green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Claude E. Woods v. Larry Smith
But see Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464 (8th Cir.1994) (effectively imposing a favorable termination requirement in this context), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Plaster
See Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 469 (8th Cir.1994) (claims of retaliation fail if alleged retaliatory-conduct violations were issued for actual violation of prison rule), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1145 , 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995); Goff v. Burton, 7 F.3d 734, 738-39 (8th Cir.1993) (defendant may successfully defend retaliatory-discipline claim by showing "some evidence" that inmate actually committed rule violation), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1209 , 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 817 (1994). 8 Accordingly, we affirm.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward Moore v. Sam Plaster
See Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 469 (8th Cir.1994) (claims of retaliation fail if alleged retaliatory-conduct violations were issued for actual violation of prison rule), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1145 , 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995); Goff v. Burton, 7 F.3d 734, 738-39 (8th Cir.1993) (defendant may successfully defend retaliatory-discipline claim by showing “some evidence” that inmate actually committed rule violation), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1209 , 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 817 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter B. Farver v. L. Schwartz
See Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 469 (8th Cir.1994) (finding that disciplinary is based on some evidence of violation “essentially checkmates” retaliation claim), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1145 , 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Gutierrez
See Broxton v. State, 866 S.W.2d 711, 714 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993), aff'd, Ex parte Broxton, 888 S.W.2d 23 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), ce rt. denied, 515 U.S. 1145 , 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995) (emphasis in original); see also McDuff v. State, 939 S.W.2d 607, 621 (Tex.Crim.App.1997); Ex parte Smith, 884 S.W.2d 551, 554 (Tex.App.—Austin 1994, no pet.); Smith v. State, 842 S.W.2d 401, 404 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1992, pet. ref'd).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stone
(2×)
See United States v. Perez-Tosta, 36 F.3d 1552, 1563 (11th Cir.1994) (reiterating that "a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel cannot be considered on direct appeal if those claims were not first raised before the district court and if there has been no opportunity to develop a record of evidence relevant to the merits of the claim"), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1145 , 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charbonneau
See Ledbetter v. Edwards, 35 F.3d 1062, 1067 (6th Cir.1994), cert, denied, 515 U.S. 1145 , 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul Handeen v. Gregory A. Lemaire Henry Lemaire Patricia Lemaire, Orlins & Brainerd Law Firm Richard K. Brainerd Peter I. Orlins
See United States v. Bennett, 44 F.3d 1364, 1374 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, —U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2279 , 132 L.Ed.2d 282 , and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2585 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 , and cert. denied, — U.S -, 116 S.Ct. 98 , 133 L.Ed.2d 52 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burnham v. Ianni
See Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304 , ----, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 2156 , 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995) (citing Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530 , 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2817-18 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985) (interlocutory appellate jurisdiction exists where qualified immunity issue involves application of "clearly established" law to a given set of undisputed facts)). 19 " 'While the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not normally an appealable final judgment, an exception exists for a summary judgment order denying qualified immunity ... [and for] issues of law that are closely related to the qualified im…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee Moorman, Jr. v. John A. Thalacker
See Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 468 (8th Cir.1994) (interpretation of “assault” to include throwing orange juice on a guard not objectively unreasonable), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lee Moorman, Jr. v. John A. Thalacker, Sued as John Thalacker Larry Brimeyer Thomas Luensman, Sued as C/o Luensman Jerome Manternach, Sued as Jerry Manternach, Charles Lee, Harold Wood, Lee Moorman, Jr. v. John A. Thalacker, Sued as John Thalacker Larry Brimeyer Thomas Luensman, Sued as C/o Luensman Jerome Manternach, Sued as Jerry Manternach Charles Lee Harold Wood
See Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 468 (8th Cir.1994) (interpretation of "assault" to include throwing orange juice on a guard not objectively unreasonable), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Cantu
See Ex parte Broxton, 888 S.W.2d 23, 28 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995). 5 We overrule Cantu’s first point of error.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Strayhand
(2×)
See Ledbetter v. Edwards, 35 F.3d 1062, 1067-69 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilda M. Thomas Elizabeth W. Thomas
See United States v. Perez-Tosta, 36 F.3d 1552 , 1556 n.2 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied , — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ricky Earnest v. Nuby G. Courtney Kelvin L. Murphy Shirley McCoy
See Henderson v, Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 469 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995); Goff v. Burton, 7 F.3d 734, 738 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2684 , 129 L.Ed.2d 817 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Reed
See also Kimbro v. Velten, 30 F.3d 1501, 1508 (D.C.Cir.1994) (court determine scope of employment under § 2679(d)(3), and where necessary, conducts a hearing), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1145 , 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995); Melendez-Colon v. United States, 56 F.Supp.2d 142, 144 (D.P.R.1999) (if pleadings, affidavits and any supporting documentary evidence reveals issue of material fact, the court can hold an evidentiary hearing on scope of employment issue under the FTCA).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mark v. State
Compare Henderson v. Baird, 29 F.3d 464, 469 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995) (holding that if the inmate actually violated the prison rule for which he was disciplined, he had no retaliatory-discipline claim) with Woods, 60 F.3d at 1166 (prisoner violating rule might have a claim but “to state a retaliatory discipline claim inmate must allege and be prepared to establish but for the retaliatory motive the complained of incident ... would not have occurred”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Von Dohlen
See also Ledbetter v. Edwards, 35 F.3d 1062 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 2584 , 132 L.Ed.2d 833 (1995) (defendant's will is not overborne merely because he is led to believe government's knowledge of his guilt is greater than it actually is).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alley
v.
General Electric Capital Corp.
v.
General Electric Capital Corp.
No. 94-1852.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 1995.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.