corp., 36 F.3d 1308, 1316 (5th Cir.1994) ("Nothing in ERISA ... mandates a distribution of any surplus assets on a partial termination [of a defined benefit pension plan].... ”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed.2d 561 (1995). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilson et ux.
v.
Alexander's Power Shipping Co., Ltd.
v.
Alexander's Power Shipping Co., Ltd.
No. 94-1436.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 1995.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.