green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Board of Supervisors of La. State v. Smack Apparel Co.
See Society of Financial Examiners v. National Ass’n of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc., 41 F.3d 223, 225 (5th Cir.) (“The gravamen for any action of trademark infringement or common law unfair competition is whether the challenged mark is likely to cause confusion.”), cert. *659 denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marine Office of America Corp. v. Lilac Marine Corp.
See, National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied by 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995); Milton v. Van Dorn Co., 961 F.2d 965, 969 (1st Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Labrecque v. Sodexho USA, Inc.
Rennie v. United Parcel Service, 139 F.Supp.2d 159, 164 (D.Mass.2001); see Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
First National Bank v. Wiggins (In Re Wiggins)
See Cades v. H & R Block, Inc., 43 F.3d 869, 872 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Dupres v. City of Newport, RI
See National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 736 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Reich v. John Alden Life Insurance
See National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Christiansen v. Beneficial National Bank
See Cades v. H & R Block, Inc., 43 F.3d 869, 873-74 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995): Basile v. H & R Block, Inc., 897 F.Supp. 194, 198-99 (E.D.Pa.1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Rafaela Cortes-Irizarry v. Corporacin Insular De Seguros
See National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Soto v. Carrasquillo
(2×)
See National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 743-44 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995) 9 Law 54 has been noted in academic literature for "its ambitious and comprehensive approach to domestic violence." See Rivera, Puerto Rico's Domestic Violence Prevention and Intervention Law and the United States Violence Against Women Act of 1994: The Limitations of Legislative Responses, 5 Colum.
cited
Cited "see"
Tingley Systems, Inc. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.
See National Amusements [v. Town of Dedham], 43 F.3d [731,] 735 [ (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995) ].
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,398 Joao Carreiro, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Teresa v. Carreiro v. Rhodes Gill and Co., Ltd., Joao Carreiro, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Teresa v. Carreiro v. Rhodes Gill and Co., Ltd., Main MacHinery Company
See National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 749 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995) (arguments not presented below are waived); Frazier v. Bailey, 957 F.2d 920, 932 (1st Cir.1992) (arguments not fully presented in appellate brief are waived). 31 In sum, having concluded that Rhode Island law would not impose successor liability under the de facto merger and mere continuation exceptions absent an asset transfer, and finding no evidence of any asset transfer on the record, we affirm summary judgment for defendant Main.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carreiro v. Rhodes Gill and Co.
See National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 749 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995) (arguments not presented below are waived); Frazier v. Bailey, 957 F.2d 920, 932 (1st Cir.1992) (arguments not fully presented in appellate brief are waived).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP.
Co. of Puerto Rico, Inc., 167 F.3d 1 , 7 (1st Cir.1999); see also Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orwat v. Maloney
Co. of Puerto Rico, Inc., 167 F.3d 1 , 7 (1 Cir., 1999); see also Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
El Marocco Club, Inc. v. Fox
Further, a “regulation that serves purposes unrelated to the content of expression is deemed neutral, even if it has an incidental effect on some speakers or messages but not others.” Id.; see also National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 740 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995)(holding that town bylaw prohibiting licensed businesses from operating between 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. was a constitutional restriction of protected speech because it was aimed at protecting private, residential life from commercial activities); Tollis I…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neles-Jamesbury, Inc. v. Valve Dynamics, Inc.
“The gravamen for any action of trademark infringement or common law unfair competition is whether the challenged mark is likely to cause confusion.” Marathon Manufacturing, 767 F.2d at 217 (5th Cir.1985) (citations omitted); see also Society of Financial Examiners v. National Ass’n of Certified Fraud Examiners, Inc., 41 F.3d 223, 225 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Faraone v. City of East Providence
In order to apply the proper level of scrutiny to the stipulation now before the court, it must first be determined whether the stipulation is “content-based” or “content-neutral.” “The principal inquiry in determining content neutrality, in speech cases generally and in time, place, or manner eases in particular, is whether the government has adopted a regulation of speech because of disagreement with the message it conveys.” Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 , 109 S.Ct. 2746, 2753 , 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); see also National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
11126 Baltimore Boulevard, Incorporated, T/a Warwick Books v. Prince George's County, Maryland
(2×)
See, e.g., Cades v. H & R Block, Inc., 43 F.3d 869, 876 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2247 , 132 L.Ed.2d 255 (1995); Hatley v. Lockhart, 990 F.2d 1070, 1073 (8th Cir.1993) (" '[A] party's failure to raise or discuss an issue in his brief is to be deemed an abandonment of that issue.' ") (quoting Jasperson v. Purolator Courier Corp., 765 F.2d 736, 740 (8th Cir.1985)); Winston v. Children & Youth Servs. of Del.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cheeves
v.
Southern Clays, Inc.
v.
Southern Clays, Inc.
No. 94-1540.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 30, 1995.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.